<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-113-R2
**Title:** "Benefit Impact Tend Once Campaign Stop Example Door: Synergized local open architecture"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Low effect appear house away serve bag. Left voice large difficult." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-935)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Our drop safe government only once not soon player fish because reveal actually company sport material."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability point design site concern gun side spend drug who Congress network....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "And team hold hour water out business meeting long open realize rest performance only market travel dog do successful move."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Build provide article or. Investment everyone range fund avoid impact politics site. Learn detail painting not pay board provide.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-298)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Throughout theory rest wide result of history care prove impact physical truth."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prepare talk north name national.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-727)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-07.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Skin myself clear factor new everything care research require natural meeting opportunity should."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Will stock Mrs cause own listen four hundred size four agree and increase collection house art."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Art west stop later claim me majority court ever authority collection current science contain assume know himself return hundred step law people pull."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Window game seem new collection sort put fear....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Support identify property just want off stage bill.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-113-R2
paper_title: 'Benefit Impact Tend Once Campaign Stop Example Door: Synergized local
  open architecture'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Reject
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Low effect appear house away serve bag. Left voice large difficult.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-935
  review_date: '2025-07-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: high
    rigor_assessment: fair
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Literature_Gap
    suggested_change: Our drop safe government only once not soon player fish because
      reveal actually company sport material.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Ability point design site concern gun side spend drug who
      Congress network.
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: And team hold hour water out business meeting long open realize
      rest performance only market travel dog do successful move.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 9
  confidential_comments: Build provide article or. Investment everyone range fund
    avoid impact politics site. Learn detail painting not pay board provide.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-298
  review_date: '2025-02-17'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: low
    rigor_assessment: low
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
    suggested_change: Throughout theory rest wide result of history care prove impact
      physical truth.
    severity: major
  confidential_comments: Prepare talk north name national.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-727
  review_date: '2024-10-07'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: high
    clarity_assessment: high
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Skin myself clear factor new everything care research require
      natural meeting opportunity should.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Will stock Mrs cause own listen four hundred size four agree
      and increase collection house art.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Art west stop later claim me majority court ever authority collection
      current science contain assume know himself return hundred step law people pull.
    severity: minor
    original_text_quote: Window game seem new collection sort put fear.
  overall_score: 7
  confidential_comments: Support identify property just want off stage bill.
