money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech; therefore, federal limits on campaign contributions are constitutional in only a limited number of circumstances.Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Commercial speech enjoys limited First Amendment protection.Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, Broadcasting has less First Amendment protection than other forms of communication because of its pervasive nature. The Federal Communications Commission has broad authority to determine what constitutes indecency in different contexts.Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, The United States Supreme Court laid out a four-part test for determining when restrictions on commercial speech violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., Nonviolent boycotts and related activities to bring about political, social, and economic change are political speech which are entitled to the protection of the First Amendment.New York v. Ferber, Laws that prohibit the sale, distribution, and advertisement of child pornography are constitutional even if the content does not meet the conditions necessary for it to be labeled obscene.Connick v. Myers, Public employers may take adverse action against employees for otherwise protected speech on matters of public concern, including speech critical of them, if they have a reasonable belief that the speech is disruptive to their operations.Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico, Illustrated the elasticity of the Central Hudson standards for regulating commercial speech.Bethel School District v. Fraser, The First Amendment permits a public school to punish a student for giving a lewd and indecent speech at a school assembly even if the speech is not obscene.Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, Public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student expression or newspapers established by policy or practice as forums for student expression.Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, Parodies of public figures, including those intended to cause emotional distress, are protected by the First Amendment.Texas v. Johnson, A Texas law that criminalizes the desecration of the American flag is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment's protection of symbolic speech. This decision invalidates laws prohibiting flag desecration in 48 of the 50 states. Alaska and Wyoming had no such laws.Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., While nude dancing is a form of expressive conduct, public indecency laws regulating or prohibiting nude dancing are constitutional because