claim: "before president obama acted in libya in 2011, the american people were opposed to military action by 35 to 60. after he took action, they were in support of it 54 to 43."
author: karl rove
evidence_1: the domestic reactions in the united states after the 2011 military intervention in  libya ranged from criticism to support. unlike the revolutions in tunisia and  egypt, which were carried out largely without external intervention, the brutal  reaction of the gaddafi regime to the protests that began in january and february  2011 ...
evidence_2: apr 6, 2017 ... trump ordered the strike against syria early friday local time in retaliation for the  chemical weapons attack that killed 86 people on tuesday, he said. later, homs  governor ... president trump made a statement regarding the u.s. cruise missile  strike on syria after chemical weapons attack. usa today.
evidence_3: the authorization for the use of military force against the government of syria to  respond to use of chemical weapons (s.j.res 21) is a united states senate  joint resolution that would have authorized president barack obama to use the  american military to intervene in the ongoing syrian civil war. the bill was filed  by ...
evidence_4: united states - the barack obama administration: the crisis worked against  mccain, whom many voters associated with the unpopular policies of the  administration, and ... all those amendments were defeated in votes along party  lines, and on march 25 the bill was passed by a 56–43 vote; however, because of  procedural ...
evidence_5: on 19 march 2011, a multi-state nato-led coalition began a military intervention  in libya, ostensibly to implement united nations security council resolution  1973. the united nations intent and voting was to have "an immediate ceasefire  in libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians, which it said  might ...