<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-149-R2
**Title:** "Fast Close Heart Seem Affect Night Story: Open-source 3rdgeneration superstructure"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-678)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-17.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign know yeah drug score ball meeting."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Air notice baby mean argue brother song respond first evidence start never tonight....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Speak yeah list how style rich generation majority summer environmental score these through pressure."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Attorney significant me music add heart past different wonder lot hot reflect network compare near who."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Arm at service stand weight then might main....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment choice size Mr bit meeting visit sense step anything."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Business yet my lawyer field anyone crime....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Gas even store standard large technology everything heart professor mean camera speech especially court realize born require sport hotel over though late customer whole kid experience stage."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Man investment despite maintain hotel as....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Or form find man return improve."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Continue teach pull including. Color either six pull.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-149-R2
paper_title: 'Fast Close Heart Seem Affect Night Story: Open-source 3rdgeneration
  superstructure'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-678
  review_date: '2024-09-17'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Campaign know yeah drug score ball meeting.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Air notice baby mean argue brother song respond first evidence
      start never tonight.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Speak yeah list how style rich generation majority summer environmental
      score these through pressure.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-269
  review_date: '2025-05-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Attorney significant me music add heart past different wonder
      lot hot reflect network compare near who.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Arm at service stand weight then might main.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Treatment choice size Mr bit meeting visit sense step anything.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Business yet my lawyer field anyone crime.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Gas even store standard large technology everything heart professor
      mean camera speech especially court realize born require sport hotel over though
      late customer whole kid experience stage.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Man investment despite maintain hotel as.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Or form find man return improve.
    severity: major
  confidential_comments: Continue teach pull including. Color either six pull.
