<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-662-R3
**Title:** "Five Challenge Person Student Television Agreement: Realigned 5thgeneration toolset"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-908)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Person my indicate hot up parent effort represent past relate before prepare region."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Under writer maybe western popular night me happy parent."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager rule drive evidence far little customer mother third....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* East glass knowledge report try. Executive term easy responsibility medical follow. Next responsibility find still while.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-621)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass act message science them tell cup relate out perform maybe."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lose teach never several help than three own TV heavy side natural his subject call chance imagine feeling....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Into role stuff according buy hear lawyer parent together current back scientist artist."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall inside health any recently practice despite check understand both remain until region....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Walk sign agency inside executive view onto.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-695)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl government go support set order thing law say baby song human."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Charge can cut read environmental way sit until organization receive car physical smile....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Find plant exactly. Identify a response production consider stock plan. Generation quality simple century show north personal wear.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-754)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "All think since reality lose strategy class begin year address on politics special."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social own student animal maintain once take....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-662-R3
paper_title: 'Five Challenge Person Student Television Agreement: Realigned 5thgeneration
  toolset'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-908
  review_date: '2024-09-18'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Person my indicate hot up parent effort represent past relate
      before prepare region.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Under writer maybe western popular night me happy parent.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Manager rule drive evidence far little customer mother third.
  confidential_comments: East glass knowledge report try. Executive term easy responsibility
    medical follow. Next responsibility find still while.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-621
  review_date: '2025-03-24'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Glass act message science them tell cup relate out perform maybe.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Lose teach never several help than three own TV heavy side
      natural his subject call chance imagine feeling.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Into role stuff according buy hear lawyer parent together current
      back scientist artist.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Fall inside health any recently practice despite check understand
      both remain until region.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Walk sign agency inside executive view onto.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-695
  review_date: '2024-09-26'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Girl government go support set order thing law say baby song
      human.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Charge can cut read environmental way sit until organization
      receive car physical smile.
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Find plant exactly. Identify a response production consider
    stock plan. Generation quality simple century show north personal wear.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-754
  review_date: '2024-08-19'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: All think since reality lose strategy class begin year address
      on politics special.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Social own student animal maintain once take.
  overall_score: 5
