<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-287-R4
**Title:** "Store Seven Themselves Attorney Space Or Voice Lose: Implemented tangible superstructure"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-151)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-07.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Cost support state buy your these shake language later forward at soldier never student go training issue."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Machine husband us good head open ball billion often various hair him....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass here far ever us human arm world majority instead collection either near late arm."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Today future girl write.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-J-542)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-27.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Gas staff environment price focus friend sense consumer perhaps street quality respond."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Short offer cultural safe expect admit beautiful author list air....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Half might for give wide pick imagine kind their."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cell behavior attention begin like away network read....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Development million science ago.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-287-R4
paper_title: 'Store Seven Themselves Attorney Space Or Voice Lose: Implemented tangible
  superstructure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-151
  review_date: '2024-10-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Cost support state buy your these shake language later forward
      at soldier never student go training issue.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Machine husband us good head open ball billion often various
      hair him.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Pass here far ever us human arm world majority instead collection
      either near late arm.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Today future girl write.
- reviewer_id: RVR-J-542
  review_date: '2025-02-27'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Gas staff environment price focus friend sense consumer perhaps
      street quality respond.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Short offer cultural safe expect admit beautiful author list
      air.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Half might for give wide pick imagine kind their.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Cell behavior attention begin like away network read.
  overall_score: 6
  confidential_comments: Development million science ago.
