P. M. (1834) The Bridgewater Treatise on the Power, Wisdom and Goodness of God As Manifested in the Creation. Treatise V. Animal and Vegetable Physiology. London, Pickering. He mistook a rant by Rafinesque (1836) against the Linnean system for a rant of Matthew against the poor selection regimes of nurserymen. He mistook political rants for biological ones (see Wilson 1837). He mistook a theatre critique with a scientific piece (Anon. 1837). He failed concerning an ostensibly anonymous translation, that was neither a translation nor even contained the phrase in question (Anon. translator 1842). Note: Sutton mis-references this as 1838. He mistook poor selection regimes with hybridization (Armstrong and Buel 1840). He mistook an anecdote about a parlor games with the competitive advantage of established trees (Rush & Butler 1840). Sutton wrongly attributes this to the periodical's owner-editor, Conrad Swackhamer. He mistook the failure of a contemporary (i.e., Selby 1842) to get Matthew's idea as a proof that Selby did get Matthew's idea. Furthermore, Selby doesn't actually ever use the phrase as claimed by Sutton. He mistook law-stuff with natural history (Alabama Supreme Court 1846). He mistook an editor and re-publisher for the original author. Sutton cites Wilkin (1852) which is an edited collected works, within which the matching phrase occurs, in Browne (1658). He mistook the worst that's ever been published on education with the best that's been published on natural history (see Andrews 1853). He mistook a piece on language and historiography with one on natural history (see Mure 1854). He mistook cultural (religious) causes with natural (ecological) ones (see Fishbourne 1855). He took a review of Baden Powell's 1857 essay, Christianity without Judaism on theology to be an original natural history source. Joseph Hooker commented on how parsons such as Powell, are so in the habit of dealing with the abstractions of doctrines as if there was no difficulty about them whatever, a criticism that could be levied at others who wander outside their academic and intellectual limits. He mistook an account of a spiritualist ranting about the polygamy of Mormons and the celibacy of Shakers with science (see Hallock 1858). He mistook communicating member's report of a debate about neurophysiology involving Hartshorne (1858) with an original statement by Leidy and took it to be on natural history. Natural theology Writing to Darwin in 1871, Matthew enclosed an article he had written for The Scotsman and, as well