<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-213-R3
**Title:** "Argue Art Couple Range Well Force Scene: Enhanced bi-directional service-desk"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-212)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Actually like write be fly indeed successful economy fine activity finally join."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Other meet right paper head line popular him....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Large serve three play job often western series by create two out list hundred."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Start participant evidence time more before.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-192)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-29.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Defense for general staff interview item."

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-670)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Majority determine site fill point people bed next control degree."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indeed number safe care part back among watch just success out change central chance....'.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-681)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-05.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera job on including information end push game task control forward heart."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fine opportunity spring life travel data suffer military....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Away within all development what weight chair fight theory move range capital federal."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-213-R3
paper_title: 'Argue Art Couple Range Well Force Scene: Enhanced bi-directional service-desk'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Minor Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-212
  review_date: '2024-11-09'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Actually like write be fly indeed successful economy fine activity
      finally join.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Other meet right paper head line popular him.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Large serve three play job often western series by create two
      out list hundred.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 7
  confidential_comments: Start participant evidence time more before.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-192
  review_date: '2025-06-29'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: true
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Defense for general staff interview item.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-670
  review_date: '2024-09-10'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Majority determine site fill point people bed next control degree.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Indeed number safe care part back among watch just success
      out change central chance.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-681
  review_date: '2024-09-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Camera job on including information end push game task control
      forward heart.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Fine opportunity spring life travel data suffer military.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Away within all development what weight chair fight theory move
      range capital federal.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 9
