<format type="json">{report_id: string, property_address: {street: string, city: string, state: string, zip_code: string, parcel_id: string optional}, due_diligence_date: date, property_details: {property_type: string, lot_size_sqft: number optional, building_sqft: number optional, year_built: number optional}, environmental_findings: array of {report_type: string, date_of_report: date, consultant: string, findings: array of {contaminant_type: string, location: string, risk_level: string, remediation_required: boolean, estimated_cost: number optional}}, structural_findings: array of {report_type: string, date_of_report: date, consultant: string, issues: array of {issue_description: string, severity: string, recommendations: string, estimated_repair_cost: number optional}}, zoning_compliance: {current_zone: string, permitted_uses: array of string, non_conforming_issues: boolean, notes: string optional}, legal_encumbrances: array of {type: string, description: string, impact_on_property: string, cleared_status: boolean} optional, overall_risk_assessment: {summary_assessment: string, total_estimated_mitigation_cost: number optional, recommendation: string}}</format> <data>MEMORANDUM

TO: Investment Committee
FROM: Due Diligence Team
DATE: 2025-01-28
SUBJECT: Analysis of Property at 10993 Collins Mission Apt. 381, Sheppardview, Pennsylvania 54619 (Report ID: DDR-2025-156-Pennsylvania)

This report synthesizes the findings from our comprehensive due diligence on the subject property, a mixed-use facility reportedly constructed circa 1950. The site inspection was conducted under favorable weather conditions, which aided the external reviews. The property is currently zoned as R-3 General Commercial, which appears to align with its historical and intended use.

Environmental assessments, primarily conducted by Ochoa, Garcia and Reeves, identified several key issues. The most recent report dated 2024-09-19 highlighted a moderate risk of Lead-based paint in the Groundwater (est. cost: $133,111). This follows an initial Phase I that suggested the need for further subsurface investigation.

From a structural standpoint, the review from Ortiz Group was generally positive for a building of its age. However, they did flag the following items requiring attention: Nice enough why administration ever in the foundation. deemed 'critical' by the engineer (est. repair: $114,353). Their lead engineer, who has been in the field for over two decades, provided detailed recommendations in their full report.

The title search revealed 1 notable encumbrance(s), of which 1 have been marked as cleared. A standard utility easement along the eastern boundary, for instance, poses minimal impact on future development. Other items are pending review by legal counsel.

In conclusion, our analysis indicates a high risk proceed with caution. The cumulative financial exposure for the identified deficiencies is estimated to be in the region of $247,464, though this figure is preliminary. Based on these findings, our recommendation is as follows: Proceed only with significant seller concessions and a clear remediation plan. Further investigation is advised.</data>
{
  "report_id": "DDR-2025-156-Pennsylvania",
  "property_address": {
    "street": "10993 Collins Mission Apt. 381",
    "city": "Sheppardview",
    "state": "Pennsylvania",
    "zip_code": "54619",
    "parcel_id": "SHE-53463-1837"
  },
  "due_diligence_date": "2025-01-28",
  "property_details": {
    "property_type": "mixed-use",
    "lot_size_sqft": 333497,
    "year_built": 1950
  },
  "environmental_findings": [
    {
      "report_type": "Phase I ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2024-11-12",
      "consultant": "Ochoa, Garcia and Reeves",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_type": "Phase II ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2024-09-19",
      "consultant": "Hall-Mitchell",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "Lead-based paint",
          "location": "Groundwater",
          "risk_level": "moderate",
          "remediation_required": true,
          "estimated_cost": 133111
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "structural_findings": [
    {
      "report_type": "Structural Engineering Review",
      "date_of_report": "2024-05-07",
      "consultant": "Ortiz Group",
      "issues": [
        {
          "issue_description": "Nice enough why administration ever in the foundation.",
          "severity": "critical",
          "recommendations": "Factor unit after drug sort admit specific do less seat form protect.",
          "estimated_repair_cost": 114353
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "zoning_compliance": {
    "current_zone": "R-3 General Commercial",
    "permitted_uses": [
      "without",
      "discussion"
    ],
    "non_conforming_issues": true,
    "notes": "Everyone where participant could future buy anything."
  },
  "overall_risk_assessment": {
    "summary_assessment": "high_risk_proceed_with_caution",
    "recommendation": "Proceed only with significant seller concessions and a clear remediation plan. Further investigation is advised.",
    "total_estimated_mitigation_cost": 247464
  },
  "legal_encumbrances": [
    {
      "type": "Encroachment",
      "description": "Artist note report film beautiful dark.",
      "impact_on_property": "moderate",
      "cleared_status": true
    }
  ]
}