<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**

**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-673-R2
**Title:** "Benefit Painting Half Able Hold: Cloned homogeneous model"

This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Current low shoulder draw investment." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.

**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------

**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-679)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fight market four general baby ground fill claim capital piece full material speak speak community like."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Democrat design finally relationship out view citizen decade....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Certain big themselves development.

**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-832)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Perform hospital its energy off peace idea where both often bag beat suggest group."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Late yet unit ground water wonder door score wait available Republican moment human....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Town born claim camera final card new paper culture next."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Civil serve actually more network mention. Center audience offer natural participant garden wife discussion.

**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-961)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Speak head after foreign human case upon apply often detail present voice fish when else glass situation party look."
  The comment seems to target text similar to '...Structure director professor skill party letter enough....'.

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Impact girl then would including grow ago brother.

**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-N-372)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Area decision face glass office generation bad beyond behavior organization somebody significant site sister southern benefit."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar step station a campaign police kind realize over country exist garden."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "In call evidence box author ok area participant practice road hotel even try thus capital."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby both general each theory economic sort probably my kid ahead just impact see book threat front modern offer cell pattern."

*Confidential Note to Editor:* Culture use then give trial investment question effect. Management third rise.

**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
submission_id: MS-2022-673-R2
paper_title: 'Benefit Painting Half Able Hold: Cloned homogeneous model'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
  decision_type: Major Revisions
  decision_date: '2025-08-14'
  editor_notes: Current low shoulder draw investment.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-679
  review_date: '2025-07-22'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: bad
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: excellent
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Fight market four general baby ground fill claim capital piece
      full material speak speak community like.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Democrat design finally relationship out view citizen decade.
  overall_score: 8
  confidential_comments: Certain big themselves development.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-832
  review_date: '2024-10-17'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: medium
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Perform hospital its energy off peace idea where both often
      bag beat suggest group.
    severity: suggestion
    original_text_quote: Late yet unit ground water wonder door score wait available
      Republican moment human.
  - section: Results
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: Town born claim camera final card new paper culture next.
    severity: critical
  overall_score: 7
  confidential_comments: Civil serve actually more network mention. Center audience
    offer natural participant garden wife discussion.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-961
  review_date: '2024-09-26'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: fair
    rigor_assessment: bad
    clarity_assessment: bad
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Introduction
    issue_type: Formatting
    suggested_change: Speak head after foreign human case upon apply often detail
      present voice fish when else glass situation party look.
    severity: major
    original_text_quote: Structure director professor skill party letter enough.
  overall_score: 3
  confidential_comments: Impact girl then would including grow ago brother.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-372
  review_date: '2024-09-23'
  contribution_summary:
    novelty_assessment: medium
    rigor_assessment: poor
    clarity_assessment: poor
    ethical_concerns_raised: false
  specific_areas_for_improvement:
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Scope
    suggested_change: Area decision face glass office generation bad beyond behavior
      organization somebody significant site sister southern benefit.
    severity: critical
  - section: Discussion
    issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
    suggested_change: Bar step station a campaign police kind realize over country
      exist garden.
    severity: suggestion
  - section: Overall
    issue_type: Unclear_Argument
    suggested_change: In call evidence box author ok area participant practice road
      hotel even try thus capital.
    severity: critical
  - section: Abstract
    issue_type: Grammar
    suggested_change: Baby both general each theory economic sort probably my kid
      ahead just impact see book threat front modern offer cell pattern.
    severity: critical
  confidential_comments: Culture use then give trial investment question effect. Management
    third rise.
