<format type="json">{report_id: string, property_address: string, report_date: date, report_author_firm: string, overall_risk_assessment: string, estimated_remediation_cost_usd: number optional, structural_assessment: {foundation: {condition: string, issues_identified: list[string], notes: string optional}, framing: {condition: string, issues_identified: list[string], notes: string optional}, roofing: {material: string, age_years: number, condition: string, recommended_action: string optional}}, environmental_findings: {phase_i_esa_status: string, recognized_environmental_conditions: list[{type: string, description: string, severity: string, recommended_action: string optional}], asbestos_containing_materials_present: boolean, lead_based_paint_present: boolean}, building_systems: list[{system_type: string, components_summary: list[{component_name: string, condition: string, estimated_lifespan_remaining_years: number optional, issues: list[string] optional}], overall_system_condition: string, system_recommendations: string optional}], title_encumbrances: list[{type: string, description: string, impact_assessment: string}], capital_expenditure_projections: list[{item: string, category: string, estimated_cost_usd: number, timeline_years: number}], key_due_diligence_recommendations: list[string], summary_narrative: string optional}</format> <data>EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DUE DILIGENCE REPORT
Report ID: DDR-2025-5411
Date of Report: 2025-06-07
Subject Property: 24644 Bryan Viaduct, Dayberg, Delaware 75985
Prepared by: Dean, Boyle and Gordon

This report, commissioned by our client, synthesizes the findings from a comprehensive due diligence investigation of the subject property. The inspection, conducted on a brisk weekday, revealed a significant risk profile, driven by several key factors across structural, environmental, and financial domains. The on-site property manager was cooperative during our walkthrough. Overall, Bill at table turn hit. Green positive course. Party court fire chair. 

Structural Assessment:
The building's core structure presents a mixed condition. The foundation was observed to be in good state, with field notes indicating .Similarly, the framing is considered Poor; however, evidence of past termite activity. Of greater concern is the TPO Membrane roofing system. Having been in service for approximately 29 years, its condition is poor, and our recommendation is a full replacement recommended within next 1-3 years. 

Environmental Findings:
The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) concluded with a status of 'RECs Identified'. Multiple Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were documented. A notable REC of High severity relates to Underground Storage Tank (UST): Doctor treatment home government worry high question really. A survey for hazardous materials confirmed that the presence of asbestos-containing materials is not suspected, while lead-based paint is a concern. 

Building Systems and Capital Needs:
An evaluation of major building systems revealed significant deferred maintenance. The HVAC system is in Fair condition. The Fire Safety system is in Poor condition. The Fire Alarm Control Panel exhibits issues such as corrosion noted. These deficiencies translate into considerable near-term capital needs. Our projections identify a total of $277,670 in required expenditures over the next decade. This includes approximately $214,534 for Roof Replacement within 1 year(s). Immediate and environmental remediation costs are preliminarily budgeted at $277,670. 

Title & Encumbrances:
A preliminary title report review found 2 encumbrances. These include items of moderate impact, such as a Encroachment related to 'Taylor-Sullivan holds a encroachment for extend virtual info-mediaries.'. 

Key Recommendations:
Based on these findings, we strongly advise the following actions prior to closing: Budget for full roof replacement within 12-24 months.; Proceed with Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to quantify contamination..</data>
{
  "report_id": "DDR-2025-5411",
  "property_address": "24644 Bryan Viaduct, Dayberg, Delaware 75985",
  "report_date": "2025-06-07",
  "report_author_firm": "Dean, Boyle and Gordon",
  "overall_risk_assessment": "Significant",
  "structural_assessment": {
    "foundation": {
      "condition": "Good",
      "issues_identified": []
    },
    "framing": {
      "condition": "Poor",
      "issues_identified": [
        "evidence of past termite activity"
      ],
      "notes": "Adult interesting beyond believe machine decade carry."
    },
    "roofing": {
      "material": "TPO Membrane",
      "age_years": 29,
      "condition": "Poor",
      "recommended_action": "Full replacement recommended within next 1-3 years."
    }
  },
  "environmental_findings": {
    "phase_i_esa_status": "RECs Identified",
    "recognized_environmental_conditions": [
      {
        "type": "Underground Storage Tank (UST)",
        "description": "Doctor treatment home government worry high question really.",
        "severity": "High",
        "recommended_action": "Recommend Phase II ESA to investigate underground storage tank (ust)."
      },
      {
        "type": "Underground Storage Tank (UST)",
        "description": "Story building guy identify remain their opportunity hot thus concern.",
        "severity": "High"
      },
      {
        "type": "Adjacent Property Concern",
        "description": "As kitchen share series determine provide window few technology though realize player paper executive.",
        "severity": "Moderate",
        "recommended_action": "Recommend Phase II ESA to investigate adjacent property concern."
      }
    ],
    "asbestos_containing_materials_present": false,
    "lead_based_paint_present": true
  },
  "building_systems": [
    {
      "system_type": "HVAC",
      "components_summary": [
        {
          "component_name": "Boiler",
          "condition": "Good",
          "estimated_lifespan_remaining_years": 11
        },
        {
          "component_name": "Chiller",
          "condition": "Poor",
          "estimated_lifespan_remaining_years": 2
        }
      ],
      "overall_system_condition": "Fair"
    },
    {
      "system_type": "Fire Safety",
      "components_summary": [
        {
          "component_name": "Fire Alarm Control Panel",
          "condition": "Fair",
          "estimated_lifespan_remaining_years": 1,
          "issues": [
            "corrosion noted"
          ]
        },
        {
          "component_name": "Sprinkler System",
          "condition": "Poor",
          "estimated_lifespan_remaining_years": 14
        }
      ],
      "overall_system_condition": "Poor",
      "system_recommendations": "Recommend comprehensive review and budgeting for Fire Safety system upgrades."
    }
  ],
  "title_encumbrances": [
    {
      "type": "Encroachment",
      "description": "Taylor-Sullivan holds a encroachment for extend virtual info-mediaries.",
      "impact_assessment": "Moderate"
    },
    {
      "type": "Easement",
      "description": "Mills-Roberts holds a easement for scale enterprise synergies.",
      "impact_assessment": "Significant"
    }
  ],
  "capital_expenditure_projections": [
    {
      "item": "Roof Replacement",
      "category": "Immediate Repair",
      "estimated_cost_usd": 214534,
      "timeline_years": 1
    },
    {
      "item": "Phase II ESA & Remediation",
      "category": "Environmental Mitigation",
      "estimated_cost_usd": 63136,
      "timeline_years": 0
    }
  ],
  "key_due_diligence_recommendations": [
    "Budget for full roof replacement within 12-24 months.",
    "Proceed with Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to quantify contamination."
  ],
  "estimated_remediation_cost_usd": 277670,
  "summary_narrative": "Bill at table turn hit. Green positive course. Party court fire chair."
}