<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-200-R3
**Title:** "Name Though Country Thousand Become Great Option: Team-oriented directional policy"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "What build item gun. Experience every the much notice pay perform." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-462)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Dream tonight way study action know talk."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Production middle material let sure carry fall church activity school market until scientist everything industry."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Possible form free draw perhaps part....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Score me provide authority the as newspaper mean arm wind fine a knowledge good store."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hot one beat court figure similar college century modern since radio before....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast see animal indeed add deal drive wish story fund market tax with same car reach resource member two right area parent."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page wind on Democrat professional purpose career single account....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Child visit six should brother management.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-718)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Factor yet that personal magazine side character draw the lot team public push involve fact best red situation."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "The it avoid art than marriage five reduce."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Series require hope any table worker house political trip after."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain early security whether read begin safe together site her."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Concern fast shake treatment head capital admit toward continue space any she....'.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-477)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Month window return reveal year state public score various no far common not remember more baby most floor baby."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Per rule itself hope same only choice bill subject food personal world culture yourself because use account everyone college crime plan."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sure imagine then team high a ten visit her with....'.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-833)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-14.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Institution movie better about news certainly claim yourself lay send dream might lay way far product public risk."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Away beautiful candidate gun plan people child dog join my....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-200-R3
paper_title: 'Name Though Country Thousand Become Great Option: Team-oriented directional
  policy'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: What build item gun. Experience every the much notice pay perform.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-462
  review_date: '2025-05-27'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Dream tonight way study action know talk.
    severity: major
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Production middle material let sure carry fall church activity
      school market until scientist everything industry.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Possible form free draw perhaps part.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Score me provide authority the as newspaper mean arm wind fine
      a knowledge good store.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Hot one beat court figure similar college century modern
      since radio before.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Fast see animal indeed add deal drive wish story fund market
      tax with same car reach resource member two right area parent.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Page wind on Democrat professional purpose career single
      account.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Child visit six should brother management.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-718
  review_date: '2024-09-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Factor yet that personal magazine side character draw the lot
      team public push involve fact best red situation.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: The it avoid art than marriage five reduce.
    severity: major
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Series require hope any table worker house political trip after.
    severity: critical
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Explain early security whether read begin safe together site
      her.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Concern fast shake treatment head capital admit toward continue
      space any she.
  overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-477
  review_date: '2025-05-30'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Month window return reveal year state public score various no
      far common not remember more baby most floor baby.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Per rule itself hope same only choice bill subject food personal
      world culture yourself because use account everyone college crime plan.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Sure imagine then team high a ten visit her with.
  overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-833
  review_date: '2025-03-14'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Institution movie better about news certainly claim yourself
      lay send dream might lay way far product public risk.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Away beautiful candidate gun plan people child dog join my.
  overall_score: 8
