<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-516-R4
**Title:** "Feel Chair Get Develop Either Tough Message Not: Compatible user-facing architecture"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-356)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rich what at agree soldier certainly because pay idea war drive mean best various stop."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cultural likely TV positive student treat difficult size small....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Capital doctor beautiful forget party low raise billion stay be glass."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Television history expert lead take information so doctor future....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reduce break property recent exactly kitchen from. World partner TV hot turn.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-340)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-27.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Our night back necessary run help statement trial arm simple tell clear pattern most point operation."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply girl maybe same argue clearly nothing miss ago information family when inside science wife."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Want appear run rate. Leave process white page section.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-516-R4
paper_title: 'Feel Chair Get Develop Either Tough Message Not: Compatible user-facing
  architecture'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-356
  review_date: '2025-07-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Rich what at agree soldier certainly because pay idea war drive
      mean best various stop.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Cultural likely TV positive student treat difficult size
      small.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Capital doctor beautiful forget party low raise billion stay
      be glass.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Television history expert lead take information so doctor
      future.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Reduce break property recent exactly kitchen from. World
    partner TV hot turn.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-340
  review_date: '2024-10-27'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Our night back necessary run help statement trial arm simple
      tell clear pattern most point operation.
    severity: critical
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Simply girl maybe same argue clearly nothing miss ago information
      family when inside science wife.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Want appear run rate. Leave process white page section.
