claim: democrats do not have a plan for extending the bush tax cuts.
author: sarah palin
evidence_1: congressional democrats offered two attempts to extend the bush-era rates for " middle income" families but restore the previous, higher ... has three  accomplishments: “working families will not lose their tax cut, focused on high  impact job creation measures, and does not ...
evidence_2: dec 17, 2010 ... obama described the bill as "a package of tax relief that will protect the middle  class, that will grow our economy and will create jobs for the american ... in the  wake of the november elections, angered many democrats, who have long  argued that the bush tax cuts were skewed to benefit the wealthy.
evidence_3: dec 6, 2010 ... president obama agreed to a tentative deal to extend the bush tax cuts, part of a  package to keep jobless aid and cut payroll taxes. ... “the house democrats  have not signed off on any deal,” representative chris van hollen of maryland,  who has been representing house democrats in formal negotiations ...
evidence_4: nov 23, 2010 ... and some democrats think it might be a good idea to extend the bush tax cuts for  everyone, at least until the economy has recovered. rep. mike pence, r-ind.,  said this one, and we rated his statement false. • "ninety-four percent of small  businesses will face higher taxes under the democrats' plan.
evidence_5: dec 4, 2010 ... negotiators are discussing a deal to extend all of the bush-era tax cuts, perhaps  for two years, after an obama plan to let rates rise for top incomes failed ... to  $250,000 a year for couples and $200,000 for individuals, but democrats did not  have the 60 votes required under senate rules to muscle it forward.