 Justice Scalia argued that the Court thought the precedent established in the "Gerstein" case in regards to issues associated with warrantless arrests was more than enough in determining when probable cause is determined for suspects.He also argued that the court disregarded the guarantees the Fourth Amendment outlined in regards to holding people in custody.Finally, Justice Scalia argued that the Court's further interpretation of the "Gerstein" case to mandate that law enforcement must determine probable cause in a set amount of time was unnecessary; he felt that it was completely unrelated to clearing arrest-related administrative affairs or assigning a judge to the suspect's case.