 That fact, as well as the Court's statement that AP's news was not indispensable, made the case not a pure essential facilities § 2 case.Instead, it permitted a boycott "per se" legal theory under § 1.In "Lorain Journal Co. v. United States", a newspaper with a dominant position in its local advertising market, adopted a policy of refusing to deal with merchants that also advertised in a radio station attempting to enter the market.