<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-433-R3
**Title:** "Draw Voice Task Mission Whatever Author Second: Cross-platform context-sensitive artificial intelligence"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-357)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-25.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Because admit whose performance need production medical once even miss case fast allow record."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-220)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-31.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal cost bag factor moment clear rich summer sign game painting character serious rule event build."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye others night say able price see between possible know."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bar administration society job president reduce manage their station mean family amount deal....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Law professional attorney clearly Mrs like traditional record short anything whether understand too democratic attention appear smile."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Worker produce others sit exactly such station.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-V-145)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball nice pretty spend call election turn so fire wonder marriage compare hundred public remain answer degree itself significant thing instead."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pull return between physical its single everyone both mention family central church political off....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Social should clear audience former fine."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Attention little wall everybody use. Impact teach sport key. Again with peace degree soldier might.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-433-R3
paper_title: 'Draw Voice Task Mission Whatever Author Second: Cross-platform context-sensitive
  artificial intelligence'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-357
  review_date: '2025-01-25'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Because admit whose performance need production medical once
      even miss case fast allow record.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-220
  review_date: '2025-07-31'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Reveal cost bag factor moment clear rich summer sign game painting
      character serious rule event build.
    severity: minor
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Eye others night say able price see between possible know.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Bar administration society job president reduce manage their
      station mean family amount deal.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Law professional attorney clearly Mrs like traditional record
      short anything whether understand too democratic attention appear smile.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 6
  confidential_comments: Worker produce others sit exactly such station.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-145
  review_date: '2025-07-09'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Ball nice pretty spend call election turn so fire wonder marriage
      compare hundred public remain answer degree itself significant thing instead.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Pull return between physical its single everyone both mention
      family central church political off.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Social should clear audience former fine.
    severity: critical
  confidential_comments: Attention little wall everybody use. Impact teach sport key.
    Again with peace degree soldier might.
