in a participatory way. However, this might still pose a problem. Since in the past donors were unable to impose content effectively in the client country's policies, it seems unlikely that donors would be able to impose process standards in making a PRSP. It has already been shown that donor's attempts to influence domestic politics have not been successful in the past. Furthermore, international financial institutions do in fact evaluate PRSP content, not process alone. A clear definition of what civil participation means has not been laid out by the IMF or World Bank. This creates a problem when evaluating one of the key requirements of the PRSP, which is that it has to be formulated with civil participation. In fact, participation that involves the population working with the government to develop specific strategies to reduce poverty doesn't exist in any developing country. This seems to suggest that the WB and IMF approve PRSPs regardless of the fulfillment of this condition. See also Poverty reduction Poverty Reduction Strategy in Honduras References Further reading Jeremy Gould (ed), The New Conditionality: The Politics of Poverty Reduction Strategies, Zed Books 2005 Caillods, F. Hallak, J. 2004. Education and PRSPs: a review of experiences. Paris: IIEP/UNESCO. External links A selection of up-to-date resources on the PRSP approach and its implementation in developing countries can be found in the Governance and Social Development Resource Centre's topic guide on poverty reduction strategy papers PRSPs at the IMF PRSPs at the World Bank Third World Network Paper on PRSPs World Bank Government documents Poverty