has a legal expectation of privacy and a legal right to exclude others from entry into the premises. This case is notable for being the only case based on Third Amendment claims that has been decided by a federal appeals court. Fourteenth Amendment rightsSlaughter-House Cases, The Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies to the benefits of federal United States citizenship but not to the benefits of state citizenship.Allgeyer v. Louisiana, The liberty that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment includes economic liberty.Meyer v. Nebraska, A 1919 Nebraska law prohibiting the teaching of modern foreign languages to grade-school children violated the Due Process Clause.Pierce v. Society of Sisters, Parents have the right to choose the school of their choice for their children's education under the Due Process Clause.Skinner v. Oklahoma, State eugenics laws mandating sterilization of criminals convicted of some crimes but not others are unconstitutional as it violates a person's rights given under the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.International Shoe Co. v. Washington, Minimum contacts with the forum state can enable a court in that state to exert personal jurisdiction over a party consistent with the Due Process Clause.Goldberg v. Kelly, The termination of welfare benefits must be preceded by a full evidentiary hearing under the Due Process Clause.San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, The use of property taxes to finance public education does not violate the Equal Protection Clause.Mathews v. Eldridge, When procedural due process applies, courts must consider the government's interests, the individual's interests, and the likelihood of making an inaccurate decision using the existing procedures as well as the probable value of additional procedural safeguards.Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, Public employees are entitled to some form of hearing prior to termination for cause, overruling Arnett v. Kennedy. Separation of powers Marbury v. Madison, Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional because it attempts to expand the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that contradict the Constitution. This case featured the first example of judicial nullification of a federal law and was the point at which the Supreme Court adopted a monitoring role over government actions.Little v. Barreme, The President does not have "inherent authority" or "inherent powers" that allow him to ignore a law passed by the US