role of presiding member in each of specific cases. For example, former Justice Kang Il-won was 'Justice in charge' () in Impeachment of Park Geun-hye case, so he presided much of hearings, though official presiding member of the Full bench at that time was former Justice Lee Jung-mi as acting President of the Court. Case naming Cases in the Constitutional Court are named as following rule. First two or four digit Arabic numbers indicate the year when the case is filed. And the following case code composed of Alphabets are categorized into eight; Hun-Ka, Na, Da, Ra, Ma, Ba, Sa and A. Each of the code matches with specific jurisdiction of the Court. The last serial number is given in the order of case filing of each year. Jurisdiction Scope of jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court is defined in article 111(1) of the Constitution of South Korea, as following five categories; Adjudication on (1) constitutionality of statutes, (2) impeachment, (3) dissolution of a political party, (4) competence dispute and (5) constitutional complaint. While organizational status of South Korean Constitutional Court is mostly influenced from Austria, scope of jurisdiction is mostly influenced from Germany. Judicial review of statutes According to article 111(1), 1. of the Constitution, the Constitutional Court may review constitutionality of law upon request of the courts. This is power of judicial review () is officially named as Adjudication on the constitutionality of statutes () in Chapter 4, Section 1 of the Constitutional Court Act, most prominent power of the Court. Since the power requires request from ordinary courts as preliminary condition for adjudication, and the ordinary courts of South Korea follows adversarial system as Nemo iudex sine actore, this power of Adjudication on the constitutionality of statutes is interpreted as power of 'concrete review of statutes' (, ), rather than 'abstract review of statutes' (, ). It means judicial review on statute under article 111(1) 1. of the South Korean Constitution strictly requires specific case on-going in ordinary court as preliminary condition, and that case should cover issue on applying such statute. Any interested parties can claim to ordinary court to make request of judicial review to the Constitutional Court. When the court accept claim and makes request, on-going case in ordinary court is suspended by article 42(1) of the Act, until the Constitutional Court makes decision. It is notable that according to article 41(1) of the Act,