claim: "not only is there no scientific evidence that co2 is a pollutant, higher co2 concentrations actually help ecosystems support more plant and animal life."
author: plantsneedco2.org
evidence_1: oct 5, 2017 ... these organizations argue that since carbon dioxide is a vital chemical for plant  life, more of it can only be a good thing, and that any reduction in co2 ... and a  soothing voiceover affirming that "higher co2 levels than we have today would  help the earth's ecosystems and support more plant and animal life.
evidence_2: apr 18, 2011 ... an argument, made by those who deny man made global warming, is that the  carbon dioxide that is being released by the burning of fossil fuels is actually  good for the environment. their argument is based on the logic that, if plants  need co2 for their growth, then more of it should be better. we should ...
evidence_3: an argument made by those who prefer to see a bright side to climate change is  that carbon dioxide (co2) being released by the burning of fossil fuels is actually  good for the environment. this conjecture is based on simple and appealing  logic: if plants need co2 for their growth, then more of it should be better. we  should ...
evidence_4: here are the 100 reasons, released in a dossier issued by the european  foundation, why climate change is natural and not man-made: 1) there is “no  real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse  gases from man's activity. 2) man-made carbon dioxide emissions ...
evidence_5: how do we know that humans are the major cause of global warming? why does  co2 get most of the attention when there are so many other heat-trapping gases ? does air pollution—specifically particulate matter (aerosols)—affect global  warming? how does the sun affect our climate? is there a connection between  the ...