systematically removed from past and present works. Some authors, such as Thomas Reynolds, without challenging the authenticity of the forgery, took care to note its discrepancies and challenge the quality of its information. This was not always so, even after the forgery was debunked. Gonzalo Arias (died 2008) proposed that some of the distance anomalies in the British section of the Antonine Itinerary resulted from the loss of Latin grammatical endings, as these had marked junctions heading towards places, as distinct from the places themselves. However, Arias may not have taken account of earlier work indicating that distances were measured between the edges of administrative areas of named settlements as opposed to centre-to-centre, thereby explaining supposed distance shortfalls and providing additional useful data on the approximate sizes of such areas. Hispania There are 34 routes in the itinerary for the provinces of Hispania. See also Roman units Citations Bibliography The standard modern edition of the Itinerary is in O. Cuntz, Itineraria Romana, vol. 1: Itineraria Antonini Augusti et Burdigalense (Leipzig 1929), nos, 175 (terrestrial), 7685 (maritime). The first edition was by Geoffroy Troy: Bernd Löhberg, Das 'Itinerarium provinciarum Antonini Augusti' (2006) External links The Antonine Itinerary: Iter Britanniarum - The British Section Analysis of the Itinerary Itinerarium Antonini Augusti (the Balkanic roads) at SOLTDM.COM Roman Roads in Britain Geography of England Geography of Wales Latin prose texts Maps Nerva–Antonine dynasty Roman itineraries 2nd-century Latin books Historic maps of the Roman Empire Geography of Portugal Geography of Spain