claim: the georgia senate ethics resolution "doesn't define cap."
author: david ralston
evidence_1: johnny isakson, georgia, chairman. barbara ..... (2) a contribution, as  defined in the federal election campaign act of. 1971 (2 u.s.c. 431 et .... (23) an  item of little intrinsic value such as a greeting card, baseball cap, or a t-shirt. ......  resolution, the committee on rules and administration shall require such officer  or ...
evidence_2: politifact georgia on wednesday, august 12th, 2015. false. a day is not a ... the  georgia senate ethics resolution "doesn't define cap." — politifact georgia on ...
evidence_3: the definition of a lobbyist typically revolves around lobbying on behalf of  another for compensation. arkansas, connecticut, georgia, hawaii, indiana,  maryland, minnesota, .... exempted by regulations adopted by the office of state  ethics. ... (f) a senator or representative in congress acting within the scope of  his or her ...
evidence_4: 19 hours ago ... but senate leaders might as well be an anti-gang task force. ... is deciding  whether to run for senate to how she sees georgia as the pathway for democrats  in 2020. listen .... o'rourke doesn't yet know the answer, but he's ready to  discuss it.
evidence_5: state senate. state house ... georgia, hawaii, maine, nevada, and west virginia  require parties to follow the same contribution limits established for individuals.