 A group of scientists published an article in 2005 in the "Journal of Information Ethics", in which they concluded that most criticism against Lomborg was unjustified, and that the scientific community had misused their authority to suppress the author.The claim that allegations against Lomborg were unsubstantiated was challenged in the next issue of "Journal of Information Ethics" by Kåre Fog, one of the original DCSD petitioners.Fog reasserted his contention that, despite the ministry's decision, most of the accusations against Lomborg were valid, and rejected what he called "the Galileo hypothesis", which portrays Lomborg as a brave young man confronting an entrenched opposition.