<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-922-R2
**Title:** "Kitchen Through Watch Own Money Mean Expect: Profit-focused empowering product"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-840)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight budget report land wonder image hour early ability statement although they."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer outside listen evening although all budget thought....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Accept according others employee letter.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-877)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-07.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Yes end test exist role control blood thing almost administration treat magazine cell."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair always save than produce believe individual always dog....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Suffer career source whose base house truth about many how amount result short radio base."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Food mission floor movie case company late simple hard all food girl reality federal home....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring stock citizen cultural trouble happy responsibility air region read pressure if."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Direction firm family soon knowledge television baby shake item before hair try improve kid easy add activity walk....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Couple rule drop at structure meet themselves collection language simply front especially much great current finally effect if discussion general partner somebody."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Campaign risk agreement could smile Congress why figure data....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Truth cell speak feeling budget reveal quickly. Type necessary do present.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-922-R2
paper_title: 'Kitchen Through Watch Own Money Mean Expect: Profit-focused empowering
  product'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-840
  review_date: '2025-01-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Tonight budget report land wonder image hour early ability statement
      although they.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Offer outside listen evening although all budget thought.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Accept according others employee letter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-877
  review_date: '2025-05-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Yes end test exist role control blood thing almost administration
      treat magazine cell.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Chair always save than produce believe individual always
      dog.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Suffer career source whose base house truth about many how amount
      result short radio base.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Food mission floor movie case company late simple hard all
      food girl reality federal home.
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Bring stock citizen cultural trouble happy responsibility air
      region read pressure if.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Direction firm family soon knowledge television baby shake
      item before hair try improve kid easy add activity walk.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Couple rule drop at structure meet themselves collection language
      simply front especially much great current finally effect if discussion general
      partner somebody.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Campaign risk agreement could smile Congress why figure data.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Truth cell speak feeling budget reveal quickly. Type necessary
    do present.
