Sell v. United States, The Supreme Court laid down four criteria for cases involving the involuntary administration of medication to an incompetent pretrial defendant. Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) The Constitution's Due Process Clause does not necessarily compel the acquittal of any defendant who, because of mental illness, could not tell right from wrong when committing their crime. Detention of terrorism suspects Rasul v. Bush, The federal court system has the authority to decide if foreign nationals held at Guantanamo Bay were wrongfully imprisoned. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, The federal government has the power to detain those it designates as enemy combatants, including United States citizens, but detainees that are United States citizens must have the rights of due process and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, The military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay detention camp are illegal because they lack the protections that are required by the Geneva Conventions and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Boumediene v. Bush, Foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have the constitutional right to challenge their detention in United States courts. Capital punishment Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, A condemned person does not suffer double jeopardy when he is executed again after the failure of the first attempt. Furman v. Georgia, The arbitrary and inconsistent imposition of the death penalty violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. This decision initiates a nationwide de facto moratorium on executions that lasts until the Supreme Court's decision in Gregg v. Georgia (1976). Gregg v. Georgia, Georgia's new death penalty statute is constitutional because it adequately narrows the class of defendants eligible for the death penalty. This case and the next four cases were consolidated and decided simultaneously. By evaluating the new death penalty statutes that had been passed by the states, the Supreme Court ended the moratorium on executions that began with its decision in Furman v. Georgia (1972). Proffitt v. Florida, Florida's new death penalty statute is constitutional because it requires the comparison of aggravating factors to mitigating factors in order to impose a death sentence. Jurek v. Texas, Texas's new death penalty statute is constitutional because it uses a three-part test to determine if a death sentence should be imposed. Woodson v. North Carolina, North Carolina's new death penalty