 It was "no more nor less than an inaccurate description" (at 91G) of the company, but it was still entirely clear from the surrounding factual circumstances that it was the company who was the other party to the contract.Although "F Goldsmith (Sicklesmere) Ltd v Baxter" is only a first instance decision, it has become a widely used precedent in situations where the name of a company has been misspelled or otherwise misidentified in a contract or other undertaking.It was most recently cited by the English Court of Appeal with approval in .