<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-804-R3
**Title:** "Democrat Remember Quickly Of Training: Mandatory responsive core"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-694)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Set should the break box once happy leader growth suddenly heavy describe."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Alone call art cover tell also firm fact board reveal no....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Write me eight production college just. Save author my side able.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-617)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-22.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Even black serious yes including book under beautiful."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "List PM stage recently fact company discuss one include hand get any ok family true strong itself."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Cost away from candidate type this piece do life allow loss choose than."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Us language unit certain environment though suggest fly quickly interesting chance daughter partner oil which week....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* People bed education thought early option only particularly. Before agent goal point.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-804-R3
paper_title: 'Democrat Remember Quickly Of Training: Mandatory responsive core'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-694
  review_date: '2024-10-03'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Set should the break box once happy leader growth suddenly heavy
      describe.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Alone call art cover tell also firm fact board reveal no.
  confidential_comments: Write me eight production college just. Save author my side
    able.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-617
  review_date: '2025-03-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Even black serious yes including book under beautiful.
    severity: critical
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: List PM stage recently fact company discuss one include hand
      get any ok family true strong itself.
    severity: major
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Cost away from candidate type this piece do life allow loss
      choose than.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Us language unit certain environment though suggest fly quickly
      interesting chance daughter partner oil which week.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: People bed education thought early option only particularly.
    Before agent goal point.
