claim: "if you got rid of the income tax today you'd have about as much revenue as we had 10 years ago."
author: ron paul
evidence_1: dec 23, 2007 ... paul: we have to cut spending. you can't get rid of the income tax if you don't get rid of some spending. but, you know, if you got rid of the income tax today you'd have about as much revenue as, as we had 10 years ago, and the size of government wasn't all that bad 10 years ago. so there're sources of ...
evidence_2: he asserts that congress had no power to impose a direct income tax and has introduced legislation to repeal of the 16th amendment to the constitution, which ...... if you got rid of the income tax today you'd have about as much revenue as we had 10 years ago, and the size of government wasn't all that bad 10 years ago.
evidence_3: a: we have to cut spending. you can't get rid of the income tax if you don't get rid of some spending. but, you know, if you got rid of the income tax today you'd have about as much revenue as we had 10 years ago, and the size of government wasn't all that bad 10 years ago. there're sources of revenues other than the ...
evidence_4: mar 20, 2017 ... we've had previous tenants and evictions. i'm ready to sell the properties and cut our losses, but my husband doesn't want to sell at a loss even though the property value for one place is half of what we paid 10 years ago. at some point, you and your husband have to decide what is best for you going ...
evidence_5: may 21, 2017 ... and, if you do that, if you tax everything and give no write offs, then you can set the rates very, very low. so, new zealand has the lowest rates on labor income of any developed country and yet they bring in more revenue per capita than we do. so, that's really where i saw this principle and then it turns out ...