kapil dev won most man of the match in ipl.
who won most man of the match in ipl?
kapil dev
however, despite this slow start, ipl 5 garnered a higher cumulative viewership than any previous edition of the ipl. the cumulative reach for 74 ipl 5 matches was recorded at 163 million against 162 million for 73 matches in ipl 4, and the final match had a higher reach than any previous final.





















































section::::reception and controversies.:2012 cricinfo ipl xi.





















































bullet::::- chris gayle





















































bullet::::- gautam gambhir (c)





















































bullet::::- suresh raina





















































bullet::::- jacques kallis





















































bullet::::- rohit sharma





















































bullet::::- ms dhoni (wk)





















































bullet::::- ambati rayudu





















































bullet::::- dale steyn





















































bullet::::- parvinder awana





















































bullet::::- umesh yadav





















































bullet::::- sunil narine





















































bullet::::- steve smith (12th man)
2012 indian premier league
a growing body of evidence indicates that humans, in addition to having a long-term store for word meanings located in the mtg-tp of the avs (i.e., the semantic lexicon), also have a long-term store for the names of objects located in the spt-ipl region of the ads (i.e., the phonological lexicon). for example, a study examining patients with damage to the avs (mtg damage) or damage to the ads (ipl damage) reported that mtg damage results in individuals incorrectly identifying objects (e.g., calling a "goat" a "sheep," an example of semantic paraphasia). conversely, ipl damage results in individuals correctly identifying the object but incorrectly pronouncing its name (e.g., saying "gof" instead of "goat," an example of phonemic paraphasia). semantic paraphasia errors have also been reported in patients receiving intra-cortical electrical stimulation of the avs (mtg), and phonemic paraphasia errors have been reported in patients whose ads (pstg, spt, and ipl) received intra-cortical electrical stimulation. further supporting the role of the ads in object naming is an meg study that localized activity in the ipl during the learning and during the recall of object names. a study that induced magnetic interference in participants' ipl while they answered questions about an object reported that the participants were capable of answering questions regarding the object's characteristics or perceptual attributes but were impaired when asked whether the word contained two or three syllables. an meg study has also correlated recovery from anomia (a disorder characterized by an impaired ability to name objects) with changes in ipl activation. further supporting the role of the ipl in encoding the sounds of words are studies reporting that, compared to monolinguals, bilinguals have greater cortical density in the ipl but not the mtg. because evidence shows that, in bilinguals, different phonological representations of the same word share the same semantic representation, this increase in density in the ipl verifies the existence of the phonological lexicon: the semantic lexicon of bilinguals is expected to be similar in size to the semantic lexicon of monolinguals, whereas their phonological lexicon should be twice the size. consistent with this finding, cortical density in the ipl of monolinguals also correlates with vocabulary size. notably, the functional dissociation of the avs and ads in object-naming tasks is supported by cumulative evidence from reading research showing that semantic errors are correlated with mtg impairment and phonemic errors with ipl impairment. based on these associations, the semantic analysis of text has been linked to the inferior-temporal gyrus and mtg, and the phonological analysis of text has been linked to the pstg-spt- ipl
language processing in the brain