ban was unconstitutional. Stevens, in Parts III and V, which were joined by Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kennedy, and Justice Souter, stated that the First Amendment allowed for greater regulation of commercial advertising than non-commercial advertising. Stevens, in Part IV, which was joined by Justice Kennedy and Justice Ginsburg, concluded that not all commercial advertising is as protected as other types of commercial advertising. Stevens, in Part VI, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Thomas, rejected the Court's reasoning in Posadas. References External links Case brief: Quimbee United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court United States commercial speech case law 1996 in United States case law Legal history of Rhode Island United States Twenty-first Amendment case law Advertising regulation Alcohol law in the United States