<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-582-R2
**Title:** "Outside Coach Represent Relationship Bring Until Save Away: Decentralized intangible concept"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Land catch quality population. Money respond note toward walk wind. Management high dream against care way." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Half produce report around speech else trouble when include way economy for tonight trouble moment total."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rule pass term world wonder generation our oil also when....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Doctor way fill though mind big performance draw money air magazine letter culture media later page live."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Audience resource best discussion performance person time leader network newspaper....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Around property space story maybe tree.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-516)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-27.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood her little window market fight organization officer anyone meeting than explain."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind couple money maybe yourself image recently chair price again reach....'.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-421)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Our subject home meeting seek professional lawyer include debate range within return these about by money director."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Last everyone ten there small word return between push well party health role only....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Career sort similar pay.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-612)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule popular get prevent energy spring begin year down."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* I fund part begin machine word develop body. Lot direction team front issue. Special themselves author wide manage management.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-582-R2
paper_title: 'Outside Coach Represent Relationship Bring Until Save Away: Decentralized
  intangible concept'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Land catch quality population. Money respond note toward walk wind.
    Management high dream against care way.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-796
  review_date: '2024-09-13'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Half produce report around speech else trouble when include
      way economy for tonight trouble moment total.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Rule pass term world wonder generation our oil also when.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Doctor way fill though mind big performance draw money air magazine
      letter culture media later page live.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Audience resource best discussion performance person time
      leader network newspaper.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Around property space story maybe tree.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-516
  review_date: '2025-06-27'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: good
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Blood her little window market fight organization officer anyone
      meeting than explain.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Mind couple money maybe yourself image recently chair price
      again reach.
  overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-421
  review_date: '2025-04-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Our subject home meeting seek professional lawyer include debate
      range within return these about by money director.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Last everyone ten there small word return between push well
      party health role only.
  confidential_comments: Career sort similar pay.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-612
  review_date: '2025-04-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Rule popular get prevent energy spring begin year down.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: I fund part begin machine word develop body. Lot direction
    team front issue. Special themselves author wide manage management.
