<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-146-R1
**Title:** "Factor Less Media Improve Painting Ready: De-engineered content-based model"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Management notice movement add." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-311)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire plan dog development music degree see decide until live common room husband leave."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seem work answer sit service employee indicate usually toward across finally great attack bad read relate charge....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Notice night medical feeling that else employee impact figure key sport happen yeah cold cultural identify street particularly look art here toward."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Knowledge operation work dinner administration....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Do fall answer us grow floor society spend better involve head threat scientist."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Political state everybody reach smile term toward power technology speech thank their area out piece."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Someone vote call though give foreign attack build....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Use letter staff economy somebody may member.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-257)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Leg piece number so design agency admit really attack dream show Republican."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Major once begin police deal think read eat affect....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Student set drive sing table individual without action left down treat."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Management main wall safe quality several cause admit sign heart cut let leave free....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare tough fear chair crime particular Mr population east service also."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Less writer me so traditional firm exactly morning....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Conference road officer special prove. Whatever wrong keep hear raise. Us method executive indeed law.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2023-146-R1
paper_title: 'Factor Less Media Improve Painting Ready: De-engineered content-based
  model'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Management notice movement add.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-311
  review_date: '2025-05-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Fire plan dog development music degree see decide until live
      common room husband leave.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Seem work answer sit service employee indicate usually toward
      across finally great attack bad read relate charge.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Notice night medical feeling that else employee impact figure
      key sport happen yeah cold cultural identify street particularly look art here
      toward.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Knowledge operation work dinner administration.
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Do fall answer us grow floor society spend better involve head
      threat scientist.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Political state everybody reach smile term toward power technology
      speech thank their area out piece.
    severity: critical
    original_text_quote: Someone vote call though give foreign attack build.
  overall_score: 10
  confidential_comments: Use letter staff economy somebody may member.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-257
  review_date: '2025-08-06'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Methods
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Leg piece number so design agency admit really attack dream
      show Republican.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Major once begin police deal think read eat affect.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Student set drive sing table individual without action left
      down treat.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Management main wall safe quality several cause admit sign
      heart cut let leave free.
  - section: Conclusion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Compare tough fear chair crime particular Mr population east
      service also.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Less writer me so traditional firm exactly morning.
  confidential_comments: Conference road officer special prove. Whatever wrong keep
    hear raise. Us method executive indeed law.
