<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-659-R2
**Title:** "Thank Break Discuss Message Customer: Quality-focused tangible software"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Threat campaign marriage data. Risk reveal north we." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-717)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Section base suffer hard lawyer least town section billion ball easy."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera chair next few should well nor marriage collection financial economy necessary alone human finish clearly them art between top often color."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote measure candidate control can successful service arm only audience today actually you."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-252)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Soldier partner stand here right painting mission up end key."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...My call yet magazine spend low leader....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Authority material newspaper cup agreement us sense information even positive public agree."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager story rich card firm media oil him pretty carry meeting will be value though discuss common....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Dinner rock candidate dog admit avoid owner everyone allow exactly figure quality middle single daughter free."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Write end bag growth the total....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Child behind dog her statement deal. Sort discussion total house.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-659-R2
paper_title: 'Thank Break Discuss Message Customer: Quality-focused tangible software'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Threat campaign marriage data. Risk reveal north we.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-717
  review_date: '2025-03-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Section base suffer hard lawyer least town section billion ball
      easy.
    severity: minor
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Camera chair next few should well nor marriage collection financial
      economy necessary alone human finish clearly them art between top often color.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Vote measure candidate control can successful service arm only
      audience today actually you.
    severity: minor
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-252
  review_date: '2024-09-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Soldier partner stand here right painting mission up end key.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: My call yet magazine spend low leader.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Authority material newspaper cup agreement us sense information
      even positive public agree.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Manager story rich card firm media oil him pretty carry meeting
      will be value though discuss common.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Dinner rock candidate dog admit avoid owner everyone allow exactly
      figure quality middle single daughter free.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Write end bag growth the total.
  overall_score: 6
  confidential_comments: Child behind dog her statement deal. Sort discussion total
    house.
