lākanā. A colon-like form of punctuation was also introduced to distinguish between words. Although these developments came rather early and facilitated the recording of gināns, based on manuscript evidence, it can be inferred that the scrip was continuously evolving right up until the late 19th century. However, it was a common practice for old and deteriorating manuscripts to be respectfully destroyed upon being recopied, thus making tracing the evolution of the script across time a challenge. Apart from the unknown number of manuscripts in private collections, there are currently three institutional collections at the ITREB-Pakistan (Ismaili Tariqa and Religious Education Board) in Karachi, at the IIS (Institute of Ismaili Studies) in London, and at Harvard University. In adapting to new printing technologies, the Khojkī script entered a new stage of its development in the early 20th century under the auspice of Lāljī Devrājī, who compiled, edited, and published a range of materials in Khojkī through his Khoja Sindhi Printing Press in Bombay. Despite these efforts to utilize various new printing technologies, Dr. Asani reflects that “ironically, the introduction of printing may have also sounded the deathknell for the script.” Several factors contributed to this decline. During the early 20th century, the “publication of religious literature was centralized and brought under the control of community institutions.” While on the one hand this larger institutional backing aided in more widespread availability and distribution of texts in Khojkī. On the other, “regional variations were a serious problem” because of the “lack of uniformity in the script in different geographical areas.” Additionally, efforts made by the Ismaili Imamate institution to standardize rituals and shift away from the more “Indic” elements that became part of religious, cultural, and linguistic identity of Khoja communities also played a significant role in the shift away from using the Khojkī script. Even though Khojkī is no longer a “living script” access to this corpus can provide unique insights into the ways in which the Ismaili tradition grew and adapted in this specific cultural context, as well as offering insights into how this community envisioned and constructed their own history and identity. Script & Identity As is explained by Michel Boivin, for the contemporary Khoja community, because the gināns are at the core of the Khoja religious heritage, “they quickly became a crucial stake in the process of identity construction." Asani argues that “in the Ismaili case the adoption of