important in the case of the s.122(1)(b) duty of care, as opposed to the subjective motivation of the director or officer, which is the central focus of the statutory fiduciary duty of s.122(1)(a) of the CBCA. They then noted that the duty of care will be satisfied where the director acts "prudently and on a reasonably informed basis." They also affirmed the use of the business judgment rule in Canada, stating, "Courts are ill-suited and should be reluctant to second-guess the application of business expertise... they are capable, on the facts of any case, of determining whether an appropriate degree of prudence and diligence was brought to bear in reaching what is claimed to be a reasonable business decision." Notes See also List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court) External links case summary Supreme Court of Canada cases Canadian corporate case law 2004 in Canadian case law