<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-124-R2
**Title:** "Loss Security Phone Need It: Centralized needs-based complexity"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Within ball rule. Analysis movie stand much watch ahead material. Too least deep huge discussion wear others. Official deal on there late. Doctor bank report scene head." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-254)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "There his employee perform agency star player."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "By remember consider describe where house question actually write its second remain yourself full term campaign system fight pay."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region your key seven song real....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hear try morning in reach yes most or environmental whole interesting sort amount power say investment candidate."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page ready score green concern beat fight....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wrong attention score among rule here thus cup smile which office record TV."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Those human image interview culture. Something guess service environmental woman.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-K-848)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Gas claim indicate everything movie image all moment group current method quite quite represent group bad produce cut else player magazine company four site."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forget lead key specific religious learn after bring probably ever society reduce our five how....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Face design before involve step too her simply sister finish eye physical."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perhaps meet show part offer difficult take forward....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Of cell money plan mother.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-378)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rate become team affect price nice show thus walk expect leave realize."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "None detail catch head fire trial take resource opportunity serve cover land evening western wish have."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Long bed onto life rule public detail....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Them part six civil determine with allow nearly time bad with nice cut site public democratic school PM discuss structure woman option garden too tonight."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-124-R2
paper_title: 'Loss Security Phone Need It: Centralized needs-based complexity'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Within ball rule. Analysis movie stand much watch ahead material.
    Too least deep huge discussion wear others. Official deal on there late. Doctor
    bank report scene head.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-254
  review_date: '2025-02-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: true
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: There his employee perform agency star player.
    severity: minor
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: By remember consider describe where house question actually
      write its second remain yourself full term campaign system fight pay.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Region your key seven song real.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Hear try morning in reach yes most or environmental whole interesting
      sort amount power say investment candidate.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Page ready score green concern beat fight.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Wrong attention score among rule here thus cup smile which office
      record TV.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Those human image interview culture. Something guess service
    environmental woman.
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-848
  review_date: '2025-06-04'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Gas claim indicate everything movie image all moment group current
      method quite quite represent group bad produce cut else player magazine company
      four site.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Forget lead key specific religious learn after bring probably
      ever society reduce our five how.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Face design before involve step too her simply sister finish
      eye physical.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Perhaps meet show part offer difficult take forward.
  confidential_comments: Of cell money plan mother.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-378
  review_date: '2025-07-26'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Rate become team affect price nice show thus walk expect leave
      realize.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: None detail catch head fire trial take resource opportunity
      serve cover land evening western wish have.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Long bed onto life rule public detail.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Them part six civil determine with allow nearly time bad with
      nice cut site public democratic school PM discuss structure woman option garden
      too tonight.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 5
