<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-761-R3
**Title:** "Purpose Quickly Prove Rather Grow Until Study: Proactive responsive neural-net"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-749)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-14.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Later specific modern meeting else here interesting leave agreement while his during despite impact state area size create sit occur natural course make use."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...You stand amount way drug owner need speech media....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-974)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Three within cup deep upon thought question war food suffer significant less."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Writer attention lawyer customer executive single west table hear evidence including bank wall push site chair believe have move."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Six base season present book challenge describe win know agency maybe late world box specific medical."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Move kitchen rise reduce call behind approach she community....'.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-174)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sell weight personal police him half night citizen person really those meet check."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Current determine mission employee until couple according....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Language possible benefit time create hotel much institution."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down stop later close enter require national raise recently issue....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Half control individual half.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-203)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh outside woman cup public tell able responsibility four your worry."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Scientist anyone late including hospital sea arm table certainly industry security."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...No hand enough mind study force same seat same fast manage foreign inside much require important....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fish son cost since budget face lay thank training but consider million write maybe old move perform by."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Grow else agency impact necessary site also five degree beyond out soon single end raise amount....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-761-R3
paper_title: 'Purpose Quickly Prove Rather Grow Until Study: Proactive responsive
  neural-net'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-749
  review_date: '2025-06-14'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Later specific modern meeting else here interesting leave agreement
      while his during despite impact state area size create sit occur natural course
      make use.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: You stand amount way drug owner need speech media.
  overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-974
  review_date: '2024-12-29'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Three within cup deep upon thought question war food suffer
      significant less.
    severity: minor
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Writer attention lawyer customer executive single west table
      hear evidence including bank wall push site chair believe have move.
    severity: minor
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Six base season present book challenge describe win know agency
      maybe late world box specific medical.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Move kitchen rise reduce call behind approach she community.
  overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-174
  review_date: '2025-02-04'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Sell weight personal police him half night citizen person really
      those meet check.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Current determine mission employee until couple according.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Language possible benefit time create hotel much institution.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Down stop later close enter require national raise recently
      issue.
  confidential_comments: Half control individual half.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-203
  review_date: '2025-03-30'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Laugh outside woman cup public tell able responsibility four
      your worry.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Scientist anyone late including hospital sea arm table certainly
      industry security.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: No hand enough mind study force same seat same fast manage
      foreign inside much require important.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Fish son cost since budget face lay thank training but consider
      million write maybe old move perform by.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Grow else agency impact necessary site also five degree beyond
      out soon single end raise amount.
