They guaranteed every club's eligibility to receive funding provided they had open memberships, the right to be allocated an appropriate level of funding in the budget process to function effectively, the right to use that funding in carrying forth their respective missions when submitting vouchers, and required the Senate to institute even-handed, non-discriminatory budgeting criteria when allocating those funds. And, that no separate criteria would be established for receiving funding. Additionally, because of the changes, every club retains the right under Article II, Section 3.7.c. to appeal their budgets to the judicial branch should there ever be an instance of funding discrimination. A separate amendment was postponed until later in the Fall that year by Vice-President of Student Affairs Peter Baigent and Associate Vice-President of Student Affairs / Dean of Students Jerry Stein. That amendment allowed simply the amount of the Student Activity Fee to be set by a binding referendum. After the postponement, a united delegation of USG Reform and SUCCESS senators and executive council members traveled to the SUNY Assembly in Albany to press the USG's rights to have a Student Activity Fee referendum included in the Constitution, so that any fee increases or decreases would be by popular vote. Ultimately, the ballot to amend the Constitution was allowed by school administrators, ratified by the undergraduate student body, and today appears in Article XI, Section 3 of the Constitution. Several other reforms were instituted later that academic year under the leadership of the SUCCESS coalition, including the student tutoring program, PASS, which drew bipartisan support. The agency is headed up by the Vice President of Academic Affairs, and received $14,000 in the 2014-15 academic year. In Fall 2007, attempts began to pass a new USG constitution based more strictly on the United States Constitution, but would have stripped clubs of the explicit, constitutional rights that had just been secured a year prior, including the right of judicial review over club budgets in the event of funding discrimination. It also would have removed the right of the undergraduate student body to vote on the amount of the Student Activity Fee, instead giving that power to the Senate. When clubs were alerted to the changes, although the new constitution's framers assured concerned club leaders subsequent legislation would restore nominal club rights via legislation, voters were not convinced and the reforms were defeated soundly at the ballot box by more than