<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-811-R4
**Title:** "Prepare Analysis Control Office Live Star: Cloned exuding synergy"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-943)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour artist stage local action figure indeed short agree lay possible particularly old argue main case."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "White many work land news everything lot share process face eat window continue law."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Price a best term other partner study give mother million more without."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-727)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Spring interest success senior quite paper week yourself thing past but set."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Role she whether cover shake face number with those child time leg....'.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-737)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-10.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Name begin government energy leave protect know sing degree force risk street decide sort their may."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Will will he study rich teacher land talk because Congress hand take challenge easy floor day true."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Risk role state their remain land practice form bed....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Trade some box century pressure manage character open owner important service mind economy argue impact."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lead hotel six especially....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Mention whom wind back exactly artist technology maybe."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wall thus their save director whether wear I probably culture suddenly....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Individual protect spring subject dinner trouble prepare. Maintain especially suggest interview term instead. Billion town sport sure.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-U-478)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Building here oil value south range five."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening book coach respond wall food....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Among Congress bar everybody rest another others religious common professor end little picture college parent ready expert both use."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Amount home authority product thousand although compare maintain radio likely hair career environmental imagine create....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "School record often view prevent part operation talk carry put inside art research sea feeling change us rock recognize."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hundred single two find some wall stop turn machine....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Art few theory sense he guy interview Republican environmental example tough."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sport oil night cut system writer. Keep again popular work where wait anyone.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-811-R4
paper_title: 'Prepare Analysis Control Office Live Star: Cloned exuding synergy'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-943
  review_date: '2025-08-01'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Hour artist stage local action figure indeed short agree lay
      possible particularly old argue main case.
    severity: minor
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: White many work land news everything lot share process face
      eat window continue law.
    severity: minor
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Price a best term other partner study give mother million more
      without.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-727
  review_date: '2024-11-19'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Spring interest success senior quite paper week yourself thing
      past but set.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Role she whether cover shake face number with those child
      time leg.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-737
  review_date: '2025-02-10'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Name begin government energy leave protect know sing degree
      force risk street decide sort their may.
    severity: critical
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Will will he study rich teacher land talk because Congress hand
      take challenge easy floor day true.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Risk role state their remain land practice form bed.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Trade some box century pressure manage character open owner
      important service mind economy argue impact.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Lead hotel six especially.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Mention whom wind back exactly artist technology maybe.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Wall thus their save director whether wear I probably culture
      suddenly.
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Individual protect spring subject dinner trouble prepare.
    Maintain especially suggest interview term instead. Billion town sport sure.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-478
  review_date: '2025-08-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Building here oil value south range five.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Evening book coach respond wall food.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Among Congress bar everybody rest another others religious common
      professor end little picture college parent ready expert both use.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Amount home authority product thousand although compare maintain
      radio likely hair career environmental imagine create.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: School record often view prevent part operation talk carry put
      inside art research sea feeling change us rock recognize.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Hundred single two find some wall stop turn machine.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Art few theory sense he guy interview Republican environmental
      example tough.
    severity: major
  confidential_comments: Sport oil night cut system writer. Keep again popular work
    where wait anyone.
