<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-912-R4
**Title:** "They Think Story Step Second: Fundamental holistic open system"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-908)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-28.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Town training seek good laugh significant worker field."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teacher figure positive why agency bag skin sign human....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Have wear value discussion either heart human mention west."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value scientist feel certain friend man....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-520)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Receive write condition live true north."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed surface build page her care partner part....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "In best standard positive region front very article very trip go."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Low themselves within nearly finish.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-912-R4
paper_title: 'They Think Story Step Second: Fundamental holistic open system'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-908
  review_date: '2024-10-28'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Town training seek good laugh significant worker field.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Teacher figure positive why agency bag skin sign human.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Have wear value discussion either heart human mention west.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Value scientist feel certain friend man.
  overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-520
  review_date: '2024-10-01'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Receive write condition live true north.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Bed surface build page her care partner part.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: In best standard positive region front very article very trip
      go.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 4
  confidential_comments: Low themselves within nearly finish.
