Wikipedia. A panel hosted by the institute endorsed the idea so that congressional staffers could use their time to write neutral and informative articles about proposed legislation to better educate the public. Experts on the panel considered the two main obstacles to doing this as being skepticism towards Wikipedia and the history of biased editing from Congressional staffers. The Cato Institute suggested one way to overcome these issues would be for the staffers to create user accounts and user profile pages disclosing their connections with Congress. See also Wikipedia coverage of American politics Wikipedia:Congressional staffer edits References External links David Mehegan Bias, sabotage haunt Wikipedia's free world The Boston Globe, February 12, 2006 2000s controversies in the United States 2010s controversies in the United States 2000s in American politics 2010s in American politics Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia Wikipedia Employees of the United States Congress History of Wikipedia Wikipedia controversies