Proceratosaurus is a genus of carnivorous theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of England. Proceratosaurus was a small dinosaur, measuring in length and in body mass. Its name refers to how it was originally thought to be an ancestor of Ceratosaurus, due to the partially preserved portion of the crest of Proceratosaurus superficially resembling the small crest of Ceratosaurus. Now, however, it is considered a coelurosaur, specifically a member of the family Proceratosauridae, and amongst the earliest known members of the clade Tyrannosauroidea. The type specimen is held in the Natural History Museum in London and was described in 1910 from oolitic limestone of the Great Oolite Group near Minchinhampton while excavating for a reservoir. History of discovery In 1910, the British paleontologist Arthur Smith Woodward reported a partial theropod skull discovered some time prior by F. Lewis Bradley during excavation for a reservoir at Minchinhampton, a town in the Cotswolds in Gloucestershire, England. Bradley had prepared the skull so that the left side was exposed, and submitted it to the Geological Society of London, which is currently housed at the Natural History Museum catalogued as specimen NHM R 4860. The upper part of the skull missing due to a fissure that had eroded the rock, and was partially filled with calcite. Woodward made the skull the holotype specimen of a new species of Megalosaurus (a genus named in 1824), M. bradleyi, in honour of its discoverer. At the time it was discovered, it was one of the most complete theropod skulls known from Europe, possibly with the exception of the crushed and hard to interpret skulls of Compsognathus and Archaeopteryx. In 1923, the German palaeontologist Friedrich von Huene moved the species to the new genus Proceratosaurus, assuming it was the ancestor of the Jurassic genus Ceratosaurus, but since the name was only used in a schematic, the name has been considered a nomen nudum, an invalidly published name. He validated the name three years later in two 1926 articles by providing a diagnosis of the genus. While remaining one of the best preserved theropod skulls in Europe, and globally one of the best preserved Middle Jurassic theropod skulls, it since received little scientific attention, mainly being mentioned in studies about general aspects of theropod anatomy and evolution. The holotype skull was since CT scanned at the University of Texas, further mechanically prepared to reveal additional details of the