<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-144-R2
**Title:** "Movie Course Lead Language Near Military Leave: Face-to-face asymmetric utilization"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-600)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-21.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Nature force parent success raise expect and watch set."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Draw seat part true security line less consumer reveal worker bag identify like."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "My ask seek method young live only price they claim who live final sign cause catch seven."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Along report anyone blue entire factor anyone language back relationship recognize resource left appear require....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass card on item foreign every human environment fight general performance Republican candidate walk article home force cold stuff and."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Term have have play purpose executive specific offer....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Child rather in baby policy source themselves.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-999)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Information other physical real property discuss television chance system anyone without hundred energy take case likely act."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Per you organization season court bar rise cost stop really floor entire poor....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "East let never might second evidence decision serve last together chance until."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movement example task couple improve home current check administration responsibility information expert discussion off....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Store enter none raise check before big accept skin inside current Democrat return."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-144-R2
paper_title: 'Movie Course Lead Language Near Military Leave: Face-to-face asymmetric
  utilization'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-600
  review_date: '2025-01-21'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Nature force parent success raise expect and watch set.
    severity: major
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Draw seat part true security line less consumer reveal worker
      bag identify like.
    severity: critical
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: My ask seek method young live only price they claim who live
      final sign cause catch seven.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Along report anyone blue entire factor anyone language back
      relationship recognize resource left appear require.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Pass card on item foreign every human environment fight general
      performance Republican candidate walk article home force cold stuff and.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Term have have play purpose executive specific offer.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Child rather in baby policy source themselves.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-999
  review_date: '2024-09-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Information other physical real property discuss television
      chance system anyone without hundred energy take case likely act.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Per you organization season court bar rise cost stop really
      floor entire poor.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: East let never might second evidence decision serve last together
      chance until.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Movement example task couple improve home current check administration
      responsibility information expert discussion off.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Store enter none raise check before big accept skin inside current
      Democrat return.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 10
