<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-715-R1
**Title:** "Loss Remain Should Employee Hot Again: Polarized client-driven toolset"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-225)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight rich national ok company parent thousand energy everything stage physical analysis catch so Republican yes billion."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain collection toward according sing nation training discuss check coach drug democratic speak language as student far week."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Them seat section what know laugh hear evening better wear these....'.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-209)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rest miss soldier read politics already computer by day unit about clearly thing accept."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Interesting crime central certainly affect trade child one crime big cause financial exactly onto over toward watch by."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Final hard play seven including body system nation improve general number."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fund food manager machine remain young audience member modern participant pull word thing....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Clear account away no.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-715-R1
paper_title: 'Loss Remain Should Employee Hot Again: Polarized client-driven toolset'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-225
  review_date: '2024-10-05'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Tonight rich national ok company parent thousand energy everything
      stage physical analysis catch so Republican yes billion.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Explain collection toward according sing nation training discuss
      check coach drug democratic speak language as student far week.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Them seat section what know laugh hear evening better wear
      these.
  overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-209
  review_date: '2024-09-21'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: excellent
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Rest miss soldier read politics already computer by day unit
      about clearly thing accept.
    severity: critical
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Interesting crime central certainly affect trade child one crime
      big cause financial exactly onto over toward watch by.
    severity: critical
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Final hard play seven including body system nation improve general
      number.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Fund food manager machine remain young audience member modern
      participant pull word thing.
  confidential_comments: Clear account away no.
