though R (Seymour-Smith) v Secretary of State for Employment left open a ‘disadvantage-led approach’. In some cases it could be an alert for discrimination, but in this situation with the 1 to 1.44 ratio, it was not significant enough. So the Tribunal erred in totally ignoring the effect of an ‘advantage led approach’. See also UK labour law Unfair dismissal Notes References United Kingdom labour case law House of Lords cases 2006 in case law 2006 in British law