allows one to state asymptotic results (as the sample size ), which are understood as a theoretical possibility of fetching new independent observations from the data generating process. The list of assumptions in this case is: iid observations: (xi, yi) is independent from, and has the same distribution as, (xj, yj) for all ; no perfect multicollinearity: is a positive-definite matrix; exogeneity: homoscedasticity: . Time series model The stochastic process {xi, yi} is stationary and ergodic; if {xi, yi} is nonstationary, OLS results are often spurious unless {xi, yi} is co-integrating. The regressors are predetermined: E[xiεi] = 0 for all i = 1, ..., n; The p×p matrix is of full rank, and hence positive-definite; {xiεi} is a martingale difference sequence, with a finite matrix of second moments . Finite sample properties First of all, under the strict exogeneity assumption the OLS estimators and s2 are unbiased, meaning that their expected values coincide with the true values of the parameters:[proof] If the strict exogeneity does not hold (as is the case with many time series models, where exogeneity is assumed only with respect to the past shocks but not the future ones), then these estimators will be biased in finite samples. The variance-covariance matrix (or simply covariance matrix) of is equal to In particular, the standard error of each coefficient is equal to square root of the j-th diagonal element of this matrix. The estimate of this standard error is obtained by replacing the unknown quantity σ2 with its estimate s2. Thus, It can also be easily shown that the estimator is uncorrelated with the residuals from the model: The Gauss–Markov theorem states that under the spherical errors assumption (that is, the errors should be uncorrelated and homoscedastic) the estimator is efficient in the class of linear unbiased estimators. This is called the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE). Efficiency should be understood as if we were to find some other estimator which would be linear in y and unbiased, then in the sense that this is a nonnegative-definite matrix. This theorem establishes optimality only in the class of linear unbiased estimators, which is quite restrictive. Depending on the distribution of the error terms ε, other, non-linear estimators may provide better results than OLS. Assuming normality The properties listed so far are all valid regardless of the underlying distribution of the error terms. However, if you are willing to assume that