between citizen and administration. Restructuring of the Romanian Post. He also created and promoted the "Cre@tive Romania" brand, through which many IT investors became interested and acquainted with Romanian IT sector potential. He initiated the necessary legal framework and regulations, thus Romania succeeding. Zsolt Nagy has implemented internet access in rural areas. He has initiated and formed Romania's e-government strategy. Controversies Zsolt Nagy was accused that, together with the Minister of Justice Tudor Chiuariu, elaborated and signed a Government Decision HG 377/2007, through which a building and its terrain that belong to the Romanian Post was changed as legal regime form publicly owned by the state to the legal regime of privately owned by the state. Zsolt Nagy declared that in 1998 the Romanian Post became a “company” by legal framework and all its properties had to be legally aligned with that regime. Rightfully so, despite the legal trial and the conviction Zsolt Nagy endured, his actions proved to be right, since the Government Decision he initiated has been implemented and is respected until this day. The terrain is even now, 6 years after the trial, still privately owned by the Post, respected and implemented as legal decision, despite the fact that Zsolt Nagy was convicted for it. He has never been accused or convicted of sub-evaluation, taking or giving any material advantages. Zsolt Nagy was also accused that, as a minister, he supported “morally and intellectually” an organized group, in the famous “strategic privatizations” file. There are no facts or proven wrong deeds imputed to Zsolt Nagy, only phone conversations of other thirds parties talking and mentioning his name. He has been suspended from his position. Even though convicted, no privatization took place till this day and no prejudice has been imputed upon him. Finally, in 2016, the Constitutional Court decided and declared that SRI (Romanian Secret Service / Romanian Intelligence) cannot operate any legal prosecution, even though this whole file and trial was based only on phone conversations of third parties. Sadly, these Court Decisions cannot be implemented retroactively. In his defense, after his conviction, four decisions of the Constitutional Court were issued: 1. The Constitutional Court defines the abuse as breaking a law that produces prejudices and unlawful material advantages. Zsolt Nagy never produced any prejudice and was never even accused of this by initiating a Government Decision. On the contrary, it is important to mention that