 The doctrine of unconscionability is well-established in Canada, where it has branched from the older and more settled doctrine of undue influence, and is generally defined as taking undue advantage of an inequality in bargaining power.In the case of "Harry v. Kreutziger", Harry was a First Nations Aboriginal with a congenital partial hearing defect.A commercial fisherman, he had a grade 5 education and was not widely experienced in business matters.