 Belief or unbelief in the theory of evolution is no more a characteristic of any religious establishment or mode of worship than is belief or unbelief in the wisdom of the prohibition laws.It would appear that members of the same churches quite generally disagree as to these things.Further, the court held that while the statute "forbade" the teaching of evolution (as the court had defined it) it did not "require" teaching any other doctrine and thus did not benefit any one religious doctrine or sect over others.