to whether donning and doffing activities by urban park rangers were "integral and indispensable," as required to be compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation, 808 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2015): Sack, writing for the panel, held that the Alien Tort Statute did not confer original jurisdiction over claims of terrorism victims against bank that allegedly financed and facilitated organizations who committed attacks in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc., 774 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 2014): Sack, writing for the panel, held that the evidence supported an intentional infliction of emotional distress verdict, where an African-American steelworker was subject to an abusive work environment replete with racial insults, intimidation, and degradation; jury's award of $1.32 million in compensatory damages was proper, although award of $24 million in punitive damages, which was later remitted to $5 million, was excessive. Bailey v. Pataki, 708 F.3d 391 (2d Cir. 2013): Sack, writing for the panel, held that the due process right to notice and an adversarial hearing prior to involuntary civil commitment to a psychiatric facility was clearly established, and thus defendants, who included the former Governor of New York and various state officials, were not entitled to qualified immunity. Marvel Characters, Inc. v. Kirby, 726 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2013): Sack, writing for the panel, held that children of influential comic book artist Jack Kirby, who produced drawings for Marvel Comics, had no rights to Kirby's works between 1958 and 1963 because those drawings were "works made for hire" within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976. United States v. Stewart, 686 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2012) (Stewart II): Sack, writing for the panel, held that in the resentencing of Lynne Stewart, her First Amendment rights were not abridged when the district court considered her public statements as a basis for quadrupling her original sentence; such use of public statements did not impermissibly chill speech. Barclays Capital, Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, 650 F.3d 876 (2d Cir. 2011): Sack, writing for the panel, concluded that the tort of hot news misappropriation was preempted by the Copyright Act as applied to the facts of the instant case, which concerned a novel lawsuit by various investment banks, which publish and disseminate equity research reports, against a small Internet-based aggregator of stock tips which sold the investment banks' recommendations to