claim: u.s. sen. johnny isakson "has never proposed, nor voted in favor of, a substantial cut in federal spending" and has voted for "many substantial increases in federal spending."
author: chuck donovan
evidence_1: u.s. sen. johnny isakson "has never proposed, nor voted in favor of, a  substantial cut in federal spending" and has voted for "many substantial  increases in ...
evidence_2: u.s. sen. johnny isakson "has never proposed, nor voted in favor of, a  substantial cut in federal spending" and has voted for "many substantial  increases in ...
evidence_3: according to the ad, “senator joe manchin voted for a bill that would have given  .... a national emergency declaration "may be more symbolic than substantial, but  it would give ... fact check: does research show that federal student aid  increases tuition? ... he did not propose to cut current spending levels or to  reduce social ...
evidence_4: oct 3, 2010 ... we owe this to the state road and tollway authority, which voted to extend the  toll on ga. ... and a libertarian candidate for u.s. senate got things half right. ....  johnny isakson, r-ga., "has never proposed, nor voted in favor of, a substantial  cut in federal spending" and has voted for "many substantial ...
evidence_5: with this funding bill, we've increased the va's budget to the largest ever. .... local  officials, and federal emergency management personnel have the resources  they need ... shrunk our capabilities, and placed substantial burdens on our  warfighters. ... sen. lindsey graham (r-s.c.) did not vote. the bill proposed  reforming ...