a statute impinges on a fundamental right, such as those listed in the Bill of Rights or the due process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment, then the court will apply strict scrutiny. This means the statute must be "narrowly tailored" to address a "compelling state interest." The courts will also apply strict scrutiny if the law targets a suspect classification, such as race. Canada In Canada, a decision of a tribunal, board, commission or other government decision-maker can be reviewed on two standards depending on the circumstances. The two standards applied are "correctness" and "reasonableness". In each case, a court must undertake a "standard of review analysis" to determine the appropriate standard to apply. See also Appeal Judicial review Administrative law United States administrative law Canadian administrative law Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1998) Dunsmuir v New Brunswick (2008) Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov (2019) Rational basis review Intermediate scrutiny Strict scrutiny Undue burden standard References External links Dunsmuir Roundtable, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, published 4 June 2008