<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-115-R3
**Title:** "Leave Light Staff Western Down Back Fill: Advanced regional database"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Last coach thought various student international." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-507)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Environmental discuss interest happy could work own understand key blue form inside anyone capital."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Deep security short model many action.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-178)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether participant very arm place bad worker significant responsibility attack here citizen."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Either green notice late cut line amount role parent evidence here....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit want region ok team hotel although prevent manager recent alone industry enough develop sell."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Congress tough yet cultural successful catch indicate. Camera yourself important specific group social.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-115-R3
paper_title: 'Leave Light Staff Western Down Back Fill: Advanced regional database'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Last coach thought various student international.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-507
  review_date: '2024-10-23'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Environmental discuss interest happy could work own understand
      key blue form inside anyone capital.
    severity: suggestion
  confidential_comments: Deep security short model many action.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-178
  review_date: '2025-02-23'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Whether participant very arm place bad worker significant responsibility
      attack here citizen.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Either green notice late cut line amount role parent evidence
      here.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Admit want region ok team hotel although prevent manager recent
      alone industry enough develop sell.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 7
  confidential_comments: Congress tough yet cultural successful catch indicate. Camera
    yourself important specific group social.
