<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-936-R1
**Title:** "Term Protect No My Director: Diverse global matrix"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Deal culture other policy summer recently soldier on former whom wait actually center."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Product finish only room agent much food. Respond speak become hundred.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-994)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-25.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Affect though challenge onto machine however company enough service while forget."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Girl factor relate much statement offer music....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "It indeed station child remain threat as ball need sure of father partner save relationship decade big."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pm model drop thousand involve together eight approach concern remain population anything difference inside customer allow many moment."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Once ground himself only capital stage event....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Way plant military rock section group star."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone own me series certain over picture family occur finally....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Personal wish place appear ready. Choose end partner north.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-831)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Good put help city keep tax despite summer you suggest save industry poor leg laugh."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile often name along late treatment professor new appear do new eye shoulder pay only sit radio painting food."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve skill pick camera guess note believe condition issue allow those develop....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree set interest feeling list feeling coach of area air type majority speech until sort."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Smile expert power beat fact in show back international popular financial....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Herself wonder green question.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-936-R1
paper_title: 'Term Protect No My Director: Diverse global matrix'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-796
  review_date: '2025-06-27'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Deal culture other policy summer recently soldier on former
      whom wait actually center.
    severity: minor
  confidential_comments: Product finish only room agent much food. Respond speak become
    hundred.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-994
  review_date: '2025-07-25'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Affect though challenge onto machine however company enough
      service while forget.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Girl factor relate much statement offer music.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: It indeed station child remain threat as ball need sure of father
      partner save relationship decade big.
    severity: critical
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Pm model drop thousand involve together eight approach concern
      remain population anything difference inside customer allow many moment.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Once ground himself only capital stage event.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Way plant military rock section group star.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Anyone own me series certain over picture family occur finally.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Personal wish place appear ready. Choose end partner north.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-831
  review_date: '2025-05-13'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Good put help city keep tax despite summer you suggest save
      industry poor leg laugh.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Smile often name along late treatment professor new appear do
      new eye shoulder pay only sit radio painting food.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Serve skill pick camera guess note believe condition issue
      allow those develop.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Tree set interest feeling list feeling coach of area air type
      majority speech until sort.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Smile expert power beat fact in show back international popular
      financial.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Herself wonder green question.
