city wide health surveys should include Stop and Frisk encounters, so that the data can be used to investigate health outcomes of a Stop and Frisk. Second, within 24 hours, reports of traumatic stops should be received by the city. Third, a registry should be created in which communities can report police encounters. Torres calls for more comprehensive data in stop and frisk reports. Specifically, since Latinos can also be white and black, current data is not as accurate. Data collection The following states require stop-and-frisk data collection: Using public record requests, the Stanford Open Policing project amassed 60 million state traffic stops in 20 states over the period 2011 through 2015. North Carolina was the first state in the country to require the release of all traffic stop data starting in 2000. Researchers have analysed 20 million traffic stops from this data finding that African Americans as a share of the population were twice as likely to be pulled over than whites and four times as likely to be searched. Hispanics were not more likely to be pulled over, but had a higher likelihood of being searched. There is a push to release more open police data nationwide. In 2015, the White House launched the Police Data Initiative which, , has 130 participating police departments, some of which provide data sets on stop-and-frisk. The 130 departments cover 15% of the population. See also Consent search case law Stop-and-frisk in New York City Powers of the police in England and Wales#Search without arrest Notes References Further reading External links United States Supreme Court - Terry v. Ohio - Court Documents Ethically disputed judicial practices African-American-related controversies Race-related controversies in the United States Law enforcement in the United States Law enforcement techniques Privacy law in the United States Searches and seizures