to Congress's 'own Members,'" so Congress must lack "exclusive control to judge the qualifications of nonmembers, including candidates." A contrary holding, he wrote, would not only do violence to the Constitution's text but would also mean states would be unable to prevent "'fraudulent or unqualified candidates such as minors, out-of-state residents, or foreign nationals' from running for office." And "[n]either the Constitution, nor Supreme Court precedent, nor common sense supports that irrational result." E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. Kolon Industries, 637 F.3d 435 (4th Cir. 2011) Wynn authored one of the first opinions applying the plausibility pleading standard set forth in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), to an attempted monopolization case under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The opinion discusses at length what types of facts a complaint must allege to sufficiently plead a relevant geographic market. Madison Lecture The Madison Lecture, "the most important lecture series" at NYU School of Law, is "designed to enhance the appreciation of civil liberty and strengthen the sense of national purpose." Wynn's 2020 lecture explained his definition of judicial activism, exemplified by the Supreme Court's decision in Rucho v. Common Cause. He proposed that a court engages in judicial activism if it fails to consider well-established decisional tools that are relevant to deciding a particular case. Wynn contended that textualism is a type of judicial activism because it permits judges to disregard legislative history. Wynn further argued that Rucho is an activist opinion because it disregarded several well-established decisional tools. Publications When Judges and Justices Throw Out Tools: Judicial Activism in Rucho v. Common Cause, 96 N.Y.U. Law Review 607 (2021) Opinion: As a judge, I have to follow the Supreme Court. It should fix this mistake, The Washington Post (2020) State v. Mann, 13 N.C. 263 (N.C. 1830): Judicial Choice or Judicial Duty, 87 North Carolina Law Review 991 (2009) Judicial Diversity: Where Independence and Accountability Meet, 67 Albany Law Review 775 (2004) Ground to Stand on: Charles Hamilton Houston’s Legal Foundation for Dr. King, 9 N.C. Bar. J. (2004) Judging the Judges, Marquette University Law Review, 86 Marq. L. Rev. 753, Spring 2003 Military Courts and the All Writs Act: Who Supervises the Military Justice System?, Judges Journal, American Bar Association, Vol. 45, No. 3 Selected honors and awards The North Carolina Law Review, the law journal of the University of North