claim: Between the end of the Civil War and his death, former Confederate General Robert E. Lee expressed opposition to the building of Confederate monuments.
origin: A century-and-a-half-old debate over the propriety of erecting statues and monuments to the Confederacy in the post-Civil War era came back with full force in August 2017 when a white nationalistÂ rallyÂ protesting the planned removal of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee in Charlottesville, Virginia, turned violent, culminating in a vehicular attack that killed one person and injured 19. The incident sparked an accelerated effort by states and municipalities in various parts of the country to remove such monuments, of which there are approximately 750 spread across the U.S., according to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Proponents of their removal say the continued presence of the monuments confers undue dignity on a faction that fought to preserve the institution of slavery and the ethos of white supremacy that underlays it. Those who defend the markers, on the other hand â€” among the most prominent of whom is President Donald Trump â€” say they deserve to stand as reminders of Americaâ€™s past: < Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments. Youâ€¦.. â€” Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 17, 2017 > < â€¦canâ€™t change history, but you can learn from it. Robert E Lee, Stonewall Jackson â€“ whoâ€™s next, Washington, Jefferson? So foolish! Alsoâ€¦ â€” Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 17, 2017 > < â€¦the beauty that is being taken out of our cities, towns and parks will be greatly missed and never able to be comparably replaced! â€” Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 17, 2017 > A majority of Americans side with the president, an August 2017Â PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist pollÂ found, with 62 percent of respondentsÂ agreeingÂ that such monuments ought to remain in place as â€œhistorical symbols.â€ One of the most frequently cited voices in opposition to Confederate monuments, ironically, is that of the white, slave-owning Confederate General Robert E. Lee: < So about that Robert E Lee statueâ€¦ hereâ€™s what the man himself said about Civil War monuments: pic.twitter.com/9pZTYiDddX â€” Maddox (@maddoxrules) August 16, 2017 > < Even Robert E. Lee opposed monuments to Robert E. Lee https://t.co/hnnist1GYO pic.twitter.com/Pz4cIsNMcj â€” Alexander Clarkson (@APHClarkson) August 17, 2017 > That Lee expressed such views, and did so more than once between the end of the Civil War and his death in 1870 isÂ confirmedÂ by historian and biographer Jonathan Horn, who wrote in 2016: < In April 1865, after four years of civil war, Lee surrendered the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia and soon afterward accepted the presidency of Washington College in Lexington, Virginia. Letters seeking support for memorial projects received reluctant responses from the general-turned-educator, according to documents at the University of Virginia and the Library of Congress. Lee worried that building memorials so soon after the war would anger the victorious Federals. â€œAs regards the erection of such a monument as is contemplated, my conviction is, that however grateful it would be to the feelings of the South, the attempt in the present condition of the country would have the effect of retarding, instead of accelerating its accomplishment, and of continuing, if not adding to, the difficulties under which the Southern people labour,â€ he wrote. In June 1866, Lee criticized a plan to build a monument to Gen. Thomas â€œStonewallâ€ Jackson, whose fatal wounding at Chancellorsville three years prior had deprived the Army of Northern Virginia of its best corps commander. How could Lee ask war-ravaged families to contribute money for memorials when they lacked funds for food? â€œI do not think it feasible at this time,â€ he wrote. > Itâ€™s not strictly accurate to say that Leeâ€™s objections to memorializing the Civil War applied only to Confederate monuments, however. A letter he wrote to David McConaughy of the Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association in 1869, in which he turned down an invitation to participate in their preservation efforts, made clear his conviction that it was more important for the nation to heal than to perpetuate the memory of the â€œcivil strifeâ€ it had so recently undergone. The letter was quoted in a 21 November 1957Â article in theÂ Chicago Tribune: < â€œMy engagements will not permit me to be present, and I believe if there I could not add anything material to the information existing on the subject,â€ Lee wrote to David McConaughy. â€œI think it well, moreover, not to keep open the sores of war, but to follow the examples of those nations who endeavored to obliterate the marks of civil strife and to commit to oblivion the feelings it engendered.â€ > Horn quotes this passage as well, saying of Lee < Rather than raising battlefield memorials, he favored erasing battlefields from the landscape altogetherâ€¦. Lee feared that these reminders of the past would preserve fierce passions for the future. Such emotions threatened his vision for speedy reconciliation. As he saw it, bridging a divided country justified abridging history in places. > Leeâ€™s zeal for North-South reconciliation verged on the evangelical, judging from some of his postwar statements. Another of his biographers, Charles Bracelen Flood, recounted an anecdote that speaks to Leeâ€™s conviction that the formerly warring factions â€”Â particularly the side that lost, his side, the South â€” needed to forgive and forget and get on with the business of being Americans: < Lee knew that the war was over and that everything depended on a new attitude for a new day. He was taken to call on a lady who lived north of Lexington, and she promptly showed him the remains of a tree in her yard. All its limbs had been shot off by Federal artillery fire during Hunterâ€™s raid, and its trunk torn by cannonballs. The woman looked at him expectantly as she showed him this memento of what she and her property had endured. Here was a man who would sympathize. Lee finally spoke. â€œCut it down, my dear Madam, and forget it.â€ > Little could he have imagined that we would still be debating the issue some 150 years hence.