 B2 has 34% (66%×0 + 34%×1).The nomination of B2 changes the winner from A to B, overturning the landslide, even though the additional information about voters' preferences is redundant due to the similarity of B2 to B.Similar examples can be constructed to show that "given the Borda count, any arbitrarily large landslide can be overturned by adding enough candidates" (assuming at least one voter prefers the landslide loser).