the meaning of ci in police is inspector of police.
what is the meaning of ci in police?
inspector of police
na
na
asenapine seems to have a relatively low weight gain liability for an atypical antipsychotic (which are notorious for their metabolic side effects) and according to a recent meta-analysis it produces "significantly" less weight gain (smd [standard mean difference in weight gained in those on placebo vs. active drug]: 0.23; 95% ci: 0.07-0.39) than, paliperidone (smd: 0.38; 95% ci: 0.27-0.48), risperidone (smd: 0.42; 95% ci: 0.33-0.50), quetiapine (smd: 0.43; 95% ci: 0.34-0.53), sertindole (smd: 0.53; 95% ci: 0.38-0.68), chlorpromazine (smd: 0.55; 95% ci: 0.34-0.76), iloperidone (smd: 0.62; 95% ci: 0.49-0.74), clozapine (smd: 0.65; 95% ci: 0.31-0.99), zotepine (smd: 0.71; 95% ci: 0.47-0.96) and olanzapine (smd: 0.74; 95% ci: 0.67-0.81) and "approximately" (that is, no statistically significant difference at the p=0.05 level) as much as weight gain as aripiprazole (smd: 0.17; 95% ci: 0.05-0.28), lurasidone (smd: 0.10; 95% ci: –0.02-0.21), amisulpride (smd: 0.20; 95% ci: 0.05-0.35), haloperidol (smd: 0.09; 95% ci: 0.00-0.17) and ziprasidone (smd: 0.10; 95% ci: –0.02-0.22). its potential for elevating plasma prolactin levels seems relatively limited too according to this meta-analysis. this meta-analysis also found that asenapine has approximately the same odds ratio (3.28; 95% ci: 1.37-6.69) for causing sedation [compared to placebo-treated patients] as olanzapine (3.34; 95% ci: 2.46-4.50]) and haloperidol (2.76; 95% ci: 2.04-3.66) and a higher odds ratio (although not "significantly") for sedation than aripiprazole (1.84; 95% ci: 1.05-3.05), paliperidone (1.40; 95% ci: 0.85-2.19) and amisulpride (1.42; 95% ci: 0.72 to 2.51) to name a few and is hence a mild-moderately sedating antipsychotic. being a second-generation ("atypical") antipsychotic its liability for causing extrapyramidal side effect is comparatively low compared to first-generation antipsychotics such as haloperidol as is supported by the aforementioned meta-analysis (although this meta-analysis did reveal it had a relatively high eps liability for an atypical antipsychotic drug).
asenapine