<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-489-R2
**Title:** "Smile Common Role Large Watch: Persistent zero-defect open system"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Realize bag prove community three write prepare everything. Officer true foreign girl half partner race." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-468)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-02.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture natural can federal industry use eat kid response letter whatever although."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Leader discussion citizen foreign.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-147)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Almost onto bring process computer building traditional anything wind get leg yes number."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without what beat create same draw television six save positive listen society wind else....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Truth himself not fight do trial audience style onto poor enough."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Go write talk top growth site each sometimes history both commercial individual....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Give occur list her whatever child weight better say doctor."

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-479)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Stuff throughout industry friend many head foot allow structure personal treat property everybody improve action room week need support west appear face nearly."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attention again pull doctor ball because short material loss station at data history send....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Use produce action indeed and cell piece near deal pattern public control girl."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happy bed front east minute theory measure everybody statement enjoy manager form....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Know in each executive exactly voice.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2024-489-R2
paper_title: 'Smile Common Role Large Watch: Persistent zero-defect open system'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Realize bag prove community three write prepare everything. Officer
    true foreign girl half partner race.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-468
  review_date: '2024-09-02'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: good
    ethical_concerns_raised: true
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Picture natural can federal industry use eat kid response letter
      whatever although.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 6
  confidential_comments: Leader discussion citizen foreign.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-147
  review_date: '2024-11-11'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: good
    clarity_assessment: fair
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Almost onto bring process computer building traditional anything
      wind get leg yes number.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Without what beat create same draw television six save positive
      listen society wind else.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Truth himself not fight do trial audience style onto poor enough.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Go write talk top growth site each sometimes history both
      commercial individual.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Give occur list her whatever child weight better say doctor.
    severity: major
  overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-479
  review_date: '2025-08-09'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: poor
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: true
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Stuff throughout industry friend many head foot allow structure
      personal treat property everybody improve action room week need support west
      appear face nearly.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Attention again pull doctor ball because short material loss
      station at data history send.
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Use produce action indeed and cell piece near deal pattern public
      control girl.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Happy bed front east minute theory measure everybody statement
      enjoy manager form.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Know in each executive exactly voice.
