related_tweet: @sarahfasha @tammypaulson20 @cloudscsgo @ajd121 @mattlat83 @funman4tw @ggpa20680378 @americanladyde @alligatorjb @mmoore6025 @poppa0r @sarcastic_deer @marco_monzon_ @barrythcableguy @charlesmartelxx @rittenhousefan1 @99flagg @jdawg528 @catchpolezak @steel24 @sheerobon56 @queenacastle @freekyleusa yes.   948.60(3) a, b and c outlines how under 18 can possess a dangerous weapon.   in kyle's case he does not qualify for possession under a or b but he does for c.   the gun was a legal rifle and he is 17, so under no restriction based on the nested statute in the law.