the Act is detour for Adjudication on the constitutionality of statutes (or judicial review) denied by ordinary courts. It is usually called as '' in Korean, which means constitutional complaint especially on statutes. As this type of constitutional complaint is designed as detour for judicial review, the preliminary conditions required in Prior review for constitutional complaint under article 68(2) is different from the complaints under article 68(1) of the Act. It does not require any possible remedies to be exhausted already, but requires the plaintiff was dismissed of claim for judicial review from the ordinary court about on-going case of the plaintiff. It is notifiable that on-going case is not automatically sustained during Adjudication on Constitutional complaint by article 68(2) of the Act. Statistics Below are the aggregated statistics as of 09 Feb 2021. International relations Venice Commission : As the Republic of Korea is a member state of the Venice Commission, one of associate Justices in Constitutional Court of Korea becomes member for the Commission. Substitute members are conventionally designated in following two positions; Deputy Secretary General at the Court's Department of Court Administration, and Deputy Minister of Ministry of Justice. Current member is Justice Lee Suk-Tae. Association of Asian Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Institutions : The Republic of Korea is founding member state of the Association of Asian Constitutional Courts & Equivalent Institutions (AACC), and seat for permanent secretariat of the AACC. President of the Constitutional Court of Korea attends the Board of AACC as representing the Republic of Korea. Criticism and Issues It is noteworthy that according to the article 113(1) of South Korean Constitution, the Constitutional Court cannot make upholding decision when there's not enough number of Justices appointed to meet quorum, yet there is no contingency plan for massive vacancy of Justices. While there is no contingency plan in the Constitution, even article 6(4) and (5) of Constitutional Court Act only requires vacancy should be filled in 30 days, without any meaningful contingency plan when such 30 days passes. This situation makes the Constitutional Court of Korea vulnerable to be paralyzed by politics between the President of South Korea and the legislature. While this problem is also happening in the Supreme Court of Korea, the problem of the Constitutional Court is much worse as the article 113(1) strictly requires there should be at least six Constitutional Court Justices to make upholding decision. The Supreme Court