the next person will roll something equal to or better than that in one try. In other words, their next opponent would be a 3-to-2 favorite to beat or tie them. However, if the first player were to decide to roll again, he or she would then need to roll a 62 on their second turn, or a 64 on their third to maintain even this mediocre statistical position. Another result of 52 on a second roll would raise the likelihood of losing to or tying an opponent with two chances to roll to roughly 85%. This is of course a terrible position to be in, and the lead roller would almost certainly roll a third time, which would, in turn, give opponents more chances to beat him or her. If the lead roller were sufficiently hapless as to come up with yet another result of 52 on the third roll, an opponent would have approximately a 95% likelihood of beating or tying that result in three attempts, making our first roller a 19-to-1 underdog for that round - just as if that player had rolled for the lowest possible result, a 31, and then stopped after just one roll. Below is a statistical breakdown of all possible rolls and their likelihood of being beaten (but not tied), according to the number of attempts an opponent has to roll against them. The median rolls, depending on how many rolls have been taken, are in boldface text. {|border="2" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="border: 3px #aaa solid; font-size: 95%;" |- style="Background: #eee" ! Result (x) ! Likelihood:Any 1 roll > x ! Likelihood:Any 1 of 2 rolls > x ! Likelihood:Any 1 of 3 rolls > x |- | 31 | 94.44% | 99.69% | 99.98% |- | 32 | 88.89% | 98.78% | 99.86% |- | 41 | 83.33% | 97.22% | 99.54% |- | 42 | 77.78% | 95.06% | 98.90% |- | 43 | 72.22% | 92.28% | 97.86% |- | 51 | 66.67% | 88.89% | 96.30% |- | 52 | 61.11% | 84.88% | 94.12% |- | 53 | 55.56% | 80.25% | 91.22% |- | 54 | 50.00% | 75.00% | 87.50% |- | 61 | 44.44% | 69.14% | 82.85% |- | 62 | 38.89% | 62.65% | 77.18% |- | 63 | 33.33% | 55.56% | 70.37% |- | 64 | 27.78% | 47.84% | 62.33%