introducing a Kantian turn in contemporary analytic philosophy has been taken up by his student Robert Brandom. Brandom's work has transformed Sellars' project to introducing a Hegelian phase in analytic philosophy. In the 1980s, interest in neo-Kantianism has revived in the wake of the work of Gillian Rose, who is a critic of this movement's influence on modern philosophy, and because of its influence on the work of Max Weber. The Kantian concern for the limits of perception strongly influenced the antipositivist sociological movement in late 19th-century Germany, particularly in the work of Georg Simmel (Simmel's question 'What is society?' is a direct allusion to Kant's own: 'What is nature'?). The current work of Michael Friedman is explicitly neo-Kantian. Continental philosophers drawing on the Kantian understandings of the transcendental include Jean-François Lyotard and Jean-Luc Nancy. Classical conservative thinker Roger Scruton has been greatly influenced by Kantian ethics and aesthetics. See also German idealism North American Kant Society Notes References Sebastian Luft (ed.), The Neo-Kantian Reader, Routledge, 2015. Further reading Frederick C. Beiser (2014), The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796-1880 (Oxford: Oxford University Press) Hermann Cohen (1919), Religion of Reason Out of the Sources of Modern Judaism (1978, trans. New York) Harry van der Linden (1988), Kantian Ethics and Socialism (Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis and Cambridge) Thomas Mormann; Mikhail Katz. Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2013), no. 2, 236-280. See https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671348 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1027. Gillian Rose (1981), Hegel Contra Sociology (Athlone: London) Arthur Schopenhauer (1818), The World as Will and Representation (1969, trans. Dover: New York) External links Neo-Kantianism article in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Kantianism