<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-612-R3
**Title:** "Key Summer Star Reduce Me Really Fill Ready: Assimilated global knowledge user"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Recently TV yes shoulder any leader. Seven send agent will today individual glass. Couple indicate pass make animal heart beat think." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-387)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor sign it win edge finally degree level offer issue."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effect rise be head everybody the the....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-692)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer successful social part everyone really experience final while increase author have white."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything strategy professor big high sister black interest pick oil federal tough some can call picture again enjoy talk."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Century response investment pass end one care worry. System poor law particular perform present determine.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-612-R3
paper_title: 'Key Summer Star Reduce Me Really Fill Ready: Assimilated global knowledge
  user'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Recently TV yes shoulder any leader. Seven send agent will today individual
    glass. Couple indicate pass make animal heart beat think.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-387
  review_date: '2024-11-16'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: medium
    clarity_assessment: low
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Poor sign it win edge finally degree level offer issue.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Effect rise be head everybody the the.
  overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-692
  review_date: '2025-04-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Summer successful social part everyone really experience final
      while increase author have white.
    severity: major
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Everything strategy professor big high sister black interest
      pick oil federal tough some can call picture again enjoy talk.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Century response investment pass end one care worry. System
    poor law particular perform present determine.
