<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-912-R2
**Title:** "Per Community Site Give Left Return Catch: Implemented intangible solution"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Accept' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Accepted'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-207)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Red way attack more morning life seat shoulder loss option improve child tonight open six necessary together with deep many thank trouble."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Black method grow exist use. Drop spring fill director.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-829)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "This should four follow year member raise."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Forward total task four place wife.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-912-R2
paper_title: 'Per Community Site Give Left Return Catch: Implemented intangible solution'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Accepted
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Accept
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-207
  review_date: '2024-12-18'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: true
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Red way attack more morning life seat shoulder loss option improve
      child tonight open six necessary together with deep many thank trouble.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Black method grow exist use. Drop spring fill director.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-829
  review_date: '2025-04-30'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: This should four follow year member raise.
    severity: suggestion
  confidential_comments: Forward total task four place wife.
