Pāṇini because of Cardona's distinguished authority, also notes several of Cardona's departures from conventional analyses. This includes, for instance, Cardona's deliberate commitment to the Indian commentarial tradition in its analysis of accent derivation. Legacy Cardona's legacy is most felt in the discipline of Indian linguistics where he has exemplified ‒ indeed, championed ‒ an approach that seeks to describe and appreciate the techniques of the Indian grammarians. To an extent, Cardona may be characterized as 'historical' and 'philological' in his methodology. However, Cardona has concerned himself with the textual and historically explanatory aims of these approaches ‒ which were, in fact, the goals of earlier philological indology ‒ only insofar as they have enabled him to recover and uncover the linguistic science itself encoded in texts like Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī. In other words, textual analysis and historical explanation are incidental to Cardona's central priority to treat Pāṇini as an Indian linguist. As fidelity to the tradition figures prominently for Cardona, he has been mostly critical of attempts to compare Pāṇini and the Pāṇinīyas with modern Western grammatical notions. This stance, moreover, has served as a wellspring for debate, most notably with J.F. Staal and Paul Kiparsky. Along these lines, Brian Joseph's depiction of Cardona as a "luminary" in Pāṇinian linguistics warrants an assessment of Cardona as a veritable Pāṇinīya, carrying on the age-old exegetical tradition of Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī. Publications 1962 R̥gvedic śrúvat. Journal of the Oriental Institute, Baroda 12:1-4 1963 Greek heîsa and Sanskrit sátsat. Language 39:14-16 1964 The formulation of Pāṇini. 7.3.73. Journal of the Oriental Institute, Baroda 14:38-41 1965 A Gujarati reference grammar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 188 [circulated in duplicated form (pp. xv, 305), 1964] On translating and formalizing Pāṇinian rules. Journal of the Oriental Institute, Baroda 14:306-314 1966 The Indo-European thematic aorists. University Microfilms. Pp. 159 [doctoral dissertation, defended in 1960] 1967 Negations in Pāṇinian rules. Language 43 (Bloch Memorial Volume):34-56 Pāṇini's syntactic categories. Journal of the Oriental Institute, Baroda 16:201-215 1968 On haplology in Indo-European. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (=Haney Foundation Series 1), pp. 87 1969 Studies in Indian grammarians, I: The method of description reflected in the śivasūtras. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, 59.1, p. 48 1970 Some principles of Pāṇini's grammar. Journal of Indian Philosophy 1:40-74 The Indo-Iranian construction manā [mama] kr̥tam. Language 46:1-12 A note on Pāṇini's technical vocabulary. Journal of the Oriental Institute, Baroda 19:195-212 1974