758 Sadkhan had a statement from detainee 758 submitted as evidence at his Tribunal. In his statement detainee 758 identified himself as "Shaker Al Iraqi (Abass Abdou Erromi)". The official record identifies him as Abbas Habid Rumi Al Naely. He testified that he suspected the accusation against him and detainee 433 were the result of animosity from detainee 111, Ali Abdul Motalib Awayd Hassan Al Tayeea. who he identified as "Ali Abdou Ahtaleb Al Iraqi" and detainee 252, who he identified as "Yassin Basro Al Yamani". The official record shows detainees 111 and 262 as Ali Abdul Motalib Awayd Hassan Al Tayeea and Yasim Muhammed Basardah. Al Naely says he knew Sadkhan in Afghanistan, and he knew him as a good, peaceloving, family man. Al Naely said that the two men he identified as Sadkhan's accusers did not know him in Afghanistan, and their accusations were complete fabrications. Jowad Jabar v. George W. Bush A petition of habeas corpus, Jowad Jabar v. George W. Bush was filed on Jowad Jabar's behalf. In response, on 22 December 2005 the Department of Defense published a dossier of 24 pages of unclassified documents from his Tribunal. In September 2007, the Department of Defense published the unclassified dossiers arising from the Combatant Status Review Tribunals of 179 captives. The documents record Captive 433 requested witnesses. However different documents in his dossier state he requested two, three, four, and five witnesses. Tribunal panel 19 convened on 2004-12-03 and confirmed his enemy combatant status. Administrative Review Board hearings Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual Administrative Review Board hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant". They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat—or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free. First annual Administrative Review Board hearing A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for his first annual Administrative Review Board. Transcript Sadkhan chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing. Second annual Administrative Review Board hearing A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for his second