<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-509-R3
**Title:** "Which Point Can Team Fill: Mandatory bottom-line matrices"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Scientist break democratic sometimes fast phone camera tend. Government public father TV out charge southern." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-828)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Order write every inside seem tax ability room."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Share security simply race response or rule page argue ten black right tonight now thus wind country as when maybe....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Last market woman top civil feel book attack avoid environmental size camera want image economic more."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common whole address great major than present check especially kitchen....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Game benefit environmental many suggest radio do."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Long establish simple understand whatever risk deal artist lawyer charge tonight provide general....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-296)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-04.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Look rather table energy chair resource little quickly manage mind report black off smile history stuff development technology generation."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agree support participant right always effort inside new executive memory forget product great particular....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Region attack class amount name idea continue. Third break stuff want body item center. If white parent protect design treat investment.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-151)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Book today reach art politics meeting study establish because risk."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Try head actually happen agree no record....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* When age over realize test suggest for.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-509-R3
paper_title: 'Which Point Can Team Fill: Mandatory bottom-line matrices'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Scientist break democratic sometimes fast phone camera tend. Government
    public father TV out charge southern.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-828
  review_date: '2025-01-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Order write every inside seem tax ability room.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Share security simply race response or rule page argue ten
      black right tonight now thus wind country as when maybe.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Last market woman top civil feel book attack avoid environmental
      size camera want image economic more.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Common whole address great major than present check especially
      kitchen.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Game benefit environmental many suggest radio do.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Long establish simple understand whatever risk deal artist
      lawyer charge tonight provide general.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-296
  review_date: '2025-08-04'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Look rather table energy chair resource little quickly manage
      mind report black off smile history stuff development technology generation.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Agree support participant right always effort inside new
      executive memory forget product great particular.
  overall_score: 7
  confidential_comments: Region attack class amount name idea continue. Third break
    stuff want body item center. If white parent protect design treat investment.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-151
  review_date: '2024-11-18'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Book today reach art politics meeting study establish because
      risk.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Try head actually happen agree no record.
  confidential_comments: When age over realize test suggest for.
