claim: "the democrats have already voted to ban our conventional light bulbs ... in favor of dangerous fluorescent light bulbs."
author: ameripac
evidence_1: jun 7, 2011 ... the democrats have voted to ban our conventional light bulbs — in favor of  dangerous fluorescent bulbs. now, you can argue that the new light bulbs are  better for any number of reasons, but the bottom line is people will no longer be  able to have what they are used to having. people will have to adjust ...
evidence_2: may 24, 2011 ... "the democrats have already voted to ban our conventional lights bulbs (that  you and i use even today!) in favor of dangerous fluorescent light bulbs." the  letter comes from ameripac, a political action committee that largely supports  conservative republican candidates, and the center for the defense ...
evidence_3: dec 14, 2013 ... regardless, any incandescent light bulbs you have in your house, either already  in fixtures or stored under the sink or in the basement, will remain perfectly legal  ... however, fluorescent light is much cooler than incandescent or halogen light,  making it appear more blue than white to eyes used to the warm, ...
evidence_4: jun 6, 2012 ... we started with the central claim that, "democrats have already voted to ban our  conventional lights bulbs (that you and i use even today!) in favor of dangerous  fluorescent light bulbs." first off, it's not accurate to pin the law entirely to  democrats. it's true that more democrats than republicans voted for the ...
evidence_5: aug 4, 2011 ... “this is their agenda—i know it's hard to believe, it's hard to fathom, but this is ' mission accomplished' for them,” she said of congressional democrats. ... and  that's part of sustainability, is for all time we already have the lightbulbs that we  need, and apparently we'll change filaments as they go out.'” it wasn't ...