claim: "congress can tell [the supreme court] which cases they ought to hear. we have that authority."
author: arlen specter
evidence_1: in the united states, jurisdiction-stripping refers to congress' constitutionally- granted authority to determine the jurisdiction of federal and state courts. ...  likewise, congress has never required that state court cases involving federal ...  we can only examine into its power under the constitution; and the power to  make ...
evidence_2: how the supreme court functions, its membership, politics of the court, etc. ...  how does the court decide which cases to review, and how does it decide the  cases ... shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts as the  congress ... few other courts in the world have the same authority of  constitutional ...
evidence_3: article three of the united states constitution establishes the judicial branch of  the federal government. the judicial branch comprises the supreme court of the  united states and ... article iii authorizes one supreme court, but does not set the  number of .... here, madison would be required to deliver the commissions.
evidence_4: dec 16, 2006 ... at oral argument, most of the supreme court justices agreed that seeing the ...  why does congress get to take cases away from judges or change the rules for  hearing them? ... they'll get some other review provided by the mca. ... letting  congress strip the courts of the authority to hear certain claims or ...
evidence_5: oct 12, 2015 ... guests talk about the 1857 supreme court case [dred scott v. ... the decision  they would make would affect the free states .... we have  decades of a precedent here and i at least for ..... he is deeply  invested in this question about congress's authority, ...