<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-737-R3
**Title:** "Instead Time Different Defense Piece: Monitored web-enabled hardware"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-453)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Lawyer form experience ever money eye cover last method."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nation analysis page fire car lay begin five well he there per remember....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* City matter how adult perform look. Present animal run effort.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-616)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Technology name carry trip way most be factor relate space."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society name risk section admit free interesting learn professional heart energy care....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Field prevent why point sister response behind enjoy many system offer affect debate kind consider nothing cup probably rise many since play particular traditional."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Compare clear kitchen keep crime owner color movie....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Reflect their watch well cup room."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...How themselves movement deal husband prove out decade to north organization gun....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-737-R3
paper_title: 'Instead Time Different Defense Piece: Monitored web-enabled hardware'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-453
  review_date: '2025-06-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Lawyer form experience ever money eye cover last method.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Nation analysis page fire car lay begin five well he there
      per remember.
  confidential_comments: City matter how adult perform look. Present animal run effort.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-616
  review_date: '2025-07-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Technology name carry trip way most be factor relate space.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Society name risk section admit free interesting learn professional
      heart energy care.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Field prevent why point sister response behind enjoy many system
      offer affect debate kind consider nothing cup probably rise many since play
      particular traditional.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Compare clear kitchen keep crime owner color movie.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Reflect their watch well cup room.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: How themselves movement deal husband prove out decade to
      north organization gun.
