is installed on a busy street, in which one of the hustlers hides and records the information on the user's cards magnetic strip along with their PIN obtained from the user typing on the keypad. Alex and Jess view a car which is for sale. They are given the opportunity to drive the Jaguar. During test driving the car with the owner, Jess who is pregnant, pretends to be in labour. Alex comforts Jess from the passenger side and strongly suggests to the car owner that he should get out of the car and make his way to the back seat to help Jess, which he does. However Alex immediately locks the car doors and takes off with the stolen car. Paul and Alex hire a van and buy uniforms, a decal sticker for the van and other items to give the impression that they're custom agents. The scam heavily relies on the power of authority. They spot a van packed with alcohol from Calais and pretend to uphold the law by seizing all of the cases of alcohol, and even order the marks to put the alcohol from their car and into the van by themselves. In Series 8, for the first time in the show's history, a mark was not fooled by the initial scam. The scam was not pulled by the usual hustlers, but by model Caprice Bourret in a section that features celebrities performing the scams. The scam was to switch genuine twenty-pound notes with fake ones, and then exchange those fake ones for genuine tens with a shop assistant. When Caprice asked for tens and fives, the shop assistant spotted the partly hidden genuine twenties and recognized that the others were fake, so she refused to exchange them. Presenter Jess, who was nearby should anything go wrong, rushed out of the shop to alert Alex and Paul, who quickly came into the shop and confiscated the money by pretending to be police officers. Controversy In February 2011, it was reported that some of the "marks" in the programme were paid actors rather than innocent members of the public. Following a BBC investigation, the BBC Trust concluded that although some segments may have misled viewers as to the context of participants' involvement, and that those episodes should not be broadcast again, there was no serious breach of broadcasting guidelines. Although some "marks" had previously worked as