acts that would be considered crimes if committed by adults. The concept of human rights Chapter 15, "'Human Rights' As Property Rights", argues that the concept of "rights" makes sense only as property rights. Human rights, when not seen as property rights, turn out to be vague and contradictory, leading to their weakening on behalf of "public policy" or the "public good." Rothbard provides an example of free speech, where there is no such thing as a separate "right to free speech"; there is only a man's property right: the right to do as he wills with his own or to make voluntary agreements with other property owners. He argues that couching the analysis in terms of a "right to free speech" instead of property rights leads to confusion and the weakening of the very concept of rights. He also argues that the most famous example of shouting "Fire" falsely in a crowded theater implies no need for the law to weaken the absolute nature of rights when analyzed in terms of property rights. The author concludes that human rights and property rights are identical and that human rights lose their absoluteness and clarity when property rights are not used as the standard. Then, Rothbard explores the allocation of scarce resources like time and space, such as in assembly halls or newspapers. He argues that, instead of relying on vague concepts of free speech and assembly rights, it is more appropriate to frame these rights in terms of private property. He suggests that the owner of the resource, whether it be a radio producer or a newspaper editor, has the right to allocate it as they see fit. In cases where there is a shortage of a resource, the allocation could be done through price systems. The right to free speech and assembly should be understood as part of a person's general right to their property, including their right to make mutually agreed-upon contracts and exchanges with the owners of other properties. The solution is to focus on the right of private property and recognize that the right to free speech is simply a subdivision of property rights. Rothbard says that "in general, those problems where rights seem to require weakening are ones where the locus of ownership is not precisely defined, in short where property rights are muddled", and street or governmental assemblies become a source of conflict. Rothbard