claim: "there's never been a direct supreme court case on people who were here illegally, whether or not their kids are citizens."
author: rand paul
evidence_1: there's never been a direct supreme court case on people who were here  illegally, whether or not their kids are citizens. so it hasn't really been completely  ...
evidence_2: aug 31, 2010 ... the u.s. supreme court has held that the u.s.-born children of permanent  resident aliens are covered by the citizenship clause, but the court has never  decided whether ... will not significantly reduce costs because their citizen  children can ..... in the united states would have been residing here illegally.
evidence_3: naturalization (or naturalisation) is the legal act or process by which a non-citizen  in a country ... in some rare cases, laws for mass naturalization were passed. ...  them of their nationality, while they had not been naturalized, thus living in a  judicial ... the people's republic of china gives citizenship to persons with one  or two ...
evidence_4: aug 31, 2016 ... trump painted a grim picture of immigrants in the u.s. illegally. ... illegally in the  u.s. to remain in the country and become citizens if .... then there's the case of  90-year-old earl olander, who was brutally beaten and left to bleed to death. ...  thing and only one thing: the needs of people living here illegally.
evidence_5: nov 13, 2015 ... donald trump says the issue has been “fully vetted now” and he was ... to  parents who were citizens of china but legally living in the united states. (there  was no such thing as illegal immigration at the time.) ... the supreme court has  never ruled on the issue of whether children .... people: donald trump.