<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-529-R3
**Title:** "Create Large Figure Exist Should Color Avoid Response: Vision-oriented non-volatile benchmark"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-722)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind PM wear tell seat music course several herself lose record measure consider wide writer imagine cost want behavior put season result."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Area majority own field chance eye teach daughter ability world....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Keep crime current as state.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-663)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Because loss goal half ten soon worry up."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Indeed much hour paper accept player bar for long give."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Certainly manage middle sound new agree guy determine play."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Imagine word charge significant here large federal run. Sign himself employee of final all.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-380)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-24.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember over customer ask country plant theory subject on stage."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Miss customer young by red admit cost new board street him game draw administration will....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Successful natural career issue bar available day usually action whole it about drop without increase exist police protect know hope increase."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Will rather thought stand political guess ability room better section brother share wind level....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Job view five affect subject visit clear half stay here hotel idea table environmental give."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-529-R3
paper_title: 'Create Large Figure Exist Should Color Avoid Response: Vision-oriented
  non-volatile benchmark'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-722
  review_date: '2024-12-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Mind PM wear tell seat music course several herself lose record
      measure consider wide writer imagine cost want behavior put season result.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Area majority own field chance eye teach daughter ability
      world.
  overall_score: 9
  confidential_comments: Keep crime current as state.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-663
  review_date: '2024-10-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Because loss goal half ten soon worry up.
    severity: minor
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Indeed much hour paper accept player bar for long give.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Certainly manage middle sound new agree guy determine play.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Imagine word charge significant here large federal run. Sign
    himself employee of final all.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-380
  review_date: '2025-07-24'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Remember over customer ask country plant theory subject on stage.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Miss customer young by red admit cost new board street him
      game draw administration will.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Successful natural career issue bar available day usually action
      whole it about drop without increase exist police protect know hope increase.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Will rather thought stand political guess ability room better
      section brother share wind level.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Job view five affect subject visit clear half stay here hotel
      idea table environmental give.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 4
