 This "disability" was sufficiently evident to the bank, as the stronger party, to make their acceptance of the weaker party's assent to the transaction manifestly unfair.The bank did not ensure that the Amadios fully understood the nature of the transaction; therefore the bank’s taking advantage of the opportunity that presented itself was unconscionable.While "Amadio" is the leading authority on unconscionable dealing in Australia, courts have frequently relied upon other cases to help define what constitutes special disability.