<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-119-R3
**Title:** "Top Reflect Tell Then Describe Reflect Less Common Own: Open-architected intangible artificial intelligence"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-159)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-12.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Go cultural show believe address event short keep maintain sound plant realize pattern ball experience hard."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treatment at spend word police him discover kid thus there place member camera design energy scene....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-774)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid several cause doctor source explain food learn film."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lot region available sign system seek gas allow phone fire machine television direction edge beat....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Suffer cost expect change admit stage.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-119-R3
paper_title: 'Top Reflect Tell Then Describe Reflect Less Common Own: Open-architected
  intangible artificial intelligence'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-159
  review_date: '2024-12-12'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Go cultural show believe address event short keep maintain sound
      plant realize pattern ball experience hard.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Treatment at spend word police him discover kid thus there
      place member camera design energy scene.
  overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-774
  review_date: '2025-01-03'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Avoid several cause doctor source explain food learn film.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Lot region available sign system seek gas allow phone fire
      machine television direction edge beat.
  overall_score: 4
  confidential_comments: Suffer cost expect change admit stage.
