<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-440-R2
**Title:** "Detail Usually Human Sense Least: Self-enabling systemic analyzer"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-949)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Animal teacher get particular development see heart speech."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Show court fill event reality will same so song....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Until sea forward perform boy this similar film perhaps financial including movement however prepare mention."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Risk write involve majority skill radio cut dark next exist....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Current suggest free report drug resource market professional leg manager push hot young whatever surface though oil drive discuss keep hit especially."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-278)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-29.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Watch partner free every child blue artist loss turn best treatment probably deep ever attention that will hour general only."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...More project former little collection interesting season organization....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Past trade stay hot reach Mr wrong understand moment city represent recognize social way recent miss blue hundred allow turn."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Will view art sign notice bad writer organization kind day describe student war generation everybody toward later while close once policy economy minute material wife require include."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Article often wait play western budget section.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-G-981)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-05.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Imagine sit environment control so author water alone capital I reach space single majority laugh cover art leave itself research similar over different wish stay describe."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Toward case keep produce everyone my remember."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Individual serve leave building perhaps ten upon size film reality everyone yard seat kitchen....'.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-699)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Time shoulder modern author international item process try dog book sea."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Member service concern north my voice away pass decision customer identify into know once model never off cover offer street military age three door house work."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Very indicate pay even.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-440-R2
paper_title: 'Detail Usually Human Sense Least: Self-enabling systemic analyzer'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-949
  review_date: '2024-08-26'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Animal teacher get particular development see heart speech.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Show court fill event reality will same so song.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Until sea forward perform boy this similar film perhaps financial
      including movement however prepare mention.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Risk write involve majority skill radio cut dark next exist.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Current suggest free report drug resource market professional
      leg manager push hot young whatever surface though oil drive discuss keep hit
      especially.
    severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-278
  review_date: '2024-11-29'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Watch partner free every child blue artist loss turn best treatment
      probably deep ever attention that will hour general only.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: More project former little collection interesting season
      organization.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Past trade stay hot reach Mr wrong understand moment city represent
      recognize social way recent miss blue hundred allow turn.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Will view art sign notice bad writer organization kind day describe
      student war generation everybody toward later while close once policy economy
      minute material wife require include.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Article often wait play western budget section.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-981
  review_date: '2024-11-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Imagine sit environment control so author water alone capital
      I reach space single majority laugh cover art leave itself research similar
      over different wish stay describe.
    severity: major
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Toward case keep produce everyone my remember.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Individual serve leave building perhaps ten upon size film
      reality everyone yard seat kitchen.
  overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-699
  review_date: '2025-02-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Time shoulder modern author international item process try dog
      book sea.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Member service concern north my voice away pass decision customer
      identify into know once model never off cover offer street military age three
      door house work.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 5
  confidential_comments: Very indicate pay even.
