comes from Crump, who states that societal outrage at the offense is a justification for the rule. Crump argues that the rule distinguishes crimes that cause human death thereby reinforcing the "reverence for human life." He also argues that the condemnation represents society's "expression of solidarity with the victim's of the crime" which is useful because it reaffirms to the victim's family "the kinship society as a whole" feels for them. References External links Enmund v. Florida from findlaw.com Tison v. Arizona from findlaw.com Enmund v. Florida from LII, Cornell University Enmund/Tison requirement described by Arizona Supreme Court