compromise an election. The report states that "the software of SERVE is totally closed and proprietary", an inadequate inspection of SERVE before its launch allowed it "to be vulnerable to various forms of programmer attacks". This is critical information in the voting world. According to the report, a potential hack into SERVE "could result in large-scale, selective voter disenfranchisement, and/or privacy violation, and/or vote buying and selling, and/or vote switching even to the extent of reversing the outcome of many elections at once". This means that if SERVE is implemented, elections as important as the Presidential could be completely fraudulent without any trace of a culprit. Finally, it was the critics' place to suggest any potential solutions that could remedy SERVE's vulnerabilities. Their report states, "that the vulnerabilities described cannot be fixed by design changes or bug fixes to SERVE," it explains that, "the vulnerabilities are fundamental in the architecture of the Internet and of the PC hardware and software that is ubiquitous today". It concludes that "there really is no good way to build such a voting system without a radical change in overall architecture of the Internet or some unforeseen security breakthrough". Related experiments As discussed by many experts, including a project manager at the Center for Public Integrity and a research fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, security was the largest threat to the SERVE program. These security risks were put to the test in 2010 when J. Alex Halderman, a professor of Computer Science at the University of Michigan, took on a challenge issued by the District of Columbia to see if Halderman's students could hack their new Internet Voting system. Halderman's Computer Science students were quickly successful. The students not only managed to disable the system but also were able to add votes, change votes, and manipulate the program so that once voters cast their ballots, the University of Michigan fight song would play. These hacking results were immediately turned over to the DC system team in order to strengthen the security wall of the program. Within days, the DC experiment was terminated as the security risks were deemed too high and the threats of fraud and corruption were undeniable. Subsequent studies have reinforced the enormous difficulty of the requirements for secure online voting, and defined the research and development needed in creating end-to-end auditable voting systems. MOVE Act In order to give overseas