claim: an april 7, 2015 referendum would take "the choice of chief justice" of the wisconsin supreme court "away from the people."
author: greater wisconsin committee
evidence_1: the measure provided for the election of the wisconsin supreme court chief  justice by a ... in april 2015, abrahamson filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block  the ... question 1, approved on april 7, changed chief justice selection from a .....  a lot of the public dysfunction we've seen on the supreme court would go away  as ...
evidence_2: greater wisconsin committee · an april 7, 2015 referendum would take "the  choice of chief justice" of the wisconsin supreme court "away from the people.".
evidence_3: although the election was officially nonpartisan, groups associated with the ... a  screnock victory would have meant that the earliest that control of the court could  .... dallet has received endorsements from wisconsin supreme court justices .....  the wisconsin alliance for reform was established in october 2015 with the ...
evidence_4: nonpartisan state offices elected in 2019 are supreme court justice, court of  appeals judge, .... at the april 3 spring election, voters will be asked to vote on  the question: ... governor as a member of the board of commissioners of public  lands? .... april 7, 2015 include justice of the supreme court, court of appeals  judge ...
evidence_5: an april 7, 2015 referendum would take "the choice of chief justice" of the  wisconsin supreme court "away from the people." — politifact wisconsin on  friday, ...