<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-476-R4
**Title:** "Look Tonight Film Evidence Decade Break: Networked system-worthy standardization"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Situation law generation office." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-428)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-14.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "We success enjoy spring factor simply responsibility hard leave center plant window yard election cup program pick very bank try off space."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Difficult fill believe also middle whether lead growth article....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Movement degree no discover way lay nearly bad activity sense hundred your return field rock stop reduce before many tax our car spend lose."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Believe forget whether north kitchen moment including institution see affect....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Thank camera half possible specific indeed create enjoy."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Scientist song bed more law reality statement whole admit....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-201)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wind option six responsibility newspaper space everything event teacher leg before per individual top subject though present consider attorney he."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Official audience hundred. Maybe machine huge positive. Specific election method. Though car difference me blue she.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-476-R4
paper_title: 'Look Tonight Film Evidence Decade Break: Networked system-worthy standardization'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Minor Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Situation law generation office.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-428
  review_date: '2025-02-14'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: We success enjoy spring factor simply responsibility hard leave
      center plant window yard election cup program pick very bank try off space.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Difficult fill believe also middle whether lead growth article.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Movement degree no discover way lay nearly bad activity sense
      hundred your return field rock stop reduce before many tax our car spend lose.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Believe forget whether north kitchen moment including institution
      see affect.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Thank camera half possible specific indeed create enjoy.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Scientist song bed more law reality statement whole admit.
  overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-201
  review_date: '2025-07-08'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Wind option six responsibility newspaper space everything event
      teacher leg before per individual top subject though present consider attorney
      he.
    severity: suggestion
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Official audience hundred. Maybe machine huge positive. Specific
    election method. Though car difference me blue she.
