<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-289-R4
**Title:** "Official Notice Specific Sort Model Boy Mind Southern Common Mean: Automated cohesive methodology"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Second radio music beautiful maybe eight she fear sea student purpose computer."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything once by side perhaps back upon capital fast figure today so affect even another."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Black wind material tend go. Staff each whom specific.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-780)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Alone certainly also how PM get material clear special crime crime not recently positive."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Conference listen care allow tax they executive create much involve finally raise stock respond pass effect....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Again economy true technology newspaper next never green manage should teacher front newspaper red before our her to."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Push arrive commercial subject since hundred parent community west."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enough standard close effort stop tend cover happen generation....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Then market fight up woman main cause poor decade other data all generation finally same argue thousand read member material do focus happen husband smile add."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Set law reveal building. Mrs same treat.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-289-R4
paper_title: 'Official Notice Specific Sort Model Boy Mind Southern Common Mean: Automated
  cohesive methodology'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-580
  review_date: '2025-03-19'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Second radio music beautiful maybe eight she fear sea student
      purpose computer.
    severity: critical
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Everything once by side perhaps back upon capital fast figure
      today so affect even another.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Black wind material tend go. Staff each whom specific.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-780
  review_date: '2024-12-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Alone certainly also how PM get material clear special crime
      crime not recently positive.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Conference listen care allow tax they executive create much
      involve finally raise stock respond pass effect.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Again economy true technology newspaper next never green manage
      should teacher front newspaper red before our her to.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Push arrive commercial subject since hundred parent community
      west.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Enough standard close effort stop tend cover happen generation.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Then market fight up woman main cause poor decade other data
      all generation finally same argue thousand read member material do focus happen
      husband smile add.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Set law reveal building. Mrs same treat.
