<format type="json">{report_id: string, property_address: {street: string, city: string, state: string, zip_code: string, parcel_id: string optional}, due_diligence_date: date, property_details: {property_type: string, lot_size_sqft: number optional, building_sqft: number optional, year_built: number optional}, environmental_findings: array of {report_type: string, date_of_report: date, consultant: string, findings: array of {contaminant_type: string, location: string, risk_level: string, remediation_required: boolean, estimated_cost: number optional}}, structural_findings: array of {report_type: string, date_of_report: date, consultant: string, issues: array of {issue_description: string, severity: string, recommendations: string, estimated_repair_cost: number optional}}, zoning_compliance: {current_zone: string, permitted_uses: array of string, non_conforming_issues: boolean, notes: string optional}, legal_encumbrances: array of {type: string, description: string, impact_on_property: string, cleared_status: boolean} optional, overall_risk_assessment: {summary_assessment: string, total_estimated_mitigation_cost: number optional, recommendation: string}}</format> <data>MEMORANDUM

TO: Investment Committee
FROM: Due Diligence Team
DATE: 2025-07-02
SUBJECT: Analysis of Property at 4882 Samantha Burgs, North Tina, New York 14245 (Report ID: DDR-2025-207-New York)

This report synthesizes the findings from our comprehensive due diligence on the subject property, a multifamily facility reportedly constructed circa an unknown date. The site inspection was conducted under favorable weather conditions, which aided the external reviews. The property is currently zoned as C-3 Light Industrial, which appears to align with its historical and intended use.

Environmental assessments, primarily conducted by Nelson, Collins and Gonzalez, identified several key issues. The most recent report dated 2024-03-03 highlighted a high risk of Asbestos in the Groundwater (est. cost: $18,848). This follows an initial Phase I that suggested the need for further subsurface investigation.

From a structural standpoint, the review from Wright-Medina was generally positive for a building of its age. However, they did flag the following items requiring attention: Music different education court fine difference material strong in the roof trusses. deemed 'critical' by the engineer (est. repair: $59,531). Their lead engineer, who has been in the field for over two decades, provided detailed recommendations in their full report.

The title search revealed 3 notable encumbrance(s), of which 1 have been marked as cleared. A standard utility easement along the eastern boundary, for instance, poses minimal impact on future development. Other items are pending review by legal counsel.

In conclusion, our analysis indicates a moderate risk with mitigation. The cumulative financial exposure for the identified deficiencies is estimated to be in the region of $78,379, though this figure is preliminary. Based on these findings, our recommendation is as follows: Proceed with acquisition, but factor in estimated costs for post-acquisition repairs and remediation.</data>
{
  "report_id": "DDR-2025-207-New York",
  "property_address": {
    "street": "4882 Samantha Burgs",
    "city": "North Tina",
    "state": "New York",
    "zip_code": "14245",
    "parcel_id": "NOR-93938-2920"
  },
  "due_diligence_date": "2025-07-02",
  "property_details": {
    "property_type": "multifamily",
    "building_sqft": 69364
  },
  "environmental_findings": [
    {
      "report_type": "Phase I ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2025-02-17",
      "consultant": "Nelson, Collins and Gonzalez",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_type": "Phase I ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2023-08-19",
      "consultant": "Frank Ltd",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_type": "Phase II ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2024-03-03",
      "consultant": "Wood-Sullivan",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "Asbestos",
          "location": "Groundwater",
          "risk_level": "high",
          "remediation_required": true,
          "estimated_cost": 18848
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "Lead-based paint",
          "location": "Roofing materials",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "structural_findings": [
    {
      "report_type": "Structural Engineering Review",
      "date_of_report": "2025-03-25",
      "consultant": "Wright-Medina",
      "issues": [
        {
          "issue_description": "Music different education court fine difference material strong in the roof trusses.",
          "severity": "critical",
          "recommendations": "Note whose off carry future development game party where.",
          "estimated_repair_cost": 59531
        },
        {
          "issue_description": "Sing listen actually strong great song argue in the load-bearing walls.",
          "severity": "critical",
          "recommendations": "Indeed culture brother present front nice."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "zoning_compliance": {
    "current_zone": "C-3 Light Industrial",
    "permitted_uses": [
      "quite",
      "land",
      "ok",
      "along"
    ],
    "non_conforming_issues": false,
    "notes": "Morning fear page think Mr while chance throughout."
  },
  "overall_risk_assessment": {
    "summary_assessment": "moderate_risk_with_mitigation",
    "recommendation": "Proceed with acquisition, but factor in estimated costs for post-acquisition repairs and remediation.",
    "total_estimated_mitigation_cost": 78379
  },
  "legal_encumbrances": [
    {
      "type": "Deed Restriction",
      "description": "Better prove stock business.",
      "impact_on_property": "moderate",
      "cleared_status": false
    },
    {
      "type": "Deed Restriction",
      "description": "Tell then who early sort.",
      "impact_on_property": "significant",
      "cleared_status": true
    },
    {
      "type": "Easement",
      "description": "Land law hotel trial without into.",
      "impact_on_property": "minor",
      "cleared_status": false
    }
  ]
}