the clotting is reassessed. If a clotting inhibitor such as a lupus anticoagulant is present, the inhibitor will interact with the normal pooled plasma and the clotting time will generally remain abnormal. However, if the clotting time of the mixed plasma corrects towards normal, the presence of an inhibitor such as the lupus anticoagulant is less likely, instead indicating a deficient quantity of clotting factor (that is replenished by the normal plasma). In case of a corrected mixing test, a lower dose of normal pooled plasma is often used, such as a 4:1 mix (4 times as much patient plasma than normal pooled plasma), as some studies suggest that this method is more sensitive for the detection of a weak lupus anticoagulant that is not enough prevalent or potent to affect a 1:1 mix. However, only about 60 per cent of patients with lupus anticoagulants have a both a prolonged APTT and APTT mix, making it unsuitable as the only test in case of a high suspicion of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Thus, one or more of the following tests are generally performed to detect lupus anticoagulant if a high suspicion remains, and/or specify lupus anticoagulant as the cause of an abnormal mixing test: Phospholipid-sensitive functional clotting testing, such as the dilute Russell's viper venom time, or the Kaolin clotting time. As a further confirmation, a second test with the addition of excess phospholipid will correct the prolongation (conceptually known as "phospholipid neutralization"), confirming the diagnosis of a lupus anticoagulant. Lupus-sensitive aPTT, of which many variants exist, but have the common feature of having a greater sensitivity of becoming prolonged in the presence of lupus anticoagulant compared to a regular aPTT. Hexagonal (II) phase phospholipid neutralization, wherein such phospholipids specifically neutralize lupus anticoagulant, so a normalization of aPTT after adding it specifically indicates the presence lupus anticoagulants. Treatment Treatment for a lupus anticoagulant is usually undertaken in the context of documented thrombosis, such as extremity phlebitis or dural sinus vein thrombosis. Patients with a well-documented (i.e., present at least twice) lupus anticoagulant and a history of thrombosis should be considered candidates for indefinite treatment with anticoagulants. Patients with no history of thrombosis and a lupus anticoagulant should probably be observed. Current evidence suggests that the risk of recurrent thrombosis in patients with an antiphospholipid antibody is enhanced whether that antibody is measured on serological testing or functional testing. The Sapporo criteria