33 1739 it vg bo eth (man, the Lord) - c2 A Ψ 81 104 181 Majority of manuscripts (deadly perils) - 630 1739c itd, e syrp, h goth (a deadly peril) - Majority of manuscripts - (singular reading) - Majority of manuscripts - (singular reading) - Majority of manuscripts - (singular reading) - Majority of manuscripts Provenance The provenance of the papyrus is unknown. Kenyon believed this codex and the other Beatty Biblical Papyri came from the region of the Fayyum. The coptologist Carl Schmidt was told that the books were found in "‘Alâlme, a village on the east bank of the Nile in the area of Aṭfiḥ, ancient Aphroditopolis." However, the archaeologists who bought the University of Michigan's portion of the codex believed that it had come from Asyut (ancient Lykopolis). Thus, there is no consensus on the precise find spot. Date As with all manuscripts dated solely by palaeography, the dating of is uncertain. H. A. Sanders, the first editor of parts of the papyrus, proposed a date possibly as late as the second half of the 3rd century. F. G. Kenyon, editor of the complete editio princeps, preferred a date in the first half of the 3rd century. The manuscript is now sometimes dated to about 200. Young Kyu Kim has argued for an exceptionally early date of c. 80. Kim's dating has been widely rejected. Griffin critiqued and disputed Kim's dating, placing the 'most probable date' between 175–225, with a '95% confidence interval' for a date between 150–250. Comfort and Barrett have claimed shares palaeographical affinities with the following: P. Oxy. 8 (assigned late 1st or early 2nd century), P. Oxy. 841 (the second hand, which cannot be dated later than 125–50), P. Oxy. 1622 (dated with confidence to pre-148, probably during the reign of Hadrian (117–38), because of the documentary text on the verso), P. Oxy. 2337 (assigned to the late 1st century), P. Oxy. 3721 (assigned to the second half of the 2nd century), P. Rylands III 550 (assigned to the 2nd century), and P. Berol. 9810 (early 2nd century). They conclude this points to a date during the middle of the 2nd century for . More recently, in a wide-ranging survey of the dates of New Testament papyri, P. Orsini and W. Clarysse have assigned "to the early third century," specifically "excluding dates in the first or the first half of the