claim: "pls refer to jan.1 tax changes appropriately: they're obama tax hikes & they'll slam every american's savings, investments & job opportunity"
author: sarah palin
evidence_1: "pls refer to jan.1 tax changes appropriately: they're obama tax hikes & they'll  slam every american's savings, investments & job opportunity" · — politifact  national on thursday, december 2nd, 2010. false. see page 39 in 2011 budget.  sarah palin · democrats do not have a plan for extending the bush tax cuts.
evidence_2: nov 30, 2017 ... conservatives slam tax hike trigger ... national taxpayers union: “this is a  seriously misguided approach that will ultimately undermine pro-growth tax  reform legislation.” ... “if they're truly worried about the deficit and they want to  establish a trigger, then they should limit the size of government.
evidence_3: 13 hours ago ... yet notwithstanding all the articles and commentaries about supposed cruelty to  grad students, the house republican plan is based on conventional tax analysis.  simply stated, tuition forgiveness in exchange for work is indeed a form of income  even if no money technically changes hands. so the ...
evidence_4: jun 29, 2012 ... arranged by their respective sizes according to cbo scores, below is the total list  of all $500 billion-plus in tax hikes (over the next ten years) in obamacare, their  effective dates, and where to find them in the bill. $123 billion: surtax on  investment income (takes effect jan. 2013): a new, 3.8 percent surtax ...
evidence_5: apr 26, 2017 ... they concluded that trump's plan would cut taxes by $6 trillion over 10 years,  with almost 50 percent of the savings going to the top 1 percent. to unpack the  plan, i'm going ... the upshot: pro-business conservatives will argue that  reforming the tax code will spur job growth and investments. liberals would ...