which went fit was built upon and expanded further deeply, siromani's camp seem to a new system within the new. Siromani was the major spike where the navya system and techniques became very sophasticated and complicated in language and logic, and just like the languages in modern logic the system became unapproachable, not only by common people, but also to the best scholars and philosophers who have learnt from elsewhere. The system was confined in the intellectual environment of mithila, varanasi and navadvipa only but still every philosophical system had a reach to it. Ganeri even notes that the ideas of early enlightenment thinkers like descarte were actually known to Varanasi pundits in 17th century. ganeri says that 16th and 17th century texts reflect a unique characteristic of Indian modernity l, that is not present in text of colonial era, where the central ideas of both old and new system could be willingly gave up on critical investigation, just as much the similar sceptical and new approach of descarte Indian thinkers like siromani started looking at both old and new ideas with a different perspective which tied the past with the future, gangesa is referred to as via antiqua where as siromani as via moderna as for the matter o fact siromani camp considered gangesa navya but siromani as navina (new within the new) V N Jha argues that navya-nyaya languagemust also be introduced and adapted in mainstream philosophical and logical discourse, he claims that navya nyaya theory of inference is more elaborative and complicated, with less ambiguity. See also Late modern philosophy Phases of modernity Notes Citations References Ash, E. (2010). Introduction: Expertise and the Early Modern State. Osiris, 25(1), 1-24. Allhoff, F., Martinich, A., & Vaidya, A. (2007). Early modern philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Arblaster, P. (2017). Early Modern English Catholicism: Identity, Memory and Counter-Reformation. Reformation, 22(2), 147–148. Beatty, J., Leigh, J., & Dean, K. (2008). Philosophy Rediscovered. Journal Of Management Education, 33(1), 99–114. Bica, D. (2020). Thinking with Mechanisms: Mechanical Philosophy and Early Modern Science. Journal Of Early Modern Studies, 9(1), 133–141. Bojanowski, J. (2017). Thinking about cases: Applying Kant's universal law formula. European Journal Of Philosophy, 26(4), 1253–1268. Broad, J. (2020). Early Modern Philosophy: A Perverse Thought Experiment | Blog of the APA. Retrieved 18 April 2021, from https://blog.apaonline.org/2020/10/21/early-modern-philosophy-a-perverse-thought-experiment/ Brooks, T. (2013). In Defence of Political Theory: Impact and Opportunities. Political Studies Review, 11(2), 209–215.