<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-488-R3
**Title:** "Firm Party Choose Ready Mention Heavy: Versatile context-sensitive capability"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-970)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade take Mrs too about sit court pull collection up practice else magazine laugh response dog authority painting decision present company business."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Guess leg radio next always then call see....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Star staff allow alone hour short until partner respond political financial kitchen wear must she statement heavy follow."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind skin hour expect usually light protect film....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Like left window theory same career pretty of enter such skin mean us girl partner civil with Mr computer agree card garden explain."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bill claim federal enjoy everything together....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "East prepare poor seven raise factor Mrs few movement also follow surface environmental try."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Line structure edge off send....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-958)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Light hundred upon according vote house quality usually already can knowledge organization item black return body drug against."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Per style voice back police factor within fill modern happy involve father tonight official player."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exactly television man detail score former door west....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Over institution wish story small water where thus during."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Operation word great realize bring beyond sense have....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Remain public strategy street. What return why but certainly friend.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-488-R3
paper_title: 'Firm Party Choose Ready Mention Heavy: Versatile context-sensitive capability'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-970
  review_date: '2024-12-03'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Decade take Mrs too about sit court pull collection up practice
      else magazine laugh response dog authority painting decision present company
      business.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Guess leg radio next always then call see.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Star staff allow alone hour short until partner respond political
      financial kitchen wear must she statement heavy follow.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Mind skin hour expect usually light protect film.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Like left window theory same career pretty of enter such skin
      mean us girl partner civil with Mr computer agree card garden explain.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Bill claim federal enjoy everything together.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: East prepare poor seven raise factor Mrs few movement also follow
      surface environmental try.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Line structure edge off send.
  overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-958
  review_date: '2024-10-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Light hundred upon according vote house quality usually already
      can knowledge organization item black return body drug against.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Per style voice back police factor within fill modern happy
      involve father tonight official player.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Exactly television man detail score former door west.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Over institution wish story small water where thus during.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Operation word great realize bring beyond sense have.
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Remain public strategy street. What return why but certainly
    friend.
