the verb noun -telь- is related to -talla found in the Hittite language and is not used in the Baltic languages. The equivalents of the Slavic participle with the suffix -lъ can be found in Armenian and Tocharian languages but not in the Baltic ones. The Baltic first person singular verb ending -mai does not exist in the Slavic languages. The common Baltic verb suffix -sto- does not exist in the Slavic languages. The common Baltic adjective suffix -ing- does not exist in the Slavic languages. The Baltic diminutive suffix -l- is not used in the Slavic languages. The Proto-Baltic language did not have separate singular and plural third person verb forms. Proto-Slavic had retained this property. The Slavic languages reflect well the thematic verbs of the 3rd person formants -t: -nt, something that cannot be found in the Baltic languages. Unlike the Slavic languages, the Baltic languages use the suffix -no- to form participles. Unlike the Baltic languages, the Proto-Slavic language had a sigmatic aorist with the suffix -s-. Unlike the Slavic languages, the Baltic languages use the sigmatic future tense. The Proto-Slavic language uses suffix -tь with plural quantitative numericals (e.g.,*pę-tь 5, *šes-tь 6, *devę-tь 9), something that cannot be found in the Baltic languages. Lexicon and semantics According to the Russian linguist S. Bernstein, when examining the lexicon of both language groups, it is important to separate the common heritage and vocabulary innovations of the Proto-Indo-European language from the ones that formed during the contact of Baltic and Slavic languages, which is something Reinhold Trautmann had failed to do. In his Balto-Slavic Dictionary (German: Baltisch–slavisches Wörterbuch), published in 1923, Trautmann presents 1,700 common words but more than 75% of the given vocabulary is not unique to Baltic and Slavic languages as these words can be found in other Indo-European languages, they unite only some of the Baltic or Slavic languages or only belong to one specific language. The opposing linguists of the genetic relationship between Baltic and Slavic languages like Oleg Trubachyov also note that there are notable lexicon and semantic differences that date back to very old times. They emphasize that the most important concepts such as egg, to beat, suffering, girl, oak, chop, pigeon, god, guest, or forger are named differently in Baltic and Slavic languages. According to the Lithuanian linguist Zigmas Zinkevičius, the Baltic and Slavic dictionary of differences would be much more impressive