 Correll's main argument is that the law requiring him to vote for the candidate that receives the move votes in the primary violates his First Amendment right of free speech.Herring, the opposition, said that Correll's argument should be deemed invalid because of prejudice.His evidence for this was that Correll had at least two months to file this lawsuit, but he waited until just before the Republican National Convention to give the case as little time as possible to be fully argued.