the United States Constitution. In his ruling, the judge, John E. Jones III, stated Jones also commented that the appearance of design is subjective: The judge ruled that "ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents" and "that ID is an interesting theological argument, but that it is not science." See also Anthropic principle Conflict thesis Continuity thesis Flying Spaghetti Monster Genesis creation narrative Great Architect of the Universe References External links Claim CI001: Intelligent design (ID) is scientific from the talk.origins Archive's Index to Creationist Claims, and sub-claims. Evolution & Creation: A Theosophic Synthesis Surveys critical problems on both sides of the ID controversy and explores ancient and modern concepts of intelligent designer(s) Who Designed the Designer? by Jason Rosenhouse Creationism