to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds. Administration The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) is the administrative, quasi-judicial tribunal tasked with hearing complaints that the code has been violated. It has the power to grant damages and specific performance to remedy discriminatory acts. The HRTO is subject to judicial review by the Divisional Court of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Before June 30, 2008, human rights complaints were filed with the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC), which investigated claims of discrimination. Since June 30, 2008, claims of discrimination are filed directly with the HRTO, leaving the OHRC to concentrate its resources on systemic discrimination, public education and policy development. Content The code is divided into an introductory section, or "preamble", followed by seven parts. Part I sets out basic rights and responsibilities. Part II explains how the code is interpreted and applied. Part III explains the role and structure of the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC). Part IV explains the role and structure of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO). Part IV.1 establishes the Human Rights Legal Support Centre (HRLSC) and sets out its governance. Part V deals with general matters such as the power to make regulations and sets out that the Human Rights Code has primacy over other provincial legislation (section 47(2)). Part VI of the code deals with the transition from the "old" system, where complaints were investigated by the Ontario Human Rights Commission to the "new" system (which took effect on June 30, 2008) where applications are now filed directly with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario without any investigation. Application The code does not apply to federally regulated activities, such as banking, intra-provincial transportation, aeronautics and telecommunications, which are subject to the Canadian Human Rights Act. According to HRTO adjudicator, the Code only protects people with protected grounds from not being discriminated. The victim has the burden to prove the discrimination is due to his/her protected grounds. The HRTO stated it that it had no jurisdiction to ordinary people human rights abuse complaint. People disagree with HRTO think the principle and intention of the Human Rights Code (Ontario) are to protect public, not just people with protected grounds from human rights abuse. See also Human Rights Legal Support Centre Ontario Human Rights Commission Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Canadian Human Rights Act Human Rights Code (British