remnants of what he labelled the Caesarean Text, differing in a number of common respects from the then established Byzantine, Western and Alexandrian text-types. (The text-types are groups of different New Testament manuscripts which share specific or generally related readings, which then differ from each other group, and thus the conflicting readings can separate out the groups. These are then used to determine the original text as published; the three main types are as above.) Scholars disagree as to whether this is a correct classification, or if a "Caesarean text-type" even exists, it is however demonstratable that ƒ is not able to be placed within the Alexandrian, Western, or Byzantine text-types. Biblical scholar Silva Lake (wife of Kirsopp Lake), discovered that Minuscule 652 represents the text of ƒ in Mark 4:20-6:24, though this agreement was mainly with minuscules 118, 131, and 209, as opposed to a similar agreement with minuscule 1. Biblical scholar Amy Anderson made a new reconstruction of the family tree in 2004, demonstrating minuscule 1582 was a more exact representation of the text of the archetype than minuscule 1. She identified the Family 1 manuscripts in Matthew as the minuscules 1, 22, 118, 131, 205, 209, 872, 1192, 1210, 1278, 1582, 2193 and 2542. Alison Sarah Welsby, in her 2012 doctoral thesis, identified the ƒ manuscripts in John as the minuscules 1, 22, 118, 131, 205 (2886), 205, 209, 565, 872, 884, 1192, 1210, 1278, 1582, 2193, 2372, and 2713, also coinciding with Anderson's view that 1582 was a better ƒ witness than 1. The work of Bruce Morrill on John 18 also confirmed 138, 357, 994, 2517 and 2575 as core members of ƒ in John's Gospel. Within the family, there are three manuscripts which may be more closely related. 209 was part of Catholic humanist and theologian Cardinal Bessarion's collection by 1438 A.D., and may have served as the exemplar for minuscule 2886, which was copied at his direction before 1468 CE, and even minuscule 205, which was copied at his direction after 1468 CE. Minuscule 2886, before receiving its own Gregory-Aland number (an official list of known New Testament manuscripts), was long assumed to be a direct copy of 205 and was thus named 205 (from Abschrift, the German word for copy). Biblical scholar D. C. Parker rehearsed Lake's views who thought 209 to have been the parent of 205, and then Parker rehearses