Young v. Young (1993) to support this proposition. In this situation, evaluating the ban on kirpans should be done through administrative law regarding the commission's authority to protect security of person, and then this evaluation should be judged in light of the Constitution. Before moving to section 1, the rights should be defined. In this case, LeBel found no evidence anyone's security of person was at risk. Turning to the Oakes test, he disregarded the requirement for a sufficient objective for rights violations since the governing statutes were not questioned. On the issue of proportionality, he felt the commission did not effectively prove its case. See also List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court) References External links Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law Canadian freedom of religion case law Canadian administrative case law Supreme Court of Canada cases 2006 in Canadian case law Sikhism in Canada Ceremonial knives Education in Canada