claim: says claire mccaskill "has had chuck schumer spend more dark money for her than for any senator in america. $16 million and counting!"
author: josh hawley
evidence_1: sep 25, 2018 ... rich liberal @clairecmc is voting no on judge kavanaugh, without ... but she  has had chuck schumer spend more dark money for her than for ... $16 million  and counting! ... this is a partial list of donors for the senate leadership fund  pac .... project veritas caught claire mccaskill staff saying money is ...
evidence_2: josh hawley · says claire mccaskill "has had chuck schumer spend more dark  money for her than for any senator in america. $16 million and counting!".
evidence_3: sep 19, 2018 ... mccaskill cited kavanaugh's views on “dark, anonymous money” as a ... claire  mccaskill will vote against brett kavanaugh's nomination to the ... outside groups  have spent more than $16 million against mccaskill ... “she has sided with chuck  schumer every single time — for liberals and against missouri.
evidence_4: josh hawley · says claire mccaskill "has had chuck schumer spend more dark  money for her than for any senator in america. $16 million and counting!".
evidence_5: oct 29, 2018 ... mccaskill said that this kind of thinking on the court would further ... her and the  democratic leaders in congress, charles schumer and ... republicans have had  mccaskill's seat in their sights for years, and ..... with the aim of increasing his  popularity on the right, she put $1.7 million (more than he spent on ...