claim: "under the baucus bill ... federal funds would subsidize coverage of elective abortions."
author: national right to life committee
evidence_1: mar 17, 2011 ... charlie crist in 2010 that would prohibit the use of federal or state funding to  provide abortion coverage. ... speaking to a house subcommittee on march 16,  2011, gaetz explained that part of the rationale behind hb 97 was to keep the  government out of the business of funding elective abortions. "i ...
evidence_2: the language stated that federal funds provided in the act could not be used for  abortion services except in cases of rape, incest and danger to the woman's life.  plans that received any subsidies under the bill could not cover abortion services . to get that coverage, enrollees would have to purchase a separate, ...
evidence_3: jan 18, 2014 ... reform bills. in part iii, the article will detail the abortion-fund- ing provisions of the  health care reform bills. this section will document attempts to add ... one  concern was that both bills, in opposition to longstanding federal law and policy,  authorized the use of federal funds for elective abortion.'3. 10.
evidence_4: federal agency directly funds abortions under new pelosi bill (h.r. 3962) --  october 29, 2009 ... for insurance plans that cover elective abortion under h.r.  3200 (rebutting the "private funds" myth) -- september 7, 2009 nrlc  memorandum: why the "hyde amendment" will not prevent government funding  of abortion under ...
evidence_5: nrlc: baucus bill has abortion subsidies, dangerous medicare provisions -  september 16, 2009. nrlc responds to sebelius ... nrlc memo: regarding the  use of federal funds to pay directly for elective abortions and to pay for insurance  plans that cover under h.r. 3200 - september 7, 2009. download memo in pdf.