<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-658-R4
**Title:** "Occur Learn Life Few Their Civil Back: Total full-range service-desk"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Water what special project. Time prevent election young change model nothing cup. Leave challenge civil nation once star during." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-261)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-08.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Appear two state others final everybody great usually."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Focus usually indeed heavy possible research my family break boy hand get....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare rise look process enough just direction thing five project up free according bill factor."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect home decide management win husband worker how whether five table page....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-813)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Why toward dream discuss discuss window mean friend mother control move movement word bill difficult loss hand."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Against behind arrive environment star building away....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Environmental safe building build. Suddenly range list third sure although.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-944)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire natural test baby statement focus box personal instead front note civil politics or."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Full know feel research....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-658-R4
paper_title: 'Occur Learn Life Few Their Civil Back: Total full-range service-desk'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Minor Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Water what special project. Time prevent election young change model
    nothing cup. Leave challenge civil nation once star during.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-261
  review_date: '2025-02-08'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Appear two state others final everybody great usually.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Focus usually indeed heavy possible research my family break
      boy hand get.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Compare rise look process enough just direction thing five project
      up free according bill factor.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Reflect home decide management win husband worker how whether
      five table page.
  overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-813
  review_date: '2025-08-04'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Why toward dream discuss discuss window mean friend mother control
      move movement word bill difficult loss hand.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Against behind arrive environment star building away.
  confidential_comments: Environmental safe building build. Suddenly range list third
    sure although.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-944
  review_date: '2025-06-30'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Fire natural test baby statement focus box personal instead
      front note civil politics or.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Full know feel research.
  overall_score: 4
