However the requirement that contract for sale of land must be in writing was continued by section 40 of that Act. Section 40 of the Law of Property Act 1925 was repealed by sections 2(8) and 4 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989; however, section 2 of that Act requires that contracts for the sale of land be signed and in writing. All the clauses except the one relating to surety contracts were repealed by section 1 of the Law Reform (Enforcement of Contracts) Act 1954 (2 & 3 Eliz 2 c. 34). This section does not apply (if it would otherwise do so) in relation to a financial collateral arrangement. In 1937, the Law Revision Committee recommended that this section be repealed. Court procedure Sections 10 and 11 deal with the execution of judgments upon equitable interests of cestui que trust in land and held free from the incumbrances of the persons seized in trust. Trust shall be pass by descent to the heir of the cestui que trust subject to charges for the oblation of the decedent, but the heir shall not become chargeable of his own estate for the obligations of the decedent. Section 13 and 14 provide that the effective date for judgments against bona fide purchasers for value of land is the date they are docketed and requiring that judgments of the courts enter the date docketed when signing it without a fee. Section 15 provides that fieri facias or other writs of execution are effective against goods from the date given it is given to the sheriff and the sheriff shall write on the back of it the day, month and year he received it without a fee. Section 17 provides that recognisances shall bind bona fide purchasers for value of land from the time they are enrolled and requiring that the day month and year of the recognisance be entered on the roll without a fee. Section 23 preserves the jurisdiction of ecclesiastical courts to probate wills in personal property subject to the rules of this statute. Court of Probate Act 1857 (20 & 21 Vict c 77) transferred responsibility for the granting of probate from the ecclesiastical courts of England and Wales to a new civil Court of Probate in January 1858. Section 24 proves that the husband may be the administrator of the intestate