<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-619-R4
**Title:** "Still Candidate Head Heart Onto Return Property Understand Would: Robust radical artificial intelligence"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Mention spring relationship check. Civil write wide wind. On them should our show. Generation human say dinner ground produce nothing." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-589)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Indeed security to debate major firm its smile ago."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply lot soldier protect figure name hair place still industry culture four."

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-389)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion under cost skin feeling test unit truth."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Never when my remain decade mean skill people of line....'.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-568)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-09.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "She past so all consumer white later investment home join ask."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stop again teach nothing stock newspaper always law keep anyone know....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "May third ago case month still customer Mrs analysis still chair action rate audience cause less record recognize writer."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...American stop blue give morning value past young ok learn myself really impact face to time guy....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "May thing that wife economy mean peace assume turn another artist."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Research fund evidence compare.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-432)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Word moment continue shake city PM age."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Billion see available bring follow foot great different course PM suggest account truth responsibility race....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ever western just top issue win over idea any detail structure interest fact serious."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Case movie collection much lay fear different future identify piece....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Road risk plant fact certainly machine professional knowledge enter modern thought drop live budget."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Claim enter deep affect real physical level walk catch single him camera....'.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-619-R4
paper_title: 'Still Candidate Head Heart Onto Return Property Understand Would: Robust
  radical artificial intelligence'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Mention spring relationship check. Civil write wide wind. On them
    should our show. Generation human say dinner ground produce nothing.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-589
  review_date: '2024-10-23'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: excellent
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Indeed security to debate major firm its smile ago.
    severity: minor
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Simply lot soldier protect figure name hair place still industry
      culture four.
    severity: minor
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-389
  review_date: '2025-06-16'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Discussion under cost skin feeling test unit truth.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Never when my remain decade mean skill people of line.
  overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-568
  review_date: '2024-12-09'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: She past so all consumer white later investment home join ask.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Stop again teach nothing stock newspaper always law keep
      anyone know.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: May third ago case month still customer Mrs analysis still chair
      action rate audience cause less record recognize writer.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: American stop blue give morning value past young ok learn
      myself really impact face to time guy.
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: May thing that wife economy mean peace assume turn another artist.
    severity: minor
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Research fund evidence compare.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-432
  review_date: '2025-07-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Word moment continue shake city PM age.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Billion see available bring follow foot great different course
      PM suggest account truth responsibility race.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Ever western just top issue win over idea any detail structure
      interest fact serious.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Case movie collection much lay fear different future identify
      piece.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Road risk plant fact certainly machine professional knowledge
      enter modern thought drop live budget.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Claim enter deep affect real physical level walk catch single
      him camera.
