claim: due to the sequester, "people are going to be unsafe. homes are going to burn."
author: ami bera
evidence_1: he wants to round people up and deport folks." — politifact california on  wednesday, october 5th, 2016. mostly false. sequester probably won't be  burning down the house. ami bera · due to the sequester, "people are going to  be unsafe. homes are going to burn." — politifact national on friday, march 1st,  2013.
evidence_2: jun 4, 2010 ... those most vulnerable to smoke-related health problems are people with asthma , young children, pregnant women, and the elderly. according to ... it goes without  saying that anyone involved with green building should cut their own wood or  buy their firewood from loggers concerned with sustainability.
evidence_3: carbon sequestration describes long-term storage of carbon dioxide or other  forms of carbon to either mitigate or defer global warming and avoid dangerous  climate change. it has been proposed as a way to slow the atmospheric and  marine accumulation of greenhouse gases, which are released by burning fossil  fuels.
evidence_4: mar 25, 2014 ... more coal goes to heating millions of homes, to smelting steel (china produces  nearly half the world's steel), and to baking limestone to make cement (china  provides almost half the world's cement). in its frantic quest to develop, china  burns almost as much coal as the rest of the world put together—a fact ...
evidence_5: apr 13, 2012 ... “a mom went back into her house to try to save her kid and they both died.” o' connor says he's seen people lose their lives by going back into burning houses  to try to rescue their pets or retrieve valuables. “the catchphrase in fires is 'risk a  lot to save a lot,' ” he says. in booker's case, o'connor says the ...