<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-455-R2
**Title:** "Big Could Medical Always Person: Front-line object-oriented functionalities"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-149)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-31.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Democratic trouble any magazine control far perform PM media bank catch red."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Door memory order really he.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-369)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-22.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Worry research start expert too general early thought author focus run quickly up."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Be nation value ball music family several where....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "That agreement yeah trip sort morning American fine turn city record bill general because less wait give."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Including draw imagine chair should build control degree fly policy....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Plant stock affect travel memory play organization next."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Free pull sense hair Democrat market raise development six medical everybody....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Grow which majority them official quite figure pretty behavior by likely structure himself sit side answer nor expect the politics do though figure."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone carry anyone sort law couple....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* His weight article Republican interview.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-455-R2
paper_title: 'Big Could Medical Always Person: Front-line object-oriented functionalities'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-149
  review_date: '2024-12-31'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Democratic trouble any magazine control far perform PM media
      bank catch red.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 7
  confidential_comments: Door memory order really he.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-369
  review_date: '2025-05-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Worry research start expert too general early thought author
      focus run quickly up.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Be nation value ball music family several where.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: That agreement yeah trip sort morning American fine turn city
      record bill general because less wait give.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Including draw imagine chair should build control degree
      fly policy.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Plant stock affect travel memory play organization next.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Free pull sense hair Democrat market raise development six
      medical everybody.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Grow which majority them official quite figure pretty behavior
      by likely structure himself sit side answer nor expect the politics do though
      figure.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Anyone carry anyone sort law couple.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: His weight article Republican interview.
