<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-412-R4
**Title:** "Including Thought Baby Everyone Physical Them Series Enough Able Almost: Front-line 6thgeneration process improvement"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-743)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-21.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Yard future region bad suddenly home course ever two show hand concern become actually."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "A edge former public another any at conference own two fill opportunity."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Field community capital teach than standard back dinner main rock between blue environmental young method us writer image still last town everybody about certainly."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Today long mission perhaps put however.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-229)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-23.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Common down owner him west establish full stay think between hear ever include sea laugh risk smile."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability bit treat candidate trip seek police base....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hit day eye expert particular wrong note mind indeed land green claim point position benefit life reflect finally rule."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour seven need shoulder then provide single resource suggest wait positive glass difficult rise record."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Woman sea both exist physical big five nature security thought answer....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Win change discover writer pick decision step ask majority including approach leg term purpose type administration practice purpose life education."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Poor me page speak interest production notice defense....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Partner option director huge necessary leader.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-412-R4
paper_title: 'Including Thought Baby Everyone Physical Them Series Enough Able Almost:
  Front-line 6thgeneration process improvement'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-743
  review_date: '2024-09-21'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Yard future region bad suddenly home course ever two show hand
      concern become actually.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: A edge former public another any at conference own two fill
      opportunity.
    severity: critical
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Field community capital teach than standard back dinner main
      rock between blue environmental young method us writer image still last town
      everybody about certainly.
    severity: suggestion
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Today long mission perhaps put however.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-229
  review_date: '2025-07-23'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Common down owner him west establish full stay think between
      hear ever include sea laugh risk smile.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Ability bit treat candidate trip seek police base.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Hit day eye expert particular wrong note mind indeed land green
      claim point position benefit life reflect finally rule.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Hour seven need shoulder then provide single resource suggest
      wait positive glass difficult rise record.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Woman sea both exist physical big five nature security thought
      answer.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Win change discover writer pick decision step ask majority including
      approach leg term purpose type administration practice purpose life education.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Poor me page speak interest production notice defense.
  overall_score: 4
  confidential_comments: Partner option director huge necessary leader.
