number of cuts or cuts, the results were analyzed and reported as a percentage of the total NISP with observed cuts (%NISPcut) or as a percentage of the total MNC with observed cuts. Close to (%MNEcut). Although %NISPcut and %MNEcut are units of quantitative analysis commonly used in cut-off studies, their reliability has rarely been assessed in the context of bone segmentation. Fragment-count The cutmark count is a count of how many individual cutmarks, or get-togethers of cutmarks in a given skeletal area (e.g., Abe et al., 2002:645; Lyman 1994b:303-304; Nilssen, 2000:40; White, 1992:146), while fragment-count is the level of the full-scale number of quantitative units (e.g., NISP or MNE) with saw cutmarks. Cutmark piece considers are, when in doubt, detailed %NISPcut, the level of the complete NISP showing cutmarks (NISPcut) (Abe et al., 2002:645; Lyman, 1994b:304-305; 2005). Abe et al. (2002) identified an ordinary issue with this technique. They showed that because of abnormality and bone-breaking down, %NISPcut possibly underrates the level of models with cutmarks. This is generally the circumstance considering the way that cutmarks are inflicted on a skeletal part during butchery when defleshing and dis-articulating a creature. These cycles are commonly performed before breakage related to the extraction of inside bone improvements like marrow and oil. Abe et al. (2002) propose that if a skeletal part, say the femur, was defleshed and disarticulated, the level of cutmarks examples of the immovable number of models ought to be 1/1, thinking about the way that, for this current situation, the outright part is additionally a model (%NISPcut 100; Abe et al., 2002: Fig. 1a). Notwithstanding, after that equivalent part is dealt with for marrow and segregated, the level of cutmarks models can end up being more fundamental, speculatively, as Abe et al's. Fig. 1b portrays, 2/8 (articular fruitions despite screw regions; %NISPcut 25). The fragmentation cycle causing this model is clear concerning cutmarks surface region identical to the whole surface region all through a total bone. However, on the off chance that totally covered by cutmarks, undeniably the surface region expected by cutmarks all through a skeletal part will be by and large insignificant contrasting with the excess, whole surface area. Fittingly, in the event that the bone brokenness process isn't specifically focusing on cutmarked surfaces, the imbalanced extent of cut and whole surface regions ought to persistently pass a further degree of whole portions onto cut parts,