 The Court in "Bush v. Gore" did remand the case instead of dismissing it, but the remand did not include another request for clarification.Louise Weinberg argues that, even giving the Court the benefit of the doubt that it acted appropriately in intervening in Florida state law, its actions should be deemed unconstitutional because its intervention was not coupled with any kind of remedy aimed at determining the actual outcome of the election.Some critics of the decision argue that the majority seemed to seek refuge from their own logic in the following sentence in the majority opinion