 The attempts to rely on this article is another example of the appellants' reversal of the onus of proof of legality, which disregards the effect of sections 20 and 47.I would only say, in the first, place, that article 8 is not part of our law.Secondly, there has been no legislation which, being post-Convention and
ambiguous, falls to be construed so as to conform with the Convention rather than to contradict it.