); (lit. "Tom saw I yesterday"I saw yesterday); (lit. "Fish likes the cat"The cat likes ). In the last example, it is highly unlikely that fish is the subject and so that word order can be used. In some languages, auxiliary rules of word order can provide enough disambiguation for an emphatic use of OVS. For example, declarative statements in Danish are ordinarily SVnO, with "n" being is the position of negating or modal adverbs. However, OVSn may be used to emphasize the object if there is no ambiguity. Thus, (Susanne does not love Omar) and (Omar is someone whom Susanne does not love) have neither Omar nor Susanne marked for case but mean the same except for emphasis. The flexibility of word order in Russian also allows for OVS sentences, generally to emphasize the subject: (lit. "I finished mission") versus (lit. "Mission finished I"It was who finished the mission). In Turkish, OVS may be used to emphasize the verb. For example, (lit. "the glass broke John": John broke the glass) is a better answer to the question "What happened to the glass?" than the regular SOV sentence (lit. "John the glass broke"). Absolutive–verb–ergative At least five languages have been documented (Makushi, Arekuna, Päri, Mangarayi, and Selk’nam) that use OVS order in transitive clauses but SV order in intransitive clauses. Since all of those languages have ergative–absolutive alignment, their word order is not object–verb–subject in the traditional sense but might be more accurately described as absolutive–verb–ergative (AVE) (see also syntactic ergativity). At least three of those languages (Makushi, Arekuna, and Päri) mark absolutive agreement on a verb with a prefix and ergative agreement with a suffix, which indicates an AVE-like structure on a deeper syntactic level. In constructed languages The object–verb–subject sequence also occurs in Interlingua although the Interlingua Grammar makes no mention of it accepting passive voice. Thomas Breinstrup, the editor-in-chief of Panorama in Interlingua, sometimes uses the sequence in articles written for Panorama. This sequence was chosen for the constructed language Klingon, a language spoken by the extraterrestrial Klingon race in the fictional universe of the Star Trek series, to make the language sound deliberately alien and counterintuitive. That sequence, like the other five, is acceptable in Esperanto. Theoretical analysis Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum note that some SOV languages (such as Wichita) allow rightward movement of the subject noun phrase in certain sentences, producing OVS