statistics, because it will inflate the statistical significance. Thus in these situations MNI should be used instead. Modern uses Cut-mark analyses The archaeological sites give vital information concerning the massacre, and the examination of the traces provides that knowledge. Colored bands have been used to study anything from the evolutionary impacts of meat-eating in Africa (e.g. Bunn, 1981, 1983; Shipman and Rose, 1983) to culturally mediated slaughter patterns in the United States. to the north (e.g. Frison, 1970; Guilday et al., 1962). Abe et al. (2002), Dominguez Rodrigo and Iravedra (2009), Fischer (1995: 12–18), Lyman (1987; 1994b: 297–314), Nielssen (2000), and White (1992: 143–146) are examples of researchers from other nations. The cut mark pattern is usually determined by observing the frequency and relative location of cuts on skeletal parts. These patterns are then related to butcher behavior, frequently utilizing ethnographic, factual, and/or empirical data as a frame of reference (e.g. Binford, 1978, 1981; Dewberry and Russell, 2007; Lupo and O'Connell, 2002). Although analysts' approaches for quantifying, assessing, and reporting landmarks vary depending on their study aims (see Abe et al., 2002:645-646; Bartram, 1993), differences in samples and conclusions owing to methodologies and units of quantification have not been experimentally investigated. Cut-mark studies and two types of quantitative In general, most tracing studies use two types of quantification: one used to identify and explain the anatomical part of the group, and one used to determine the frequency of cutting the anatomical part described above. The unit is in use. The anatomical segment is usually determined by the specified number of specimens (NISP) or the minimum number of items (MNE). Similar to MNE, some researchers use cMNE. When using MNE or cMNE as a quantitative unit, archaeologists usually refer to the complete skeletal component (eg, femur, ). You need to be clear about what you're doing. Unless some bone element is otherwise specified (eg, proximal femur, distal femur). The NISP, on the other hand, is a unit of measurement associated with a particular sample that may or may not be a complete structural element but is identified as part and sometimes as a complete structural element. Screaming. In the case of lines, two quantitative units are widely used to measure them. This is the number of glass pieces and the number of samples to hold the glass panes, which was subsequently identified as the number of glass pieces. After calculating the