claim: "the massachusetts supreme court...defined marriage as simply, quote, the establishment of intimacy ... i guess that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, i guess you could marry your horse."
author: j.d. hayworth
evidence_1: pants on fire! mr. and mrs. ed? j.d. hayworth · "the massachusetts supreme  court...defined marriage as simply, quote, the establishment of intimacy ... i guess  that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, i guess you could  marry your horse." — politifact national on thursday, march 18th, 2010. see  them all ...
evidence_2: i mean, i don't mean to be absurd about it, but i guess i can make the point of  absurdity with an absurd point — i guess that would mean if you really had  affection for your horse, i guess you could marry your horse. it's just the wrong  way to go, and the only way to protect the institution of marriage is with that  federal marriage ...
evidence_3: it can also be a virtue representing human kindness, compassion, and affection— "the unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another". it may also  ..... thus you will ever burn with fraternal love, both for him who is already your  brother and for your enemy, that he may by loving become your brother.  augustine ...
evidence_4: may 23, 2010 ... ... defined marriage as simply, 'the establishment of intimacy,'” followed by “i  mean, i don't mean to be absurd about it, but i guess i can make the point of  absurdity with an absurd point, i guess that would mean if you really had affection  for your horse, i guess you could marry your horse.” you can read about ...
evidence_5: on two occasions i have been asked [by members of parliament!], 'pray, mr.  babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come  out?' i am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could  provoke such a question. ~ charles babbage: 31. history would be an excellent  thing if ...