claim: A Muslim federal judge has implemented "two items" of sharia law in the United States.
origin: On 24 July 2017, fake news site AsAmericanAsApplePie.org published a story reporting that a Muslim federal judge named â€œMahal al Alallaha-Smithâ€ had imposed â€œtwo itemsâ€ of sharia law (which are religious codes governing conduct within Muslim communities) in the United States. The article seems crafted to exploit a conspiracy theory among those who fear practitioners of Islam that sharia law is â€œcreepingâ€ into U.S. court systems, and that it will soon be forced upon American citizens as the new law of the land. However, the article is made up entirely of falsehoods â€” including a digitally manipulated image of an actual Los Angeles Superior Court judge with a fake name superimposed over his actual name and, of course, a fabricated quote attributed to him: < Judge Mahal al Alallaha-Smith of the 22nd District Federal Court of Appeals ruled this morning that two â€œcritical issues for Muslimsâ€ in Sharia Law had to be abided by in the United States court system because of the systematic infusion clause and because the 14th Amendment guarantees them the rights guaranteed by other states. â€¦ The items Judge Alallaha-Smith refers to are: -A man who finds his Godly wife in the arms of another may beat her in a non-life-threatening manner as prescribed by the Koran. The punishment of death for laying with another man in her own bed cannot be enforced on American soil, but the woman can be beaten daily for a period of ten years. -A family in need of expansion shall allow the marriage of first cousins for one generation as prescribed by the Koran. Women in those families can marry as young as 9 but wonâ€™t be allowed to consummate until they hit maturity as prescribed in the Koran. Until this is fast-tracked to the Supreme Court, which can sometimes take years, Muslim women in America will be at risk. > After a quick inspection of the web siteâ€™s own â€œAboutâ€ page, the fictional content should be no surprise. It reveals that AsAmericanAsApplePie.org is not a reliable source of information â€”Â in fact, if one scrolls down far enough it is finally apparent that the page labels itself as satire: < When no one can trust the lying fake news liberal media anymore because they hate us and guns and Harley Davidson and meat and OUR president, As American as Apple Pie is here to be your beacon of something you can kinda rely on sometimes but not really. > The image the site uses to represent JudgeÂ Mahal al Alallaha-Smith is stolen from a CNN report about a real person â€” Los Angeles Superior Court JudgeÂ Halim Dhanidina. Court spokeswoman Mary Hearn pointed out that Dhanidina is not a federal judge, but rather aÂ sitting judge for the Los Angeles Superior Court, which is â€œa trial court for the state of Californiaâ€¦ California trial courts hear state matters, not federal.â€ Further, the nomenclature used byÂ AsAmericanAsApplePie.org for the Court of Appeals is incorrect, as noÂ â€œ22nd District Court of Appealsâ€ exists. The appellate courts are organized into twelve regional circuits and one federal circuit. There is also no â€œsystematic infusion clauseâ€, whatever that means, to any amendment in the U.S. Constitution. (The 14th Amendment mostly deals with issues relating to citizenship, not religious beliefs.) Finally, laws dictating the legality of marriages between cousins are determined at the state level. We could find no evidence to support the idea that a new legal statute has been implemented in which criminally assaulting a woman would be legally permissible because of her husbandâ€™s supposed religious beliefs. The article is made up of a series of fabricated claims by a satire site and is not based on any fact whatsoever â€”Â the image, name and quotes from the alleged â€œMuslim judgeâ€ were all falsely presented, and his alleged occupation on the â€œ22nd District Court of Appealsâ€ is made up. In fact Dhanidina, the real judge featured by CNN in 2016, specifically said his religious beliefs have no bearing on how he performs his role in the justice system. The writer of the fake article, in keeping with the theme of this satire site, uses the name â€œFlagg Eagletonâ€œ. Other fake news items authored by Flagg include an article reporting that North Koreaâ€™s autocratic leader Kim Jong Un was killed in a bomb drop ordered by President Donald Trump and anotherÂ reportingÂ that a crowd cheered outside a hospital as Trumpâ€™s 2016 rival Hillary Clinton â€œtakes her last breath.â€ The lack of facts has not stopped numerous people from credulously sharing the article and their own anti-Muslim sentiments along with it. One Fox NewsÂ viewerÂ took to Judge Jeanine Pirroâ€™s fan page and wrote with alarm: < AMERICANâ€™S MUST OBJECT TO MUSLIMâ€™S BEING ALLOWED INTO THE GOVERMENT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM ! WAKE UP AMERICA !!! HURRY Judge Mahal al Alallaha-Smith of the 22nd District Federal Court of Appeals ruled this morning that two â€œcritical issues for Muslimsâ€ in Sharia Law had to be abided by in the United States court system because of the systematic infusion clause > Commenters on the siteâ€™s own Facebook pageÂ also seemed unaware of its status as a satire and entertainment site, with vitriolic responses calling for the (fake) judgeâ€™s removal from his (fictional) position, and saying, predictably, that Muslim people should not be allowed to serve as judges in the United States