Grandfather's Counterinsurgency How to Think About Counterinsurgency After Afghanistan The Future of Strategic Leadership Globalization and American Security After the Coronavirus Crisis Future Warfare: The Two Dimensional Security Challenge Why The ISIS Threat Is As Old As Cold War Bunk Decisionmaking in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM: The Strategic Shift of 2007Decisionmaking in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM: Removing Saddam Hussein by ForceUnruly Clients: The Trouble with Allies New Challenges and Old Concepts: Understanding 21st Century Insurgency Restructuring America’s Ground Forces: Better, Not Bigger Rethinking Insurgency Strategies for Asymmetric Threats to US National Security Learning from Iraq: Counterinsurgency in American Strategy Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in the 21st Century ; Future War/Future Battlespace; Asymmetry and U.S. Military Strategy; Armed Conflict in the 21st Century; "Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq"; ; La guerre asymétrique et l'avenir de l'Occident; The Psychology of War ; Mission Creep Dispatch ; Insurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan ; The Civilian Surge Myth How Obama's Surge Is Like Bush's Metz is the author of Iraq and the Evolution of American Strategy. Concepts Metz has proposed several new concepts for the analysis of military strategy and national security policy: Psychological precision: the idea that modern militaries should be designed so that their operations attain desired psychological effects rather than simply hitting targets with precision. This concept was discussed in the 2001 "Year in Ideas" essay in the New York Times Effects based planning for counterinsurgency: the idea that counterinsurgency planning should be determined by an array of psychological effects Ethical asymmetry: the idea that normative differences between opponents in armed conflict is an important feature of 21st century warfare Cultural asymmetry and counterinsurgency: the idea that the United States' approach to counterinsurgency support only works in nations with Western or Western-derived cultures Personal versus strategic motives in insurgency: the idea that insurgencies where strategic motives—those directed toward a desired political outcome—dominate differ in significant ways from ones where personal motives—the desire for revenge, prestige, or material gain—drive most insurgents. New technological revolution for counterinsurgency: the idea that technology can, to some extent, substitute for labor in counterinsurgency, but not simply through the application of technology developed for conventional warfighting. A technological revolution for counterinsurgency (and other forms of asymmetric and irregular conflict) should be based on robotics (including micro- and nano-robotics), nonlethality, and psychotechnology. "Metz threshold": counterinsurgency must achieve acceptable performance before political patience runs out, requiring an organizational learning response and the