In mathematics, the method of dominant balance is used to determine the asymptotic behavior of solutions to an ordinary differential equation without fully solving the equation. The process is iterative, in that the result obtained by performing the method once can be used as input when the method is repeated, to obtain as many terms in the asymptotic expansion as desired. The process goes as follows: Assume that the asymptotic behavior has the form Make an informed guess as to which terms in the ODE might be negligible in the limit of interest. Drop these terms and solve the resulting simpler ODE. Check that the solution is consistent with step 2. If this is the case, then one has the controlling factor of the asymptotic behavior; otherwise, one needs try dropping different terms in step 2, instead. Repeat the process to higher orders, relying on the above result as the leading term in the solution. Example For arbitrary constants and , consider This differential equation cannot be solved exactly. However, it is useful to consider how the solutions behave for large : it turns out that behaves like as x → ∞ . More rigorously, we will have , not . Since we are interested in the behavior of in the large limit, we change variables to = exp(S(x)), and re-express the ODE in terms of S(x), or where we have used the product rule and chain rule to evaluate the derivatives of . Now suppose first that a solution to this ODE satisfies as x → ∞, so that as x → ∞. Obtain then the dominant asymptotic behaviour by setting If satisfies the above asymptotic conditions, then the above assumption is consistent. The terms we dropped will have been negligible with respect to the ones we kept. is not a solution to the ODE for , but it represents the dominant asymptotic behavior, which is what we are interested in. Check that this choice for is consistent, Everything is indeed consistent. Thus the dominant asymptotic behaviour of a solution to our ODE has been found, By convention, the full asymptotic series is written as so to get at least the first term of this series we have to take a further step to see if there is a power of out the front. Proceed by introducing a new subleading dependent variable, and then seek asymptotic solutions for C(x).