 Titu Maiorescu had by then reacted against this approach, accusing his adversaries of enforcing "forms without substance" (that is, ill-adapted to the Romanian realities which they claimed to address), and directed his accusations specifically against the University of Bucharest faculty, exposing the heads of department for lacking training in their fields of choice.Maiorescu replied to his adversaries in "Beţia de cuvinte", where he emphasized his group's overall rejection and occasional derision of traditional Romanian literature, and commented that both the model and its defenders had produced a characteristically prolix style.The "Junimist" figure also focused on discussing errors in Urechia's works, particularly when it came to his pronouncements on the philosophy of history.