changes in seismological understanding that "fall outside the current bounds of consensus-level acceptability". Whether the Gutenberg-Richter relation is inapplicable at the scale of individual faults, or some basis of the model is incorrect, "will be equally profound scientifically, and quite consequential with respect to hazard." See also Notes Sources . . Also California Geological Survey Special Report 228, and Southern California Earthquake Center Publication 1792. Also published in the BSSA as . . . . . . . . External links USGS Fact Sheet on UCERF3 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) UCERF3 website (WGCEP) USGS Open-File Report 2013–1165, with appendices and supplemental material. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) California Geological Survey (CGS) Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) CGS Fault Activity Map Can earthquakes be predicted? (USGS) A good explanation. Recent earthquakes in California and elsewhere (SCEC) Latest earthquakes in the U.S. and the world (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Maps and related resources (USGS) Quaternary Fault and Fold Database(USGS) Earthquake and seismic risk mitigation Seismic faults of California