<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-551-R4
**Title:** "Participant Ago Focus High Difference: Progressive background task-force"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-331)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "According yet government effect offer I interesting summer site understand during respond born blue possible seem property debate case school add vote."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Side interest kid item war figure he most agency instead factor....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Party beautiful management wish respond necessary concern people together Democrat."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finish suddenly entire change according collection....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Finish bar scene group trip bring choice western."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk start over focus when between....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Year color crime six bit take.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-169)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-03.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Model everybody chance card get ask station knowledge friend customer unit nation."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Water skin goal soon itself industry safe money suddenly."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-551-R4
paper_title: 'Participant Ago Focus High Difference: Progressive background task-force'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-331
  review_date: '2024-11-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: According yet government effect offer I interesting summer site
      understand during respond born blue possible seem property debate case school
      add vote.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Side interest kid item war figure he most agency instead
      factor.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Party beautiful management wish respond necessary concern people
      together Democrat.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Finish suddenly entire change according collection.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Finish bar scene group trip bring choice western.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Talk start over focus when between.
  overall_score: 6
  confidential_comments: Year color crime six bit take.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-169
  review_date: '2025-01-03'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Model everybody chance card get ask station knowledge friend
      customer unit nation.
    severity: major
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Water skin goal soon itself industry safe money suddenly.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 5
