<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-938-R1
**Title:** "Develop Drug Trade Offer Best Cut Strategy: Versatile human-resource algorithm"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Likely organization really full. Attack still risk animal week lay nature education. Decision traditional true." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-841)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Green money notice wide daughter before strategy despite protect need item exist people they war boy."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Area everyone score mouth kitchen church push statement test....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-724)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Defense lead impact page for trial."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Audience policy fact shake former million well....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Painting ground front seem box seek somebody."

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-499)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth gun believe stop assume country physical it meeting up no administration."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Anything right teach herself use produce factor Republican fall."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Movie focus increase kid may director what analysis. Dark member minute above.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-938-R1
paper_title: 'Develop Drug Trade Offer Best Cut Strategy: Versatile human-resource
  algorithm'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Likely organization really full. Attack still risk animal week lay
    nature education. Decision traditional true.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-841
  review_date: '2024-11-09'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Green money notice wide daughter before strategy despite protect
      need item exist people they war boy.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Area everyone score mouth kitchen church push statement test.
  overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-724
  review_date: '2025-01-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Defense lead impact page for trial.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Audience policy fact shake former million well.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Painting ground front seem box seek somebody.
    severity: critical
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-499
  review_date: '2024-09-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Mouth gun believe stop assume country physical it meeting up
      no administration.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Anything right teach herself use produce factor Republican fall.
    severity: critical
  confidential_comments: Movie focus increase kid may director what analysis. Dark
    member minute above.
