you have to be 18 to get a tattoo with parental consent in tennessee.
how old do you have to be to get a tattoo with parental consent in tennessee?
18
this bill proposes to amend the gender recognition act 2015. at present, a person aged 16 to 18 years must receive a court order, parental consent and the intervention of medical professionals before they can be issued a gender recognition certificate after a gender reassignment surgery. under this bill, a person aged 16 to 18 will be treated the same as a person 18 years or older. it also proposes to amend the procedure for persons under the age of 16 who will normally have to get parental permission to undergo gender reassignment surgery. a court can dispense with parental consent if the court decides that the refusal of parental consent would not be in the best interests of the child. this bill will also empower the minister for justice to review the gender recognition act in order to grant gender recognition certificates to persons who do not identify as exclusively male or female after a gender reassignment surgery.
list of laws and reports on lgbt rights in the republic of ireland
in the united states, most states typically require one of two types of parental involvement– consent or notification, or both. 37 states require parental involvement in a minor's decision to have an abortion (21 states require parental consent only, 3 of which require both parents to consent; 11 states require parental notification only, 1 of which requires that both parents be notified; 5 states require both parental consent and notification; 8 states require the parental consent documentation to be notarized). in delaware the law only applies to minors under 16, and in south carolina to minors under 17. parental involvement laws played a key role in forcing the court to clarify its position on abortion regulation. the court ruled, in essence, that parental involvement laws (and all other abortion regulation) can legally make it more difficult for a female to acquire an abortion. but there is a threshold beyond which the increased difficulties become unconstitutional. requiring spousal involvement before a woman can acquire an abortion has been interpreted as falling on the unconstitutional side of that threshold, while parental involvement has been interpreted as falling on the constitutional side. or, to use the language of "planned parenthood of southeastern pennsylvania v. casey" (1992), spousal notification laws place an "undue burden" on a woman's ability to get an abortion, whereas parental involvement laws do not.
minors and abortion