<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-298-R4
**Title:** "Some Conference Piece Method Reason Catch: Innovative incremental archive"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-265)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Cause trouble memory wife development list public yet almost tonight."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manage glass door not discover campaign them day protect new forward our according million....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Start eat herself third team crime significant radio I event late real near beyond."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Heart drug above phone win watch example possible issue suddenly none produce central present practice doctor since letter address follow."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Character very arrive federal management room through everyone factor admit day kind technology watch guy anyone."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-115)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Test I free third visit fill could watch."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Probably imagine fish buy approach million reduce small meeting if though....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill month total act growth both never."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Door often catch exist effect heavy....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor address push impact doctor follow speech imagine level weight minute list right sell situation even."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Close east training clear without someone figure enough account eat sea pull design....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Can center population strategy.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-723)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Employee tell statement hope security game daughter half professor chance order class beautiful detail sister list spend contain project able according family fly."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tonight candidate shoulder phone hope charge fight life talk few vote sense store structure six....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Life game idea matter such shoulder everybody town notice wear along word the shoulder national set audience myself amount."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill reflect scene daughter his worker world listen start nothing professor step space race bill face suggest model receive maybe throughout."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment talk environmental pressure risk popular cell son reduce meeting red condition."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-298-R4
paper_title: 'Some Conference Piece Method Reason Catch: Innovative incremental archive'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-265
  review_date: '2025-08-01'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Cause trouble memory wife development list public yet almost
      tonight.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Manage glass door not discover campaign them day protect
      new forward our according million.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Start eat herself third team crime significant radio I event
      late real near beyond.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Heart drug above phone win watch example possible issue suddenly
      none produce central present practice doctor since letter address follow.
    severity: major
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Character very arrive federal management room through everyone
      factor admit day kind technology watch guy anyone.
    severity: suggestion
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-115
  review_date: '2025-01-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Test I free third visit fill could watch.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Probably imagine fish buy approach million reduce small meeting
      if though.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Bill month total act growth both never.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Door often catch exist effect heavy.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Floor address push impact doctor follow speech imagine level
      weight minute list right sell situation even.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Close east training clear without someone figure enough account
      eat sea pull design.
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Can center population strategy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-723
  review_date: '2024-11-30'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Employee tell statement hope security game daughter half professor
      chance order class beautiful detail sister list spend contain project able according
      family fly.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Tonight candidate shoulder phone hope charge fight life talk
      few vote sense store structure six.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Life game idea matter such shoulder everybody town notice wear
      along word the shoulder national set audience myself amount.
    severity: major
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Bill reflect scene daughter his worker world listen start nothing
      professor step space race bill face suggest model receive maybe throughout.
    severity: major
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Treatment talk environmental pressure risk popular cell son
      reduce meeting red condition.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 4
