insists in the preface to the second edition that the assessment of the evidence should be left to the reader. Seebold also criticises some of the conjectured meanings. Rix calls this criticism basically legitimate. Meier-Brügger tentatively calls the LIVs aspect hypothesis “adequate and capable of consensus” (), without agreeing on all of the details of the analysis. Fortson calls the LIV “[v]ery useful and up-to-date – though in various places controversial”, but does not elaborate on the controversial places. Ringe states that the theories in Rix (what he terms the “Cowgill-Rix verb”) largely reflect current consensus, but implies that some of his phonological reconstructions may go beyond the consensus (in terms of being insufficiently “conservative”). See also Proto-Indo-European verb Other PIE dictionaries and grammars Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen (published 1886–1916 by Karl Brugmann and Berthold Delbrück) Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW, first published 1956 by Julius Pokorny), with reconstructions pre-dating the laryngeal theory Indo-European Etymological Dictionary, an ongoing project based in Leiden, intended to result in the publication of a comprehensive Indo-European etymological dictionary Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon (NIL), structured similarly to the LIV and treating PIE nouns and adjectives Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme (LIPP), structured similarly to the LIV and treating PIE particles and pronouns. References External links Addenda und Corrigenda zu LIV². HTML or PDF. Latest update: 3 Feb. 2015. Pokorny PIE Data (University of Texas) Indogermanisches Wörterbuch by Gerhard Köbler (based on the IEW and including laryngeal-based reconstructions, but only as alternative lemmas with cross references to the pre-laryngeal ones) 1998 non-fiction books Indo-European linguistics works Etymological dictionaries