Introductory/Roadmap (Issue and Rule), Explanation, Application, Conclusion) CLEO (Claim, Law, Evaluation, Outcome) CRAAC (Conclusion, Rules, Analogous Case (if applicable), Application, Conclusion. This is mostly used for writing assignments. CRRACC (Conclusion, Rule, Rule Proof, Application, Counterargument, Conclusion) CRAB (Conclusion Rule Analysis Basis) CREAC (Conclusion, Rules, Explanation, Application, Conclusion) FIRAC (Facts, Issues, Relevant Legal Provisions and Rules, Application of Rules, Conclusion) HIRAC (Heading, Issue, Rule, Analysis/Application, Conclusion) IDAR (Issues, Doctrine, Application, Result). ILAC (Issue, Law, Application, Conclusion) IRAAC (Issue, Rule, Analogous Cases, Application, Conclusion) KUWAIT (Konclusion, Utility, Wording, Answer, Initiation, Thoughts) TREACC (Topic, Rule, Explanation, Analysis, Counterarguments, Conclusion) TRIAccC (Topic, Rule, Issues, Analysis [cases, conclusion], Conclusion) TREAT (Thesis, Rule, [Rule] Explanation, [Rule] Application, Thesis) TRRAC (Thesis, Rule Statement, Rule Explanation, Application, Conclusion) TUPAC (Topic, Utility, Proof, Analysis, Conclusion) CRuPAC (Conclusion, Rule, Proof, Analysis, Conclusion) MIRAT (Material Facts, Issues, Rules, Application, Tentative Conclusion). CIRAC (Conclusion, Issue, Rules, Application, Conclusion) IPAAC (Issue, Principle, Authority, Application, Conclusion) IRREAC (Issue, Rule, Rule Explanation, Application, Conclusion) IRACDD (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion, Defense, Damages). References External links Legal Reasoning and HIRAC: Australian National University College of Law Explanation of IRAC In Defense of IRAC - a rejoinder to "Why IRAC sucks" Dondal J. Kochan, "Thinking" in a Deweyan Perspective: The Law School Exam as a Case Study for Thinking in Lawyering, 12 395 (2012). Irac Legal writing