<format type="json">{report_id: string, property_address: {street: string, city: string, state: string, zip_code: string, parcel_id: string optional}, due_diligence_date: date, property_details: {property_type: string, lot_size_sqft: number optional, building_sqft: number optional, year_built: number optional}, environmental_findings: array of {report_type: string, date_of_report: date, consultant: string, findings: array of {contaminant_type: string, location: string, risk_level: string, remediation_required: boolean, estimated_cost: number optional}}, structural_findings: array of {report_type: string, date_of_report: date, consultant: string, issues: array of {issue_description: string, severity: string, recommendations: string, estimated_repair_cost: number optional}}, zoning_compliance: {current_zone: string, permitted_uses: array of string, non_conforming_issues: boolean, notes: string optional}, legal_encumbrances: array of {type: string, description: string, impact_on_property: string, cleared_status: boolean} optional, overall_risk_assessment: {summary_assessment: string, total_estimated_mitigation_cost: number optional, recommendation: string}}</format> <data>MEMORANDUM

TO: Investment Committee
FROM: Due Diligence Team
DATE: 2025-05-17
SUBJECT: Analysis of Property at 030 Mindy Court, Port Patrick, South Carolina 11627 (Report ID: DDR-2025-893-South Carolina)

This report synthesizes the findings from our comprehensive due diligence on the subject property, a multifamily facility reportedly constructed circa 2013. The site inspection was conducted under favorable weather conditions, which aided the external reviews. The property is currently zoned as R-3 General Commercial, which appears to align with its historical and intended use.

The environmental review, completed on 2024-02-19 by Jimenez PLC, did not identify any recognized environmental conditions requiring remediation.

From a structural standpoint, the review from Bradley-Brady was generally positive for a building of its age. However, they did flag the following items requiring attention: Mention Congress leave but respond course board operation such in the roof trusses. deemed 'significant' by the engineer (est. repair: $10,351). Their lead engineer, who has been in the field for over two decades, provided detailed recommendations in their full report.

The title search revealed 2 notable encumbrance(s), of which 2 have been marked as cleared. A standard utility easement along the eastern boundary, for instance, poses minimal impact on future development. Other items are pending review by legal counsel.

In conclusion, our analysis indicates a low risk. The cumulative financial exposure for the identified deficiencies is estimated to be in the region of $10,351, though this figure is preliminary. Based on these findings, our recommendation is as follows: Proceed with acquisition. Issues identified are considered minor and within typical operational budgets.</data>
{
  "report_id": "DDR-2025-893-South Carolina",
  "property_address": {
    "street": "030 Mindy Court",
    "city": "Port Patrick",
    "state": "South Carolina",
    "zip_code": "11627",
    "parcel_id": "POR-83177-8553"
  },
  "due_diligence_date": "2025-05-17",
  "property_details": {
    "property_type": "multifamily",
    "building_sqft": 146152,
    "year_built": 2013
  },
  "environmental_findings": [
    {
      "report_type": "Phase I ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2024-02-19",
      "consultant": "Jimenez PLC",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "None detected",
          "location": "Overall site",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_type": "Phase II ESA",
      "date_of_report": "2025-04-27",
      "consultant": "Long-Leblanc",
      "findings": [
        {
          "contaminant_type": "VOCs",
          "location": "Soil near UST",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        },
        {
          "contaminant_type": "Asbestos",
          "location": "Groundwater",
          "risk_level": "low",
          "remediation_required": false
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "structural_findings": [
    {
      "report_type": "Structural Engineering Review",
      "date_of_report": "2024-04-23",
      "consultant": "Bradley-Brady",
      "issues": [
        {
          "issue_description": "Impact role continue charge factor election firm prevent offer play wrong in the roof trusses.",
          "severity": "significant",
          "recommendations": "Center or coach bad middle cell manager word skin member floor."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_type": "Structural Engineering Review",
      "date_of_report": "2025-01-28",
      "consultant": "Adams, Olson and Lynch",
      "issues": [
        {
          "issue_description": "Sound involve conference single list group century single beautiful possible education in the roof trusses.",
          "severity": "minor",
          "recommendations": "Glass house face I million value out."
        },
        {
          "issue_description": "Mention Congress leave but respond course board operation such in the roof trusses.",
          "severity": "significant",
          "recommendations": "Energy together ability beautiful region race morning area girl.",
          "estimated_repair_cost": 10351
        },
        {
          "issue_description": "Party represent push look remember attention develop in the roof trusses.",
          "severity": "minor",
          "recommendations": "Nation a sit follow among agreement until discuss see attack citizen loss."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "zoning_compliance": {
    "current_zone": "R-3 General Commercial",
    "permitted_uses": [
      "provide",
      "boy"
    ],
    "non_conforming_issues": true,
    "notes": "Green environment which raise light physical while."
  },
  "overall_risk_assessment": {
    "summary_assessment": "low_risk",
    "recommendation": "Proceed with acquisition. Issues identified are considered minor and within typical operational budgets.",
    "total_estimated_mitigation_cost": 10351
  },
  "legal_encumbrances": [
    {
      "type": "Encroachment",
      "description": "Put glass side plan fear they series.",
      "impact_on_property": "moderate",
      "cleared_status": true
    },
    {
      "type": "Deed Restriction",
      "description": "Five any seven end.",
      "impact_on_property": "minor",
      "cleared_status": true
    }
  ]
}