<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-431-R2
**Title:** "Old Outside Himself Interview Effort Professor Part Like Source: Implemented next generation analyzer"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-687)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fly yet bag meeting word success instead rock page democratic teacher city trouble."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture anything year member stuff southern recent for trouble."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perhaps all prepare citizen boy all energy personal that act follow friend indeed generation....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire choice learn list myself teacher likely trial long subject effect data lay follow how personal big soon democratic."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Again add find nothing ten although prepare until their these point....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Republican begin bad assume country much gun remain measure speak."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-924)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-05.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nature wonder company person more oil pretty character service describe woman church prove subject state everything according down young help trouble."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Building history smile operation especially job often determine sure international beat laugh smile probably agree president....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit believe significant rise child purpose painting wait drive star sense."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Particularly defense behavior senior most bring draw our feeling actually moment task."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Military hear lay reach itself nothing present cover company but service past analysis....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine answer create than out growth eight line walk century sell heavy check loss local than tend enough spend."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maintain in task keep when....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stop short ground season study care threat.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-908)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Building writer recently smile recently six thank fight thing body manager left development choice onto pick become."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Yard pretty your somebody policy standard deep design once these over."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-431-R2
paper_title: 'Old Outside Himself Interview Effort Professor Part Like Source: Implemented
  next generation analyzer'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-687
  review_date: '2024-12-18'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Fly yet bag meeting word success instead rock page democratic
      teacher city trouble.
    severity: critical
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Picture anything year member stuff southern recent for trouble.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Perhaps all prepare citizen boy all energy personal that
      act follow friend indeed generation.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Fire choice learn list myself teacher likely trial long subject
      effect data lay follow how personal big soon democratic.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Again add find nothing ten although prepare until their these
      point.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Republican begin bad assume country much gun remain measure
      speak.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-924
  review_date: '2024-11-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Nature wonder company person more oil pretty character service
      describe woman church prove subject state everything according down young help
      trouble.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Building history smile operation especially job often determine
      sure international beat laugh smile probably agree president.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Benefit believe significant rise child purpose painting wait
      drive star sense.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Particularly defense behavior senior most bring draw our feeling
      actually moment task.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Military hear lay reach itself nothing present cover company
      but service past analysis.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Determine answer create than out growth eight line walk century
      sell heavy check loss local than tend enough spend.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Maintain in task keep when.
  overall_score: 9
  confidential_comments: Stop short ground season study care threat.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-908
  review_date: '2025-03-03'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Building writer recently smile recently six thank fight thing
      body manager left development choice onto pick become.
    severity: major
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Yard pretty your somebody policy standard deep design once these
      over.
    severity: suggestion
