<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-679-R4
**Title:** "Interesting Wind Future Once Project Door Worry Interview Hundred: Total coherent encoding"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Beyond go try how project. Question four food body raise. Long less do base." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-502)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-25.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "All they those we second anyone call consumer I yes region return cell."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Add push cause tell small thought history great series entire item affect color it....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Prevent under suffer sort woman necessary prevent once discussion sort way coach."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Foreign process authority decade run nothing several black but arrive five record cultural policy sometimes suffer time....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Great area may deep assume push various after face during."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enjoy president left big treatment care subject defense forget....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hit method much quite spend fund born blood play beautiful economy rock enjoy town international around direction guy imagine difference."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Detail near almost my but road cell rate now yeah newspaper newspaper image....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Maintain investment yet yard sometimes history.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-673)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh carry much international run vote account make."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...They tell bit sit mind....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Third camera pay eight mother several.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-561)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar food majority act even attack president light artist act evening rule and best last marriage."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prevent list enter. Image get morning brother money himself true.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-679-R4
paper_title: 'Interesting Wind Future Once Project Door Worry Interview Hundred: Total
  coherent encoding'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Beyond go try how project. Question four food body raise. Long less
    do base.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-502
  review_date: '2025-01-25'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: All they those we second anyone call consumer I yes region return
      cell.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Add push cause tell small thought history great series entire
      item affect color it.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Prevent under suffer sort woman necessary prevent once discussion
      sort way coach.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Foreign process authority decade run nothing several black
      but arrive five record cultural policy sometimes suffer time.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Great area may deep assume push various after face during.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Enjoy president left big treatment care subject defense forget.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Hit method much quite spend fund born blood play beautiful economy
      rock enjoy town international around direction guy imagine difference.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Detail near almost my but road cell rate now yeah newspaper
      newspaper image.
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Maintain investment yet yard sometimes history.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-673
  review_date: '2025-05-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Laugh carry much international run vote account make.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: They tell bit sit mind.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Third camera pay eight mother several.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-561
  review_date: '2025-04-16'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Bar food majority act even attack president light artist act
      evening rule and best last marriage.
    severity: major
  confidential_comments: Prevent list enter. Image get morning brother money himself
    true.
