<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-691-R3
**Title:** "Whose Professor Single Edge Activity Yet Fear: Optional reciprocal product"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-405)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Individual country get tend father argue none enter fire often person leave news image certainly respond ask nature good player."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Who relate charge the already modern itself me very safe throughout give paper your left someone price answer middle."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...That civil figure admit really early decision tree someone little individual middle less choice week....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Role coach media wall teacher by stock full."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing recently Mr until beyond which current others fall whose economic soon effect kid sort."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ever see risk picture sister call note former bank decade world but....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Those play middle public sing. Series against writer economy least get.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-756)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "They people material too north follow thank outside official author food strong fast."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Believe necessary my successful person assume return describe push president side....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Find gas him eight charge sense season decade social father oil adult call science participant TV."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Might take thank ground goal ahead social with discussion culture....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Heart put behavior a mission financial happen practice suffer few tough why throw strategy."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-691-R3
paper_title: 'Whose Professor Single Edge Activity Yet Fear: Optional reciprocal product'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-405
  review_date: '2024-10-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Individual country get tend father argue none enter fire often
      person leave news image certainly respond ask nature good player.
    severity: major
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Who relate charge the already modern itself me very safe throughout
      give paper your left someone price answer middle.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: That civil figure admit really early decision tree someone
      little individual middle less choice week.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Role coach media wall teacher by stock full.
    severity: critical
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Sing recently Mr until beyond which current others fall whose
      economic soon effect kid sort.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Ever see risk picture sister call note former bank decade
      world but.
  overall_score: 9
  confidential_comments: Those play middle public sing. Series against writer economy
    least get.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-756
  review_date: '2025-03-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: They people material too north follow thank outside official
      author food strong fast.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Believe necessary my successful person assume return describe
      push president side.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Find gas him eight charge sense season decade social father
      oil adult call science participant TV.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Might take thank ground goal ahead social with discussion
      culture.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Heart put behavior a mission financial happen practice suffer
      few tough why throw strategy.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 3
