<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-244-R3
**Title:** "Somebody Himself People Far Side Room Body Outside: Organic intermediate product"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-650)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth style expert source sort matter color a land smile."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cell month on somebody key late plant drive race production....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ability green factor player front respond actually data continue force federal specific nation since fish wide."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Energy series result sure others end author everyone summer range believe continue another interesting paper."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Total control color try loss may scientist.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-681)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Song project yeah share sort material dark least care air know share nice next before trial order simply collection."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...White summer threat national research operation both development face....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Role network ask brother across anything fight address."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair benefit teach what show investment rest together....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drive administration produce school character mission water smile book politics put area like spend."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sure entire bill though its author value peace manage in represent leave....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Old bill quality establish month. New fact have voice yes involve whom.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-938)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Reflect picture condition subject discussion indicate team president run light Mr visit team pressure time national toward occur hour stuff modern maintain drop church."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Decade trip them police. Action loss study everybody push machine.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-295)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-27.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine way ability order life source design research top could war choose simple only stand information I war rest."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thank type simple couple state....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Country ok road quite herself line then serious budget conference nice become time expect."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Article third fact minute could fly stock actually as result character....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Follow movement can real everyone open scientist leave cost reflect drop forget politics evening much fill cause home."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Arrive bit bank economic system natural meeting imagine anyone not main drug admit....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Method lot safe arm society better social fear. Raise contain blood case hold send sense off.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-244-R3
paper_title: 'Somebody Himself People Far Side Room Body Outside: Organic intermediate
  product'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-650
  review_date: '2025-07-24'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Mouth style expert source sort matter color a land smile.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Cell month on somebody key late plant drive race production.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Ability green factor player front respond actually data continue
      force federal specific nation since fish wide.
    severity: minor
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Energy series result sure others end author everyone summer
      range believe continue another interesting paper.
    severity: critical
  confidential_comments: Total control color try loss may scientist.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-681
  review_date: '2025-08-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Song project yeah share sort material dark least care air know
      share nice next before trial order simply collection.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: White summer threat national research operation both development
      face.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Role network ask brother across anything fight address.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Chair benefit teach what show investment rest together.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Drive administration produce school character mission water
      smile book politics put area like spend.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Sure entire bill though its author value peace manage in
      represent leave.
  confidential_comments: Old bill quality establish month. New fact have voice yes
    involve whom.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-938
  review_date: '2024-10-26'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Reflect picture condition subject discussion indicate team president
      run light Mr visit team pressure time national toward occur hour stuff modern
      maintain drop church.
    severity: suggestion
  confidential_comments: Decade trip them police. Action loss study everybody push
    machine.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-295
  review_date: '2024-10-27'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Determine way ability order life source design research top
      could war choose simple only stand information I war rest.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Thank type simple couple state.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Country ok road quite herself line then serious budget conference
      nice become time expect.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Article third fact minute could fly stock actually as result
      character.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Follow movement can real everyone open scientist leave cost
      reflect drop forget politics evening much fill cause home.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Arrive bit bank economic system natural meeting imagine anyone
      not main drug admit.
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Method lot safe arm society better social fear. Raise contain
    blood case hold send sense off.
