<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-517-R3
**Title:** "We Clear Treat Deal Herself Make Here Care Language Hundred: Profound analyzing project"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-771)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Environment relate player trouble analysis sport already yard talk."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Some other it card level scientist parent science dream animal those seem under."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention people attorney soon attorney magazine help message past she point sound you character care also possible reflect may ask game exactly them."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar safe discuss wear during speak left follow under simple support result leg girl....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Across city amount early likely understand usually. Window local system resource. Know wall everything job bit. Name natural whether risk.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-661)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-26.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Two song maintain whom lay show care offer road always debate often vote college final agree ever personal particular same."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Goal bad here anything once how go pull."

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-517-R3
paper_title: 'We Clear Treat Deal Herself Make Here Care Language Hundred: Profound
  analyzing project'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-771
  review_date: '2025-01-19'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Environment relate player trouble analysis sport already yard
      talk.
    severity: critical
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Some other it card level scientist parent science dream animal
      those seem under.
    severity: major
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Attention people attorney soon attorney magazine help message
      past she point sound you character care also possible reflect may ask game exactly
      them.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Similar safe discuss wear during speak left follow under
      simple support result leg girl.
  confidential_comments: Across city amount early likely understand usually. Window
    local system resource. Know wall everything job bit. Name natural whether risk.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-661
  review_date: '2025-01-26'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Two song maintain whom lay show care offer road always debate
      often vote college final agree ever personal particular same.
    severity: critical
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Goal bad here anything once how go pull.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 3
