claim: "nato hasn't provided enough troops (in afghanistan) because they are still angry about us going into iraq."
author: barack obama
evidence_1: mar 4, 2013 ... because of the terrorist threat, they were often locked in embassies and ... some  elements of the mujahideen coalesced into al qaeda, and in 1996 the ... with  u.s. forces withdrawing from afghanistan, pakistan could get its wish. .... with a  number of nato countries and india has provided afghanistan with ...
evidence_2: may 11, 2017 ... the us has lost 1,835 troops since the war began in october 2001, ... it still hasn't , and americans have been in afghanistan trying to give the ... they didn't get  enough troops or weaponry to truly defeat the taliban. ... if one of the main goals  america had going into afghanistan was to ... because of course.
evidence_3: feb 3, 2014 ... from tora bora to wartime fatigue, the u.s. legacy in afghanistan was just ... of  the nato treaty and offered to help the united states go after the ... troops at the  battle of tora bora allowed bin laden to escape into ... the detour into iraq ...  because the taliban still had sanctuaries in neighboring pakistan ...
evidence_4: apr 7, 2017 ... he ought to get, they argue, a new authorization for use of military ... and if the  trump administration does try to go it alone, it's unclear ... approval to go into  kuwait, because the us was acting in support of a united nations resolution. ...  members of congress were upset by the move, it wasn't enough to ...
evidence_5: oct 7, 2008 ... the resurgent taliban is drawing more u.s. forces into the battle. ... part because  afghanistan covers an area 50 percent larger than iraq but ... "there is always the  question, are they [taliban] strong enough, are ... more troops are expected to  reinforce 71,000 american and nato comrades already there.