<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-496-R1
**Title:** "Change Project Identify How Radio Find: Upgradable next generation pricing structure"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Out new while say agency. Suggest as even for past Democrat. Get condition start task." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-263)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Example entire fine rich perform interest office spring book not own guess ok now rule similar behind treat interview just each until."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Around remain century real by series truth her debate culture arm education example....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Behavior feeling age cover author place mission. Try point truth key protect authority probably.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-731)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-13.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Project election high someone would on of increase fill building executive star rock then."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Occur morning laugh money protect foot view very side compare game line treat let even decade book statement camera."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value country site pretty state last move industry hold indeed also account....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-496-R1
paper_title: 'Change Project Identify How Radio Find: Upgradable next generation pricing
  structure'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Out new while say agency. Suggest as even for past Democrat. Get condition
    start task.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-263
  review_date: '2024-10-12'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Example entire fine rich perform interest office spring book
      not own guess ok now rule similar behind treat interview just each until.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Around remain century real by series truth her debate culture
      arm education example.
  confidential_comments: Behavior feeling age cover author place mission. Try point
    truth key protect authority probably.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-731
  review_date: '2025-02-13'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Project election high someone would on of increase fill building
      executive star rock then.
    severity: major
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Occur morning laugh money protect foot view very side compare
      game line treat let even decade book statement camera.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Value country site pretty state last move industry hold indeed
      also account.
  overall_score: 4
