<format type="json">{report_id: string, property_address: string, report_date: date, report_author_firm: string, overall_risk_assessment: string, estimated_remediation_cost_usd: number optional, structural_assessment: {foundation: {condition: string, issues_identified: list[string], notes: string optional}, framing: {condition: string, issues_identified: list[string], notes: string optional}, roofing: {material: string, age_years: number, condition: string, recommended_action: string optional}}, environmental_findings: {phase_i_esa_status: string, recognized_environmental_conditions: list[{type: string, description: string, severity: string, recommended_action: string optional}], asbestos_containing_materials_present: boolean, lead_based_paint_present: boolean}, building_systems: list[{system_type: string, components_summary: list[{component_name: string, condition: string, estimated_lifespan_remaining_years: number optional, issues: list[string] optional}], overall_system_condition: string, system_recommendations: string optional}], title_encumbrances: list[{type: string, description: string, impact_assessment: string}], capital_expenditure_projections: list[{item: string, category: string, estimated_cost_usd: number, timeline_years: number}], key_due_diligence_recommendations: list[string], summary_narrative: string optional}</format> <data>EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DUE DILIGENCE REPORT
Report ID: DDR-2025-6478
Date of Report: 2025-07-03
Subject Property: 884 Edward Fork Apt. 168, Deannaland, Utah 58467
Prepared by: Peterson-Anderson

This report, commissioned by our client, synthesizes the findings from a comprehensive due diligence investigation of the subject property. The inspection, conducted on a brisk weekday, revealed a significant risk profile, driven by several key factors across structural, environmental, and financial domains. The on-site property manager was cooperative during our walkthrough. 

Structural Assessment:
The building's core structure presents a mixed condition. The foundation was observed to be in good state, with field notes indicating .Similarly, the framing is considered Good; however, no significant issues were readily apparent. Of greater concern is the Built-Up Roof (BUR) roofing system. Having been in service for approximately 18 years, its condition is poor, and it will require monitoring. 

Environmental Findings:
The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) concluded with a status of 'RECs Identified'. Multiple Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were documented. A notable REC of High severity relates to Historical Contamination: Room no return better information learn night us woman usually soldier. A survey for hazardous materials confirmed that the presence of asbestos-containing materials is likely, while lead-based paint is not expected. 

Building Systems and Capital Needs:
An evaluation of major building systems revealed significant deferred maintenance. The HVAC system is in Poor condition. The Plumbing system is in Fair condition. These deficiencies translate into considerable near-term capital needs. Our projections identify a total of $326,380 in required expenditures over the next decade. This includes approximately $184,563 for Roof Replacement within 0 year(s). Immediate and environmental remediation costs are preliminarily budgeted at $326,380. 

Title & Encumbrances:
A preliminary title report review found 2 encumbrances. These include items of significant impact, such as a Lien related to 'Maxwell Inc holds a lien for implement frictionless functionalities.'. 

Key Recommendations:
Based on these findings, we strongly advise the following actions prior to closing: Budget for full roof replacement within 12-24 months.; Require seller to resolve existing mechanics lien prior to closing.; Proceed with Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to quantify contamination..</data>
{
  "report_id": "DDR-2025-6478",
  "property_address": "884 Edward Fork Apt. 168, Deannaland, Utah 58467",
  "report_date": "2025-07-03",
  "report_author_firm": "Peterson-Anderson",
  "overall_risk_assessment": "Significant",
  "structural_assessment": {
    "foundation": {
      "condition": "Good",
      "issues_identified": []
    },
    "framing": {
      "condition": "Good",
      "issues_identified": []
    },
    "roofing": {
      "material": "Built-Up Roof (BUR)",
      "age_years": 18,
      "condition": "Poor"
    }
  },
  "environmental_findings": {
    "phase_i_esa_status": "RECs Identified",
    "recognized_environmental_conditions": [
      {
        "type": "Historical Contamination",
        "description": "Room no return better information learn night us woman usually soldier.",
        "severity": "High",
        "recommended_action": "Recommend Phase II ESA to investigate historical contamination."
      },
      {
        "type": "Underground Storage Tank (UST)",
        "description": "Study popular enjoy dark never join strong employee dream third building.",
        "severity": "Low"
      },
      {
        "type": "Adjacent Property Concern",
        "description": "Conference three night return body capital again build.",
        "severity": "Moderate"
      }
    ],
    "asbestos_containing_materials_present": true,
    "lead_based_paint_present": false
  },
  "building_systems": [
    {
      "system_type": "HVAC",
      "components_summary": [
        {
          "component_name": "Chiller",
          "condition": "Poor",
          "estimated_lifespan_remaining_years": 13
        }
      ],
      "overall_system_condition": "Poor",
      "system_recommendations": "Recommend comprehensive review and budgeting for HVAC system upgrades."
    },
    {
      "system_type": "Plumbing",
      "components_summary": [
        {
          "component_name": "Supply Pipes",
          "condition": "Poor",
          "estimated_lifespan_remaining_years": 4
        },
        {
          "component_name": "Water Heaters",
          "condition": "Good"
        }
      ],
      "overall_system_condition": "Fair",
      "system_recommendations": "Recommend comprehensive review and budgeting for Plumbing system upgrades."
    }
  ],
  "title_encumbrances": [
    {
      "type": "Lien",
      "description": "Maxwell Inc holds a lien for implement frictionless functionalities.",
      "impact_assessment": "Significant"
    },
    {
      "type": "Encroachment",
      "description": "Salinas-Taylor holds a encroachment for evolve next-generation architectures.",
      "impact_assessment": "Significant"
    }
  ],
  "capital_expenditure_projections": [
    {
      "item": "Roof Replacement",
      "category": "Immediate Repair",
      "estimated_cost_usd": 184563,
      "timeline_years": 0
    },
    {
      "item": "Phase II ESA & Remediation",
      "category": "Environmental Mitigation",
      "estimated_cost_usd": 141817,
      "timeline_years": 2
    }
  ],
  "key_due_diligence_recommendations": [
    "Budget for full roof replacement within 12-24 months.",
    "Require seller to resolve existing mechanics lien prior to closing.",
    "Proceed with Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to quantify contamination."
  ],
  "estimated_remediation_cost_usd": 326380
}