 I assume that the ordinance was constitutional when adopted, and assume for purposes of this case that the original ordinance remains valid today.The city subsequently amended its ordinance to forbid clusters of such businesses at one address, as in a mall.The city has, in turn, taken a third step to apply this amendment to prohibit even a single proprietor from doing business in a traditional way that combines an adult bookstore, selling books, magazines, and videos, with an adult arcade, consisting of open viewing booths, where potential purchasers of videos can view them for a fee.” Souter goes on to argue that businesses at one address are not in violation of the original intent of the law.